Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersmoctapp

10,000+ results

1.70s

  • State Ex Rel. Sageser v. Ledbetter

    559 S.W.2d 230 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Oct 31, 1977

    Keystone Laundry and Dry Cleaners, Inc. v. McDonnell, 426 S.W.2d 11, 15 (5) (Mo.1968); State ex rel. M. B. v. Brown, 532 S.W.2d 893, 895 (2) (Mo.App.1976); State ex rel. Marcum v. … Brown, 385 S.W.2d 812, 819 (Mo.App.1964); Maddux v. Gardner, 239 Mo.App. 289, 298 , 192 S.W.2d 14, 19 (1945); Woolery v. Todd, Mo.App., 139 S.W.2d 1005 , 1007(2) (1940); Citizens’ Sec. Bank of Englewood v.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Crow Lumber & Building Materials Co. v. Washington County Library Board

    428 S.W.2d 758 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Apr 16, 1968

    In addition to the cases heretofore cited see McMillan v. Solomon, 42 Ala. 356 ; Buerger v. Boyd, 25 Ark. 441, 442 ; Ainsworth v. Ritt, 38 Cal. 89 ; Curtiss v. Hoyt (1848) 19 Conn. 154 , 48 Am.Dec. 149, 155; Sigal v. … South Omaha Ice & Coal Co., 50 Neb. 251 , 69 N.W. 785 , 36 L.R.A. 424 ; Winton v. Cornish, 5 Ohio 477 ; Harrington v. Watson, 11 Or. 143 , 3 P. 173 , 175, 50 Am.Rep. 465 ; Post v. Brown, 142 Tenn. 304, 307 ; Porter v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Smith v. Stoa

    899 S.W.2d 137 · Missouri Court of Appeals · May 23, 1995

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • State Board of Registration for the Healing Arts v. De Vore

    517 S.W.2d 480 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Oct 7, 1974

    State Board of Registration for the Healing Arts v. Finch, supra. … Section 161.-272; State Board of Registration for the Healing Arts v. Finch, supra.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Magenheim v. Board of Education of the School District of Riverview Gardens

    347 S.W.2d 409 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jun 14, 1961

    Bergmann et al. v. Board of Education of Normandy Consolidated School Dist. et al., 360 Mo. 644 , 230 S.W.2d 714 . … Wood v. Board of Education of City of St. Louis, 357 Mo. 147 , 206 S.W.2d 566, 568 , and in State ex rel. Brown et al. v. Board of Education of City of St.

    Cited 33 timesPublished
  • State v. Blaney

    801 S.W.2d 447 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Dec 4, 1990

    State v. Ring, 346 Mo. 290 , 141 S.W.2d 57, 64-5 (banc 1940); State v. Brown, 542 S.W.2d 789, 792 (Mo.App.1976). … State v. Falkner, supra; State v. Brown, supra.

    Abrogated on other grounds by State v. Withrow, 1999 Mo. LEXIS 75 (1999)Cited 14 timesPublished
  • State ex rel. Goodman v. St. Louis Board of Police Commissioners

    181 S.W.3d 156 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Nov 1, 2005

    Hunter v. Lippold, 142 S.W.3d 241, 242 (Mo.App. W.D.2004). … LaRocca v. LaRocca, 135 S.W.3d 522, 524 (Mo.App. E.D.2004).

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • The Executive Board of the Missouri Baptist Convention v. Missouri Baptist Foundation

    497 S.W.3d 785 · Missouri Court of Appeals · May 24, 2016

    In Executive Board of Missouri Baptist Convention v. Carnahan, 170 S.W.3d 437 (Mo. App. … Bone v.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Parish v. Novus Equities Co.

    231 S.W.3d 236 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jun 12, 2007

    The Homeowners subsequently filed their initial petition and their first amended petition against the City, Novus, Novus *240 Equities Company, Mainstreet at Sunset, L.L.C., Novus-Sunset, L.L.C., Jonathan Browne, Lisa Browne … Although the Homeowners’ second amended petition also named as defendants Novus Equities Company, No-vus Development Company, Mainstreet at Sunset, L.L.C., Novus-Sunset, L.L.C., Jonathan Browne, and Lisa Browne (collectively

    Cited 20 timesPublished
  • State v. Muhammad

    705 S.W.2d 110 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jan 28, 1986

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Kennedy v. Empire Gas Co.

    756 S.W.2d 945 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Sep 8, 1988

    Brown has not appeared on appeal to contend otherwise. Brown’s motion to dismiss was erroneously sustained. Empire Gas Corporation does contend the petition was properly dismissed. … Blades v. Cinder Block Co., 10 S.W.2d 319 , 320 (Mo.App.1928). Also see Aman Collection Service, Inc. v. Burgess, 612 S.W.2d 405 (Mo.App.1981); Martin v. Signal Dodge, Inc., 444 S.W.2d 29 (Mo.App.1969); Orona v.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Surendra Chaganti v. Missouri Board of Registration for the Healing Arts

    463 S.W.3d 391 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Mar 10, 2015

    State Board of Registration for Healing Arts, the Supreme Court recognized a definition of "unprofessional conduct" used in Perez v. State Board of Registration for Healing Arts, 803 S.W.2d 160, 164 (Mo. … See Merwin v. State Bd. of Registration for Healing Arts, 399 S.W.3d 110, 117 (Mo.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Gaydos Ex Rel. SS Peter & Paul's Catholic Church Cemetery Board v. Imhoff

    245 S.W.3d 303 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Feb 19, 2008

    Eisele v. Meyers, 929 S.W.2d 752, 755 (Mo.App.1996). … Klemme v. Best, 941 S.W.2d 493, 497 (Mo.banc 1997).

    Cited 11 timesPublished
  • Wilson v. Kansas City Southern Railway Co.

    122 Mo. App. 667 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jan 14, 1907

    [Nolan v. Johns, 126 Mo. 159, 166 ; Minter v. Bradstreet Co., 174 Mo. 444, 491 .] “The court is not required in a civil case to instruct on all questions whether suggested or not.” [Browning v. … App. 635 ; Construction Co. v. Railway, 71 Mo. App. 626 ; Schlotzhauer v. Railway, 89 Mo. App. 65 ; Brown v. Transit Co., 108 Mo. App. 310, 315 ; Lackland v. Railway, 101 Mo. App. 420, 428 .]

    Cited 11 timesPublished
  • Wilson ex rel. Wilson v. Stephens

    757 S.W.2d 297 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Sep 13, 1988

    Guthrie v. Brown Quarries, Inc., 741 S.W.2d 738, 739 [2] (Mo.App.1987). … In Kanagawa v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Mary L. Browning v. State of Missouri

    Missouri Court of Appeals · Mar 5, 2024

    Swallow v. … Barber v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Gamble v. Browning

    277 S.W.3d 723 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Dec 2, 2008

    , Missouri, police officers, and numerous former and current members of the Kansas City Board of Police Commissioners. … The Gambles have dismissed their claims against the police board defendants, and they are not parties on this appeal.

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • Board of Trustees of the Fountains at Moss Hollow Subdivision v. Shultz

    515 S.W.3d 822 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Feb 21, 2017

    ORDER PER CURIAM Appellant The Board of Trustees of the Fountains at Moss Hollow appeals the trial court’s amended judgment dismissing with prejudice its action against Respondents Damon and Amy Shultz. We affirm.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Rosenberg v. Shostak

    405 S.W.3d 8 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Mar 12, 2013

    Highfill v. Hale, 186 S.W.3d 277, 280 (Mo. banc 2006). “Collateral estoppel, or issue preclusion, is used to preclude the relitigation of an issue that already has been decided in a different cause of action.” Brown v. … Johns v. Kays, 181 S.W.3d 565, 566 (Mo. banc 2006). 4 A party may assert collateral es-toppel offensively or defensively. Brown, 370 S.W.3d at 659 .

    Cited 13 timesPublished
  • Muhammad v. State

    755 S.W.2d 15 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Aug 2, 1988

    Cited 0 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.