Case law

Technical & Professional Services, Inc. v. Board of Zoning Adjustment of Jackson County

558 S.W.2d 798 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Oct 31, 1977

See, for example: City of Miami v. Woolin, 387 F.2d 893 (5th Cir. 1968); Circle Lounge & Grille v. Board of Appeal of Boston, 324 Mass. 427 , 86 N.E.2d 920 (1949); Henle v. … Tangentially, a sound decisional basis for Professional Services’ first ground for relief is, in a sense, adroitly summarized in Fan Sicklen v. Browne, 15 Cal.App.3d 122, 127-28 , 92 Cal.

City of Westport ex rel. Tomb v. Jackson

69 Mo. App. 148 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Feb 15, 1897

Brown v. Commissioners, 21 Pa. St. 42; Harrington v. Trustees, 10 Wend. 553 ; 23 Am. and Eng. Ency of Law, 311. … Louis v.

Carpenter v. Burmeister

217 Mo. App. 104 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jun 18, 1925

[Forbes v. Dunnavant, 198 Mo. 193 , 95 S. W. 934 ; Deiner v. Sutermeister, 266 Mo. 505 , 178 S. W. 757 ; Most v. Goebel Const. Co., 199 Mo. App. 336 , 203 S. W. 474 .] … [Lackland v. Railroad, 101 Mo. App. 420 , 74 S. W. 505 . See also: Brown v. Railroad, 104 Mo. App. 691 , 78 S. W. 273 .] Some of the authorities to sustain us are briefly referred to. In Sherwood v.

McRentals, Inc. v. Barber

62 S.W.3d 684 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Dec 18, 2001

Clinton McDonald is the majority shareholder and chairman of the board of McRentals. His wife, Irene McDonald, and their children, Larry McDonald and Sharon Brown, are minority shareholders of McRentals. … Barber met with Clinton and Irene McDonald, Larry McDonald and Sharon Brown at Sharon Brown’s house in Sedalia. At the meeting, Mr.

Price v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railroad

40 Mo. App. 189 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Mar 31, 1890

Browne Stat. Frauds, 197; Swift v. Pierce, 13 Allen, 136 ; Bugbee v. Kendricken, 130 Mass. 437 ; Walker v. Richards, 39 N. H. 259; Rottman v. Fix, 25 Mo. App. 571 . … Sumner v. Rogers, 90 Mo. 324 ; Carson v. Cummings, 69 Mo. 325 . We will, therefore, reverse the judgment. The other judges concur.

Katz v. Missouri Board of Registration for the Healing Arts

147 S.W.3d 813 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Sep 7, 2004

For purposes of judicial review, the decision of the Commission and the subsequent disciplinary order of the Missouri Board of Registration are treated as one decision. Perez v. … Missouri State Board of Registration for the Healing Arts, 803 S.W.2d 160, 162 (Mo.App.1991).

Richardson v. Hardin-Central C-II Public School District

884 S.W.2d 53 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jul 19, 1994

Missouri Real Estate Commission v. Carr, 695 S.W.2d 169, 170 (Mo.App.1985). Reinstatement was not an appropriate remedy. … Bhargave v. Cloer, 355 F.Supp. 1148, 1146 (N.D.Ga.1972). See Brown v. Weir, 675 S.W.2d 135, 139 (Mo.App.1984).

R.C. v. Southwestern Bell Telephone Co.

759 S.W.2d 617 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Sep 6, 1988

To the extent that the members of the Board of Police Commissioners were sued in their official capacities as the Board, the doctrine of sovereign immunity applies equally. Best v. Schoemehl, supra, [3]. … Advance Rental Centers v. Brown, 729 S.W.2d 644 (Mo.App.1987) [1, 2]; Meadows v. Friedman Railroad Salvage Warehouse, 655 S.W.2d 718 (Mo.App.1983) [1-4].

State ex rel. Klawuhn v. Board of Zoning Adjustment of St. Joseph

952 S.W.2d 725 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Aug 19, 1997

Tucker v. McDonald, 793 S.W.2d 616, 618 (Mo.App.1990); Ogawa v. City of Des Peres, 745 S.W.2d 238, 242-43 (Mo.App.1987); Brown v. … Wrenn v. Board of Zoning Adjustment of Kansas City, 923 S.W.2d 423 (Mo.App.1996), the ZBA argues because Ms.

Daugherty v. Poundstone

120 Mo. App. 300 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Oct 1, 1906

Brown were merely executory, had no relation to the management of the bank, and therefore cannot be classed with transactions that in the regular course of things should have come under the observation of the board of directors … [Bank v. Hill, 148 Mo. 380 , and authorities cited.] Before proceeding to a discussion of the second question propounded, we will determine the question of the cashier’s negligence.

State Ex Rel. Wingfield v. Kansas City

217 Mo. App. 288 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jun 16, 1924

[Drainage District v. County, 189 S. W. 1176 , 269 Mo. 78 , and the same parties, 216 S. W. 949 ; Brown v. Railroad, 198 Mo. App. 71 .] We therefore hold against the contention of defendants on this point. … As is said in Davis v.

State ex rel. City of Fulton v. Hamilton

941 S.W.2d 785 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Mar 25, 1997

Brown v. Tate, 888 S.W.2d 413, 414 (Mo.App.1994). As such, the officer has the benefit of the doctrine, which acts as a shield against liability from torts arising out of discretionary acts. Fonseca v. … Brown, 888 S.W.2d at 415 . A police officer responding to an emergency call, however, is performing a discretionary function. Bachmann v. Welby, 860 S.W.2d 31, 34 (Mo.App.1993).

Sinquefield v. Jones

435 S.W.3d 674 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Mar 11, 2014

Brown v. Carnahan, 370 S.W.3d 637, 645 (Mo. banc 2012) (quoting Missourians to Protect the Initiative Process v. Blunt, 799 S.W.2d 824, 827 (Mo. banc 1990) (citing Mo. Const., art. … Brown v. Carnahan, 370 S.W.3d at 649 .

Otis v. Browning

59 Mo. App. 326 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Nov 5, 1894

Waugh gave the deed thus executed into the hands of Otis with authority to fill the blank as to the name of the grantee, and then we may well say, as was said in Field v. … In view, then, of these facts, can it be said that Browning got nothing from Otis?

State Ex Rel. Capps v. Bruns

353 S.W.2d 829 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Feb 4, 1962

See Brown et al. v. Gambrel et al., Mo., 213 S.W.2d 931, 935 . In addition, General Ordinance 3162, Sec. 11-21, City of St. Joseph, squarely authorizes such continuing nonconforming use. In Braun et al. v. … The Court ruled petitioner had the right to continue the business without approval of the Board. In Campbell et al. v.

Charlesworth v. Jacob

224 Mo. App. 1014 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Feb 17, 1930

Charlesworth, plaintiff, v. Blanch E. Jacob and F. E. Jacob, defendants, Hattie Morris Brown, interpleader. … [See Kortjohn v. Seimers, 29 Mo. App. 271, 276 ; Browning v. Hilig, 69 Mo. App. 594, 596 ; Addison v. Dent Co. Savs. Bank, 205 Mo. App. 622 ; State ex rel. v. Ry. Co., 193 S. W. 932 ; Skinner v. Slater, 159 Mo.

American Aberdeen Angus v. Stanton

762 S.W.2d 501 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Dec 13, 1988

Browning-Ferris Indus. of Kansas City, Inc. v. Dance, 671 S.W.2d 801, 808 (Mo.App.1984). … Co. v. Moniteau County, 357 Mo. 448, 456 , 209 S.W.2d 127, 131 (1948); County of Bollinger v. Ladd, 564 S.W.2d 267, 270 (Mo.App.1978).

Jones v. St. Louis & San Francisco Railroad

115 Mo. App. 232 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Dec 12, 1905

[Sloan & Co. v. Railroad, 58 Mo. 220 ; Potts v. Railway, 17 Mo. App. 394 ; Brown v. Railway, 18 Mo. App. 568 ; Popham v. Barnard, 77 Mo. App. 626 .] A case squarely in point is Indianapolis, Bloomington & Western Ry. … Co. v.

Rousey v. Wood

47 Mo. App. 465 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jan 18, 1892

Robinson v. James, 71 Mo. 582 ; State v. Hays, 78 Mo. 600 ; City of Hopkins v. Railroad, 79 Mo. 100 ; Spurlock v. Dougherty, 81 Mo. 171 . … Walker v. Likens, 24 Mo. 298 ; Wyatt v. Thomas, 29 Mo. 23 ; Howard v. Clark, 43 Mo. 348 ; Dunbar v. Wightman, 51 Mo. 432; Brown v. Harris, 52 Mo. 306; Melcher v. Scruggs, 72 Mo. 406 .

Mary Beth Fryman v. The Board of Regents of Southeast Missouri State University

Missouri Court of Appeals · Dec 31, 2024

In support, the Board relies on Dale By and Through Dale v. Edmonds, 819 S.W.2d 388 (Mo. App. 1991) and Patterson v. Meramec Valley R-III School District, 864 S.W.2d 14 (Mo. App. 1993). … Hensley v. Jackson Cnty., 227 S.W.3d 491, 496 (Mo. banc 2007) (quoting Oldaker v. Peters, 869 S.W.2d 94, 100 (Mo. App. 1993)).