Case law

State v. Tatman

312 Mo. 134 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Dec 22, 1925

In Equitable Life Insurance Society v. Brown, 187 U.S. 311 , it was ruled: "But it is settled that not every mere allegation of a Federal question will suffice to give jurisdiction. … In State v.

State v. Swain

239 Mo. 723 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Feb 6, 1912

Defendant cites People v. Smith, 99 N. Y. Supp. 118 ; Banker v. People, 37 *730 Mich. 4 ; Wellar v. People, 30 Mich. 16 , hut those cases do not sustain his contention. VI. … Kennish and Brown, JJ., concur.

Joplin Water Works Co. v. Jasper County

327 Mo. 964 · Supreme Court of Missouri · May 21, 1931

Chief Justice TANEY, said in Lord v. … Sedalia Water Co. v.

Sam Kraus Co. v. State Highway Commission of Missouri

416 S.W.2d 639 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jul 10, 1967

Martin v. Potashnick, 358 Mo. 833 , 217 S.W.2d 379, 381 . … In support of its contention that the ten-year statute is applicable plaintiff has cited South Side Realty Co. v. Hamblin, Mo.App., 387 S.W.2d 224 , Brown v. Irving, Mo.App., 269 S.W. 686 , Martin v.

Wiggins v. Coy

462 S.W.2d 751 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Feb 8, 1971

The State offered in evidence a birth certificate of the Bureau of Vital Statistics of the Arkansas State Board of Health, signed by Gerald K. … See Lynde v. Western & Southern Life Insurance Co., Mo.App., 293 S.

Jones v. Garden Park Homes Corporation

393 S.W.2d 501 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Sep 13, 1965

By paragraph (7) a board of trustees was appointed to consist of three individuals, and it was stated that the board “shall have the following rights and authority to wit: * * * (e) to exercise such control over the easements … Louis v. Baumann, 348 Mo. 164 , 153 S.W.2d 31 ; Hernandez v. Prieto, 349 Mo. 658 , 162 S.W.2d 829 ; Branch v. Lee, Mo., 159 S.W.2d 677 ; Levine v. Humphreys, 297 Mo. 555 , 249 S.W. 395 ; Savings Trust Co. of St.

Kane v. Roath

310 Mo. 684 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Oct 9, 1925

[Utter v. Sidman, 170 Mo. 284 ; Owen v. Trail, 302 Mo. 292 .] This is not a case wherein, as in Owen v. … The facts existent in McDowell v. Brown, 21 Mo. 57 , another case cited, are so different from those in this case that we can see no direct bearing or persuasive force therein, applicable to this case. In Tennison v.

Glueck Realty Company v. City of St. Louis

318 S.W.2d 206 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Nov 10, 1958

Plaintiff cited the case of City of Kirkwood v. … Kansas City Bridge Co. v. Terte, 345 Mo. 95 , 131 S.W.2d 587 , 124 A.L.R. 1331 ; Joplin Consolidated Mining Co. v. City of Joplin, 124 Mo. 129 , 27 S.W. 406 ; Cavanaugh v.

Peter v. Byrne

175 Mo. 233 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jun 9, 1903

[Huff v. Price, 50 Mo. 228 ; City v. Anderson, 78 Mo. 87 ; Brown v. Dressler, 125 Mo. 589 .] … [Little v. Weston, 1 Mass. 156 ; Fisher v. Leslie, 1 Es. Cases 426.]

State ex rel. Gavin v. Gill

688 S.W.2d 370 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Apr 2, 1985

In Anderson v. … See Clements v. Fashing, 457 U.S. 957 , 102 S.Ct. 2836 , 73 L.Ed.2d 508 (1982); Storer v. Brown, 415 U.S. 724 , 94 S.Ct. 1274 , 39 L.Ed.2d 714 (1974); San Antonio School Dist. v.

State Ex Rel. Nixon v. Jaynes

63 S.W.3d 210 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Dec 4, 2001

Osowski v. Purkett, 908 S.W.2d 690, 691 (Mo. banc 1995). 4 . See Brown v. … Since Warren’s habeas petition does not make a “not knowing” claim, we do not reach the question of whether the exception recognized in Brown v. Gammon survives Clay v. Donnire, 37 S.W.3d 214 (Mo. banc 2000). 5 .

Pointer v. Mountain Railway Construction Co.

269 Mo. 104 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Dec 4, 1916

L., sec. 713, p. 74; 29 Cyc. 591 and cases cited; Sweeney v. Erving, 228 U. S. 233 ; Brown v. Railway, 256 Mo. 522 ; Dougherty v. Railway, 81 Mo. 325 ; Gallagher v. Edison Illuminating Co., 72 Mo. … Railway, 183 Mo. l. c. 606; Whittaker’s Smith on Neg., p. 552; Turner v. Haar, 114 Mo. l. c. 346-7; Hughes v. Railway, L. R. A. 1916A, p. 927, and notes page 930 et seq.” Of the Missouri cases first:. In Brown v.

Scott v. Gray

337 S.W.2d 38 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jul 11, 1960

Clemons v. Becker, Mo.Sup., 283 S.W.2d 449, 451 . In the case of Bloch v. … And see Pitts v. Garner, Mo.Sup., 321 S.W.2d 509, 519 . Appellant cites Brown v. Clancy, Dist. of Columbia, D.C.Mun.App., 43 A.2d 296, 298 ; Fisher v. Wichita Transp.

Treadway v. State

988 S.W.2d 508 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Apr 13, 1999

Louis County, 816 S.W.2d 219, 222 (Mo. banc 1991); Manchester Fire Protection District v. St. Louis County Board of Election Commissioners, 555 S.W.2d 297, 298 (Mo. banc 1977); Bopp v. … City of Ellisville v. St. Louis County Board of Election Commissioners, 877 S.W.2d 620 (Mo. banc 1994).

State v. Plassard

355 Mo. 90 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jun 10, 1946

The crime was held to be a felony in State v. Brown, 306 Mo. 532 , 267 S. W. 864 . … State v. Evans, 124 Mo. 397 , 28 S. W. 8 ; State v. Matthews, 148 Mo. 185 , 49 S. W. 1085 , 71 Am. St. Rep. 594 ; Davis v. Modern Woodmen, 98 Mo. App. 713, 720 , 73 S. W. 923 .” State v. Lipp, 130 Mo. App. 398 , 110 S.

State Ex Rel. Wors v. Hostetter

343 Mo. 945 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Feb 7, 1939

Saunders v. Workmen's Compensation Commission, 333 Mo. 691 , 697, 63 S.W.2d 67 , 69, to sustain his contention, and says respondents' opinion contravenes that decision. … But the opinion took notice of another case: Brown v. Corn Products Refining Co. (Mo.

Tritz v. City of Kansas

84 Mo. 634 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Oct 15, 1884

Eric v. Schwingle, 22 Penn. 384 ; Morrs v. Utica, 17 N. Y. 104 ; Conrad v. Ithaca, 16 N. Y. 159 ; Browning v. Springfield, 17 Ill. 143 ; Smoot v. Mayor, 24 Ala. 112 , and various other authorities. … This doctrine was approved in Brown v. Glasgow, 57 Mo. 157, and in Craig v. Sedalia, 63 Mo. 417 .

Frisco Employes' Hospital Ass'n v. State Tax Commission

381 S.W.2d 772 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jul 13, 1964

Louis-San Francisco Railway Company (sometimes herein referred to as the Railroad), appointed the majority of the Board of Trustees. … Ever since an amendment of the bylaws in 1940 the employe representatives have constituted a majority of the Board.

School District v. Phoenix Land & Improvement Co.

315 Mo. 775 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Oct 8, 1926

Co. v. Pfau, supra; Mo. Pac. Ry. Co. v. Roberts, 187 Mo. l. c. 319.] … Hilleman v.

State v. Young

119 Mo. 495 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jan 31, 1894

Brown said that the charge went in just below the ear and came out about the same place on the opposite side. Mr. … C. 45; Rex v. Merceron, 2 Starkie, 366; Josephine v. State, 39 Miss. 613 -650. In Regina v.