Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
4.03s
156 Mo. 597 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jun 12, 1900
Branham, but avers that such action on the part of said Walton and Branham in giving said defendant Blakey such statement was without the knowledge, authority or consent of the board of directors of said Bank of Salisbury … [Hageman v. Moreland, 33 Mo. 86 ; Layton v. Riney, 33 Mo. 86 ; Poe v. Dominic, 46 Mo. 118 ; State ex rel. v. Gaddy, 83 Mo. 138 .]
Cited 5 timesPublishedKlasing v. Fred Schmitt Contracting Co.
335 Mo. 721 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jul 17, 1934
[Kemper v. … [Kemper v. Gluck, supra.]
Cited 13 timesPublished90 Mo. 25 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Oct 15, 1886
. — Defendant is the administrator of *26 the estate of Joseph Brown, deceased, formerly assignee of,the Warrensburg Savings Bank. … The case of Fellows v. Greenleaf, 43 N.
Cited 22 timesPublished717 S.W.2d 847 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Oct 14, 1986
See State v. Brown, 547 S.W.2d 797, 798-800 (Mo.banc 1977), finding reversible error because counsel was not permitted to ask about jurors’ attitudes toward self-defense instructions. … The court’s ruling is supported by State v. Smith, 422 S.W.2d 50, 68 (Mo.banc 1967) cert. denied, 393 U.S. 895 , 89 S.Ct. 150 , 21 L.Ed.2d 276 (1968), and by State v. Beatty, 617 S.W.2d 87, 92 (Mo.App.1981).
Cited 10 timesPublished278 Mo. 99 · Supreme Court of Missouri · May 16, 1919
Real Property (5 Ed.), 282; Haverstick’s Appeal, 103 Pa. *115 St. 394; Warn v. Brown, 102 Pa. St. 347.]” … To the saipe effect: Brown v. Tuschoff, 235 Mo. 458 .
Cited 15 timesPublished250 Mo. 308 · Supreme Court of Missouri · May 20, 1913
[State v. Kyle, 166 Mo. 287 .] … Brown, P. J., concurs; Faris, J., concurs in result only.
Cited 6 timesPublished242 Mo. 195 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Mar 21, 1912
[State v. McClain, 137 Mo. 307 ; State v. Snyder, 98 Mo. 555 ; State v. Nagel, 136 Mo. 45 .] … It. is so ordered, Kefmish and Brown, JJ., concur.
Cited 1 timesPublished324 S.W.2d 714 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jun 8, 1959
State v. Sanders, 106 Mo. 188 , 17 S.W. 223 ; State v. West, 69 Mo. 401 ; State v. Hartwell, Mo.Sup., 293 S.W.2d 313 . … State v. Kenyon, 343 Mo. 1168 , 126 S.W.2d 245 ; Holland v. Anderson, Mo.Sup., 196 S.W.2d 175 .
Cited 12 timesPublished353 Mo. 791 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jan 2, 1945
State v. Rader, 262 Mo. 117 , 171 S. W. 46 ; State v. Tipton, 307 Mo. 500 , 271 S. W. 55 ; State v. Price, 348 Mo. 361 , 153 S. … State v. Criger (Mo.), 46 S. W. (2d) 537 ; State v. Crawford (Mo.), 289 S. W. 961 .
Cited 9 timesPublished691 S.W.2d 267 · Supreme Court of Missouri · May 29, 1985
Tennessee v. Garner, — U.S. -, 105 S.Ct. 1694 , 85 L.Ed.2d 1 (1985). Phillips seized defendant when he ordered her out of the car. Brown v. Texas, 443 U.S. 47 , 99 S.Ct. 2637 , 61 L.Ed.2d 357 (1979). … State v. Perry, 499 S.W.2d 473 (Mo. 1973); State v. Cole, 662 S.W.2d 297 (Mo.App.1983). .Defendant’s case citations are distinguishable. In Kansas City v.
Cited 25 timesPublished502 S.W.2d 359 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Dec 10, 1973
State v. Richardson, supra. … Arbeiter v. Reagan, 427 S.W.2d 371, 377 [4] (Mo. banc 1968) ; State v. Williams, 473 S.W.2d 382 (Mo.1971).
Cited 4 timesPublishedTerry v. St. Louis & San Francisco Railway Co.
89 Mo. 586 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Oct 15, 1886
the first and fourth counts of the petition, and they need not be noticed further than to say, the first is based upon alleged negligence in employing an incompetent engineer, and the second for failure to erect a sign board … Van Note v. Railroad, 70 Mo. 641; Turner v. Railroad, 78 Mo. 578 .
Cited 7 timesPublishedHauber v. Halls Levee District
497 S.W.2d 175 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jul 16, 1973
Abeles v. Wurdack, 285 S.W. 2d 544 (Mo.1955); Smith v. Preis, 396 S. W.2d 636 (Mo.1965). In Norwood v. … The levee district and board of supervisors, plaintiffs in the first action, are defendants in the second action. Willie Hauber, a party defendant in the first, is a party plaintiff in the second.
Cited 2 timesPublished336 Mo. 213 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Dec 21, 1934
In Earles v. … [Trask v.
Cited 20 timesPublishedManufacturers Bank & Trust Co. of St. Louis v. Arno
490 S.W.2d 98 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Feb 12, 1973
Both Oliver and Dolores deposited a brown envelope in the box and the box was locked without the money being counted. … See Albright v. Davis, Mo.App., 64 S.W.2d 121 , 124.
Cited 1 timesPublishedSiemers v. St. Louis Electric Terminal Railway Co.
343 Mo. 1201 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Mar 8, 1939
Street north of Morgan and alongside appellants’ property, as shown in detailed plans referred to as having theretofore been approved by said board. … Louis v. Beck, 333 Mo. 1118 , 63 S.
Cited 5 timesPublished119 Mo. 495 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jan 31, 1894
Brown said that the charge went in just below the ear and came out about the same place on the opposite side. Mr. … C. 45; Rex v. Merceron, 2 Starkie, 366; Josephine v. State, 39 Miss. 613 -650. In Regina v.
Cited 70 timesPublishedLippard v. Houdaille Industries, Inc.
715 S.W.2d 491 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Aug 1, 1986
The blades of the machine were protected by a metal guard which was designed to close after the board being planed had cleared the cutterhead. … A board slipped out of the plaintiffs hand and he reached down to catch it as it fell.
Cited 75 timesPublishedWilliams Ex Rel. Williams v. Kansas City
274 S.W.2d 261 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jan 10, 1955
Beebe v. Kansas City, 327 Mo. 67 , 34 S.W.2d 57 ; Beebe v. Kansas City, 223 Mo.App. 642 , 17 S.W.2d 608 ; Bethel v. City of St. Joseph, 184 Mo.App. 388 , 171 S.W. 42 ; Warren v. … Brown v. Moore, Mo., 248 S.W.2d 553, 559 . There is no claim that the issues of liability and of damages are not separable. Wright v. Estep, 194 Va. 332 , 73 S.E.2d 371 .
Cited 10 timesPublished118 Mo. 418 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Dec 7, 1893
Carter v. Carter, 44 Mo. 195 ; Coffin v. Bucknam, 3 Fairfield (Me.) 471. … Snyder v. Free, 114 Mo. 360 ; Morris v. Barnes’ Adm’r 35 Mo. 412 ; Hart v. Hart’s Adm’r, 41 Mo. 441 ; Guenther v. Birkicht’s Adm’r, 22 Mo. 439 ; Aull Savings Bank v. Aull’s Adm’r, 80 Mo. 199 . The judgment is affirmed.
Cited 21 timesPublished
Ask Donna