Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
1.70s
State Ex Rel. Sageser v. Ledbetter
559 S.W.2d 230 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Oct 31, 1977
Keystone Laundry and Dry Cleaners, Inc. v. McDonnell, 426 S.W.2d 11, 15 (5) (Mo.1968); State ex rel. M. B. v. Brown, 532 S.W.2d 893, 895 (2) (Mo.App.1976); State ex rel. Marcum v. … Brown, 385 S.W.2d 812, 819 (Mo.App.1964); Maddux v. Gardner, 239 Mo.App. 289, 298 , 192 S.W.2d 14, 19 (1945); Woolery v. Todd, Mo.App., 139 S.W.2d 1005 , 1007(2) (1940); Citizens’ Sec. Bank of Englewood v.
Cited 6 timesPublishedCrow Lumber & Building Materials Co. v. Washington County Library Board
428 S.W.2d 758 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Apr 16, 1968
In addition to the cases heretofore cited see McMillan v. Solomon, 42 Ala. 356 ; Buerger v. Boyd, 25 Ark. 441, 442 ; Ainsworth v. Ritt, 38 Cal. 89 ; Curtiss v. Hoyt (1848) 19 Conn. 154 , 48 Am.Dec. 149, 155; Sigal v. … South Omaha Ice & Coal Co., 50 Neb. 251 , 69 N.W. 785 , 36 L.R.A. 424 ; Winton v. Cornish, 5 Ohio 477 ; Harrington v. Watson, 11 Or. 143 , 3 P. 173 , 175, 50 Am.Rep. 465 ; Post v. Brown, 142 Tenn. 304, 307 ; Porter v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedState Board of Registration for the Healing Arts v. De Vore
517 S.W.2d 480 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Oct 7, 1974
State Board of Registration for the Healing Arts v. Finch, supra. … Section 161.-272; State Board of Registration for the Healing Arts v. Finch, supra.
Cited 4 timesPublishedMagenheim v. Board of Education of the School District of Riverview Gardens
347 S.W.2d 409 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jun 14, 1961
Bergmann et al. v. Board of Education of Normandy Consolidated School Dist. et al., 360 Mo. 644 , 230 S.W.2d 714 . … Wood v. Board of Education of City of St. Louis, 357 Mo. 147 , 206 S.W.2d 566, 568 , and in State ex rel. Brown et al. v. Board of Education of City of St.
Cited 33 timesPublished801 S.W.2d 447 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Dec 4, 1990
State v. Ring, 346 Mo. 290 , 141 S.W.2d 57, 64-5 (banc 1940); State v. Brown, 542 S.W.2d 789, 792 (Mo.App.1976). … State v. Falkner, supra; State v. Brown, supra.
Abrogated on other grounds by State v. Withrow, 1999 Mo. LEXIS 75 (1999)Cited 14 timesPublishedState ex rel. Goodman v. St. Louis Board of Police Commissioners
181 S.W.3d 156 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Nov 1, 2005
Hunter v. Lippold, 142 S.W.3d 241, 242 (Mo.App. W.D.2004). … LaRocca v. LaRocca, 135 S.W.3d 522, 524 (Mo.App. E.D.2004).
Cited 2 timesPublishedThe Executive Board of the Missouri Baptist Convention v. Missouri Baptist Foundation
497 S.W.3d 785 · Missouri Court of Appeals · May 24, 2016
In Executive Board of Missouri Baptist Convention v. Carnahan, 170 S.W.3d 437 (Mo. App. … Bone v.
Cited 6 timesPublished231 S.W.3d 236 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jun 12, 2007
The Homeowners subsequently filed their initial petition and their first amended petition against the City, Novus, Novus *240 Equities Company, Mainstreet at Sunset, L.L.C., Novus-Sunset, L.L.C., Jonathan Browne, Lisa Browne … Although the Homeowners’ second amended petition also named as defendants Novus Equities Company, No-vus Development Company, Mainstreet at Sunset, L.L.C., Novus-Sunset, L.L.C., Jonathan Browne, and Lisa Browne (collectively
Cited 20 timesPublished756 S.W.2d 945 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Sep 8, 1988
Brown has not appeared on appeal to contend otherwise. Brown’s motion to dismiss was erroneously sustained. Empire Gas Corporation does contend the petition was properly dismissed. … Blades v. Cinder Block Co., 10 S.W.2d 319 , 320 (Mo.App.1928). Also see Aman Collection Service, Inc. v. Burgess, 612 S.W.2d 405 (Mo.App.1981); Martin v. Signal Dodge, Inc., 444 S.W.2d 29 (Mo.App.1969); Orona v.
Cited 5 timesPublishedSurendra Chaganti v. Missouri Board of Registration for the Healing Arts
463 S.W.3d 391 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Mar 10, 2015
State Board of Registration for Healing Arts, the Supreme Court recognized a definition of "unprofessional conduct" used in Perez v. State Board of Registration for Healing Arts, 803 S.W.2d 160, 164 (Mo. … See Merwin v. State Bd. of Registration for Healing Arts, 399 S.W.3d 110, 117 (Mo.
Cited 0 timesPublishedGaydos Ex Rel. SS Peter & Paul's Catholic Church Cemetery Board v. Imhoff
245 S.W.3d 303 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Feb 19, 2008
Eisele v. Meyers, 929 S.W.2d 752, 755 (Mo.App.1996). … Klemme v. Best, 941 S.W.2d 493, 497 (Mo.banc 1997).
Cited 11 timesPublishedWilson v. Kansas City Southern Railway Co.
122 Mo. App. 667 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jan 14, 1907
[Nolan v. Johns, 126 Mo. 159, 166 ; Minter v. Bradstreet Co., 174 Mo. 444, 491 .] “The court is not required in a civil case to instruct on all questions whether suggested or not.” [Browning v. … App. 635 ; Construction Co. v. Railway, 71 Mo. App. 626 ; Schlotzhauer v. Railway, 89 Mo. App. 65 ; Brown v. Transit Co., 108 Mo. App. 310, 315 ; Lackland v. Railway, 101 Mo. App. 420, 428 .]
Cited 11 timesPublishedWilson ex rel. Wilson v. Stephens
757 S.W.2d 297 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Sep 13, 1988
Guthrie v. Brown Quarries, Inc., 741 S.W.2d 738, 739 [2] (Mo.App.1987). … In Kanagawa v.
Cited 2 timesPublishedMary L. Browning v. State of Missouri
Missouri Court of Appeals · Mar 5, 2024
Swallow v. … Barber v.
Cited 0 timesPublished277 S.W.3d 723 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Dec 2, 2008
, Missouri, police officers, and numerous former and current members of the Kansas City Board of Police Commissioners. … The Gambles have dismissed their claims against the police board defendants, and they are not parties on this appeal.
Cited 10 timesPublishedBoard of Trustees of the Fountains at Moss Hollow Subdivision v. Shultz
515 S.W.3d 822 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Feb 21, 2017
ORDER PER CURIAM Appellant The Board of Trustees of the Fountains at Moss Hollow appeals the trial court’s amended judgment dismissing with prejudice its action against Respondents Damon and Amy Shultz. We affirm.
Cited 0 timesPublished405 S.W.3d 8 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Mar 12, 2013
Highfill v. Hale, 186 S.W.3d 277, 280 (Mo. banc 2006). “Collateral estoppel, or issue preclusion, is used to preclude the relitigation of an issue that already has been decided in a different cause of action.” Brown v. … Johns v. Kays, 181 S.W.3d 565, 566 (Mo. banc 2006). 4 A party may assert collateral es-toppel offensively or defensively. Brown, 370 S.W.3d at 659 .
Cited 13 timesPublished
Ask Donna