Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersmoctapp

10,000+ results

1.04s

  • Retirement Board of the Police Retirement System v. Noel ex rel. Noel

    652 S.W.2d 874 · Missouri Court of Appeals · May 31, 1983

    The court in Oates v. Safeco Ins. … Aversman v. Danner, supra, at 121, quoting Grissum v. Reesman, 505 S.W.2d 81, 86 (Mo.1974). Absent such proof, we must affirm the trial court’s finding that the burden had not been met. Murphy v.

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • Whitworth v. Jones

    41 S.W.3d 625 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Apr 10, 2001

    Brown, property and that Defendant committed civil contempt. … See Creamer v. Banholzer, 694 S.W.2d 497, 499 (Mo.App. E.D. 1985). Here, the record does not show that Defendant either complied with the order or that enforcement has been sought.

    Cited 19 timesPublished
  • Missouri Hospital Ass'n v. Missouri Department of Consumer Affairs, Regulation & Licensing

    731 S.W.2d 262 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Mar 31, 1987

    Goldberg v. Darnold, 604 S.W.2d 826, 830 (Mo.App. *264 1980). We are therefore reviewing the decision of the circuit court. … See Brown-Forman Distillers Corp. v. Stewart, 520 S.W.2d 1 (Mo. banc 1975); Missourians for Honest Elections v. Missouri Elections Commission, 536 S.W.2d 766 (Mo.App.1976).

    Cited 12 timesPublished
  • Williams v. Anderson Air Activities

    319 S.W.2d 61 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Dec 1, 1958

    This drain board weighed approximately one hundred twenty to one hundred twenty-five pounds. … Wood v. Wagner Electric Corp., 355 Mo. 670 , 197 S.W.2d 647 ; Brown v. Anthony Mfg. Co., Mo., 311 S.W.2d 23 ; Slider v. Brown Shoe Co., Mo.App., 308 S.W.2d 306 .

    Cited 39 timesPublished
  • Murphy v. Knights of Columbus Building Co.

    155 Mo. App. 649 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Mar 4, 1911

    Co. v. Wanamaker & Brown, 115 Mo. App. 270, 295 , 90 S. W. 737 .] … The evidence shows that plaintiffs’ letter which first called attention to the Mahler Hall property was read to the board at its regular meeting. Afterwards the board purchased that property.

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • Massage Therapy Training Institute, LLC v. Missouri State Board of Therapeutic Massage

    65 S.W.3d 601 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jan 29, 2002

    Ass’n v. … State v. Rousseau, 34 S.W.3d 254, 261 [11] (Mo.App.2000).

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Dameron v. Board of Education of the Lebanon School District R-3

    549 S.W.2d 671 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Apr 7, 1977

    Foreign authorities consistent with this holding include Lawson v. Wayne Community School Dist., 63 Mich.App. 57 , 233 N.W.2d 713, 714 [2, 3] (1975); Sorin v. … Bd. of Educ., 39 Ohio Misc. 108 , 315 N.E.2d 848, 853 [4, 6] (1974); Board of Trustees, Laramie Cty. Sch. D. No. I v. Spiegel, 549 P.2d 1161, 1170 [1] (Wyo.1976).

    Cited 12 timesPublished
  • Armco Steel Corp. v. Labor & Industrial Relations Commission, Division of Employment Security

    553 S.W.2d 506 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jun 27, 1977

    Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, 192 Pa.Super. 141 , 159 A.2d 574 (1960), Martin v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, 196 Pa.Super. 293 , 175 A.2d 116 (1961), Harne v. … This proposition finds support in the following cases: Robertson v. Brown, 139 So.2d 226 (La.Ct.App.1962), 40% reduction; Johns-Manville Prod. Corp. v.

    Cited 17 timesPublished
  • State ex rel. Valentine v. Board of Police Commissioners of Kansas City

    813 S.W.2d 955 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Aug 20, 1991

    A similar issue was addressed in Travers v. Board of Trustees of Employees’ Retirement Sys., 756 S.W.2d 623 (Mo.App.1988). … Clark v.

    Cited 11 timesPublished
  • State ex rel. Koewing v. Franklin County Board of Zoning Adjustment

    809 S.W.2d 874 · Missouri Court of Appeals · May 28, 1991

    In Miller v. … The petition alleges § 64.660 establishes the Franklin County Zoning Board as a board of freeholders. He contends the statute is unconstitutional on the authority of Quinn v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Huston v. State

    679 S.W.2d 408 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Sep 11, 1984

    In State v. … Defendant’s cited case of State v. Brown, 436 S.W.2d 724 (Mo. 1969) is unique and does not support his contention. To the contrary, see Haynes v. State, 561 S.W.2d 450 [2] (Mo.App.1978).

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Eaton v. Bell

    127 S.W.3d 690 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jan 27, 2004

    A report was also made to the State Board of Healing Arts, and the Board restricted Dr. Eaton from working in the field of emergency medicine. Dr. … Id.; Brown v. Brown, 19 S.W.3d 717, 724 (Mo.App. W.D.2000). Instead, a substantial and continuing change in circumstances may be established in other ways. Brown, 19 S.W.3d at 724 .

    Cited 25 timesPublished
  • State ex rel. Saint Louis Charter School v. State Board of Education

    376 S.W.3d 712 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Sep 18, 2012

    See Huff v. Dewey & LeBoeuf, LLP, 340 S.W.3d 623, 627 (Mo.App.2011). A final judgment must dispose of all parties and all issues in the case and leave nothing for future determination. Goodson v. … City of Valley Park v. Armstrong, 273 S.W.3d 504, 508 (Mo. banc 2009).

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • State ex rel. Norwood v. Sheffield

    380 S.W.3d 666 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Oct 18, 2012

    Valentine v. Orr, 366 S.W.3d 534, 541 (Mo. banc 2012). Further, the Board of Probation and Parole’s report of April 23, 2012, clearly recommends that relator be released on probation. … Mertens v. Brown, 198 S.W.3d 616, 618 (Mo. banc 2006).

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Sprenger v. City of Springfield ex rel. Board of Public Utilities

    629 S.W.2d 493 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Nov 10, 1981

    In the caption of the petition he named as the defendant “The City of Springfield, Missouri, a Municipal Corporation by and through the Board of Public Utilities of the City of Springfield, Missouri”. … This court agrees with Hunt v. St. Louis Housing Authority, supra.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • TGB, Inc. v. City of St. Louis Board of Building Appeals

    154 S.W.3d 353 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Oct 26, 2004

    Louis Board of Building Appeals (Board) which denied Tielke’s application to sit for the Journeyman Sprinkler Fitter Examination. … Council v. City of St. Louis, 5 S.W.3d 600, 604 (Mo.App.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • City of Laddonia v. Poor

    73 Mo. App. 465 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Feb 1, 1898

    Corp. [4 Ed.], sec. 322; Kansas City v. Sutton, 52 Mo. App. 398 ; Chillicothe v. Brown, 38 Mo. App. 609 ; St. Louis v. Spiegel, 8 Mo. App. 478 . … In the case of Chillicothe v. Brown, supra, the Kansas City court of appeals had under consideration a similar ordinance, which the court sustained.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • McLellan v. Board of President & Directors of the St. Louis Public Schools

    15 Mo. App. 362 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Apr 15, 1884

    Defendant refused to resign, and was thereupon discharged by defendant’s board of directors. … Inhabitants of Palmyra v. Morton, 25 Mo. 593 . This is enough.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • State ex rel. Lehmann v. Fox C-6 Sch. Dist.

    565 S.W.3d 202 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Oct 23, 2018

    Marler v. State Board of Optometry , 898 S.W.2d 559 (Mo. App. … In Brown v. Weir , 675 S.W.2d 135 , 142 (Mo. App. E.D. 1984), this Court found that Chapter 536 applies to the decision of a board of education to dismiss a teacher.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Walker Reorganized School District R-4 v. Flint

    303 S.W.2d 200 · Missouri Court of Appeals · May 6, 1957

    Brown and Mr. Smith did present to him a petition wanting him to call a board meeting and he agreed to if he could get the board members together. This petition asked for the annexation. … Ray Eddy, president of the Board of Directors of the Coal Creek District, was to the effect that on the afternoon of April 17th, “around twelve o’clock”, Mr. Brown and Mr.

    Cited 13 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.