Case law

Rosenberg v. Shostak

405 S.W.3d 8 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Mar 12, 2013

Highfill v. Hale, 186 S.W.3d 277, 280 (Mo. banc 2006). “Collateral estoppel, or issue preclusion, is used to preclude the relitigation of an issue that already has been decided in a different cause of action.” Brown v. … Johns v. Kays, 181 S.W.3d 565, 566 (Mo. banc 2006). 4 A party may assert collateral es-toppel offensively or defensively. Brown, 370 S.W.3d at 659 .

Spalding v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad

101 Mo. App. 225 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Mar 31, 1903

There is a board on the right hand side in the hallway going into the train dispatcher’s office. I saw on this board three No. 72’s and two or three, two and maybe three, 70’s and one 78. … R. v. Tyson, 46 Miss. l. c. 738-9; Hackett v. B., C. & M. R. R., 35 N. H. 390; Johnson v. Strader & Thompson, 3 Mo. 359 ; Redmon v. C., R. I. & P. R’y Co., 90 Mo. App. 68 .

Fischer v. Browne

586 S.W.2d 733 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jul 31, 1979

Browne then filed a lawsuit in the Circuit Court of Jackson County, Missouri, No. 676763, “Hobert W. Fischer v. … Browne then filed a subsequent action, No. 707638, “Hobert W. Fischer v.

State Ex Rel. Claudia Lee & Associates, Inc. v. Board of Zoning Adjustment

297 S.W.3d 107 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Oct 27, 2009

Standard of Review When reviewing a Board decision on the merits, this court independently reviews the decision of the Board and not the judgment of the trial court. State ex. rel. Teefey v. … Lee argues that the issue cannot be mooted by the passage, after the Board’s decision, of a new zoning ordinance. Lee says Eubanks v.

Cox v. Sayad

647 S.W.2d 884 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jan 25, 1983

Milani v. Miller, 515 S.W.2d 412, 416 (Mo.1974). As this court stated in Plodzien v. … The reports themselves were competent and substantial evidence to support the Board’s express finding that appellant’s reports were contradictory and that therefore one of them must have been false. Compare Brown v.

McKaig v. Kansas City Terminal Railway Co.

355 S.W.2d 409 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Feb 5, 1962

Before reaching the precise question upon which this decision must turn it is helpful to examine the case of Brown v. Terminal Railroad Association of St. … Citing with approval, Brown v. Terminal R. Ass’n, supra, the Ohio Supreme Court ruled the pass provisions applied to her accident and injuries.

Deevers v. Lands

220 Mo. App. 50 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jun 29, 1926

[Smiths’ v. McConathy, 11 Mo. 517 ; Baker v. McDaniel, 178 Mo. 447 , 77 S. W. 531 .] The corruption of the atmosphere. … [McCracken v. Swift & Co. (Mo. App.), 250 S. W. 953 .] In the case of Bielman v. Rys. Co., 50 Mo.

Gaydos Ex Rel. SS Peter & Paul's Catholic Church Cemetery Board v. Imhoff

245 S.W.3d 303 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Feb 19, 2008

Eisele v. Meyers, 929 S.W.2d 752, 755 (Mo.App.1996). … Klemme v. Best, 941 S.W.2d 493, 497 (Mo.banc 1997).

North Kansas City Hospital Board of Trustees v. St. Luke's Northland Hospital

984 S.W.2d 113 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Nov 3, 1998

Both the trial court and the Board rely heavily on Tribune Publishing Co. v. Curators of the Univ. of Missouri, 661 S.W.2d 575 (Mo.App. … Tipton v. Barton, 747 S.W.2d 325, 329 (Mo.App. E.D.1988).

Miller v. Tema Isenmann, Inc.

542 S.W.3d 265 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Mar 22, 2018

On TEMA's third appeal, however, the Board affirmed the ALJ. TEMA appealed the Board's decision to the Court of Appeals, which reversed. Miller appeals that decision to this Court as a matter of right. See Vessels v. … Brown, 354 S.W.3d 542 , 551 (Ky. 2011). With those guideposts in mind, we turn to the statutes at hand.

Hunter v. Hunter

314 S.W.3d 436 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jun 29, 2010

Hunter (Husband) appeals from the trial court’s amended judgment and decree of dissolution of marriage (amended judgment) dissolving his marriage to Yvonne Brown Hunter (Wife).

HHC Medical Group, P.C. v. City of Creve Coeur Board of Adjustment

99 S.W.3d 68 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Feb 25, 2003

and 536.110 and Wolfner v. … The Board also cross-appeals from the judgment. Standard of Review We review the decision of the Board, not the judgment of the trial court. Missouri Title Loans, Inc. v. City of St.

L. M. Rumsey Manufacturing Co. v. Inhabitants of the Town of Schell City

21 Mo. App. 175 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Mar 2, 1886

“On motion, the board then adjourned. “M. F. Brown, T. L. Strong, “ Clerk. Chairman, pro tern.” … So in Werth v.

Tuffli v. Board of Education of the Wentzville R-4 School District

603 S.W.2d 77 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jul 29, 1980

That statute gives a teacher the right to appeal the school board’s decision “to the circuit court of the county where the employing school. district is located”. … State Tax Commission v. Luten, 459 S.W.2d 375 [1] (Mo.banc 1970). A specific statute prevails over a general one. State, etc. v. Dickherber, 576 S.W.2d 532 [1] (Mo. banc 1979).

Kein v. School District

42 Mo. App. 460 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Dec 1, 1890

Luthy v. Woods, 1 Mo. App. 167 , was . where the board of directors of the St. … In Dodd, Brown & Co. v. Levy, 10 Mo. App. 121 , Judge Thompson' on referring to the case of Luthy v.

State ex rel. Ricker v. Trenton Junior College Board of Trustees

622 S.W.2d 787 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Sep 29, 1981

Standefer v. England, 328 S.W.2d 732, 737 (Mo.App.1959); State ex rel. Walton v. Miller, 297 S.W.2d 611, 615 (Mo.App.1956). … Porter v. Hudson, 226 Mo. 239 , 126 S.W. 733, 740 (1910); State ex rel. Cook v. Kelly, 142 S.W.2d 1091 , 1094 (Mo.App.1940).

Burton v. State

895 S.W.2d 648 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Mar 28, 1995

Brown v. State, 810 S.W.2d 716, 717 (Mo.App.1991). … See Barry v. State, 850 S.W.2d 348, 350 (Mo. banc 1993); Holloway v. State, 764 S.W.2d 163, 165 (Mo.App.1989).

Retirement Board of the Police Retirement System v. Noel ex rel. Noel

652 S.W.2d 874 · Missouri Court of Appeals · May 31, 1983

The court in Oates v. Safeco Ins. … Aversman v. Danner, supra, at 121, quoting Grissum v. Reesman, 505 S.W.2d 81, 86 (Mo.1974). Absent such proof, we must affirm the trial court’s finding that the burden had not been met. Murphy v.

Newberry v. Durand

87 Mo. App. 290 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Mar 4, 1901

Franklin v. Board of Education, 75 Mo. 408 ; Ins. Co. v. Seminary, 52 Mo. 480 . … Deutman v. Kilpatrick, 46 Mo. App. 624 ; Michael v. Ins. Co., 17 Mo. App. 23 ; Gaslight Co. v. St. Louis, 46 Mo. 121 ; Norton v. Bohart, 105 Mo. 615 .

State ex rel. Tucker v. McDonald

793 S.W.2d 616 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jul 10, 1990

Behrens v. Ebenrech, 784 S.W.2d 827, 828 (Mo.App.1990). … Brown v. Beuc, 384 S.W.2d 845, 853 (Mo.App.1964). Here, Tucker demonstrated unique circumstances not common to all property owners in the neighborhood.