Case law

State v. Wells

639 S.W.2d 563 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Aug 23, 1982

The court at 5:02 a. m. gave the jury instruction No. 14, which was MAI-CR2d 4.50, commonly known as the “Kerry Brown” instruction. … The “Kerry Brown” instruction informs the jury that if it can agree on guilt but not punishment, then the court will fix the punishment. It is within the discretion of the trial court to give this instruction. State v.

City of Edina Ex Rel. Pioneer Trust Co. v. School District

305 Mo. 452 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Nov 25, 1924

Louis v. … Louis v. Brown, 155 Mo. 545 , and Mullins v. Mount St. Mary's Cemetery Assn., 239 Mo. 689 .

Bachtel v. Miller County Nursing Home District

110 S.W.3d 799 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jul 29, 2003

Eagleton v. … For instance, H.S. v. Board of Regents, Southeast Mo. State Univ., 967 S.W.2d 665 (Mo.App.

Lake Tishomingo Property Owners Ass'n v. Cronin

679 S.W.2d 852 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Nov 20, 1984

Rippe v. Sutter, 292 S.W.2d 86 (Mo. 1956). … See Weatherby Lake Improvement Co. v. Sherman, 611 S.W.2d 326 (Mo.App.1980).

Steines v. Steines

338 Mo. 335 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jan 11, 1936

She cites Reed v. Cooke, 331 Mo. 507 , 55 S. W. (2d) 275 . … She told him to leave and board with his cousin Emma. He told her tha,t he did not have the money to pay board. He had his old furniture moved from the home to his old home on Fifth Street.

Wood v. Nortman

85 Mo. 298 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Oct 15, 1884

See Jones v. Manly, 58 Mo. 559 . … Templeton et al. v. Wolf, 19 Mo. 101 ; Lawrence v. Shreve, 26 Mo. 492 .

Sexton v. Jenkins & Associates, Inc.

152 S.W.3d 270 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Dec 7, 2004

Hartman v. Kintz, 832 S.W.2d 9, 10 (Mo.App.1992). This immunity extends to any employee charged with carrying out the employer’s duties. State ex rel. Badami v. Gaertner, 630 S.W.2d 175, 180 (Mo.App. *275 1982). … The guardrail was made with 1" x 4" boards instead of the required 2" x 4" boards. The wood was decayed. The small, decayed boards were nailed together the wrong way with nails that were too small to support a worker.

Missouri Pacific Railroad v. Whitehead & Kales Co.

566 S.W.2d 466 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Apr 28, 1978

The other driver, Brown, came around the curve at an excessive speed, failed to see the stopped car and ran into it, injuring Crouch’s passenger, who filed suit against Brown. … Yet Crouch, despite his unquestioned contribution to the accident, could not be brought into the case by Brown, because the latter’s negligence was declared to be “active”. In Fields v.

Garden of Eden Drainage District v. Bartlett Trust Co.

330 Mo. 554 · Supreme Court of Missouri · May 27, 1932

The power of levying taxes is vested in the board of supervisors after the corporate district is organized. … [Hodge v. Muscatine County, 196 U.S. 276 , 49 L.Ed. 477 ; Bartlett Trust Co. v.

Hardwicke v. Wurmser

264 Mo. 138 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Mar 2, 1915

In the later case of Brown v. M. K. & T. Ry. … [Ash v. Independence, 145 Mo. 120 ; Ibid., 169 Mo. 77 ; Parlin & Orendorff Co. v. Hoard, 145 Mo. 117 ; Vaughn v. Railroad, 145 Mo. l. c. 61; Shewalter v. Railroad, 152 Mo. 544 ; Coleman v.

State Ex Rel. McKinley Publishing Co. v. Hackmann

314 Mo. 33 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Apr 9, 1926

There is nothing in the rulings in the case of State ex rel. v. … V.

State Ex Rel. City of St. Louis v. Hall

335 Mo. 1097 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Oct 18, 1934

The empowering of the Board of Aldermen to give a period of grace after the filing of judgment before the benefit assessments need be paid, contained in section 8. “14. … The provision for estimates of benefits and damages by the Board of Public Service, contained in a new section 1-a. *1102 “16.

State v. Neibekier

184 Mo. 211 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Nov 22, 1904

.- One Peter Winosky and his wife kept a boarding-house in the village. … [McDonald v. State, 80 Wis. 407 ; People v. McLeod, 1 Hill (N. Y.) 377; Ibid v. Ibid, 25 Wend. 483 ; Campbell v. Hall, Cowp. 208; Vattel, bk. 2, ch. 8, secs. 101, 102; Story on Conflict of Laws, 518.]

Orphant v. St. Louis State Hospital, Division of Mental Diseases

441 S.W.2d 355 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Apr 14, 1969

, board of education, regents, curators, managers or control commission, board or any other political subdivision, corporation, or quasi *360 corporation, or cities under special charter, or under the commission form of government … See also Lawson v. Lawson, Mo.App., 415 S.W.2d 313,1 . c. 317-320, for a detailed discussion of Pruitt v.

Collector of Revenue v. Parcels of Land Encumbered With Delinquent Taxes

362 Mo. 1054 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Feb 11, 1952

It was pointed out in Collector of Revenue v. … Gen. v. Mo. Utilities Co., 339 Mo. 385, 404 (10), 96 SW. (2d) 607, 616 (14); State ex inf. Shartel, Atty. Gen. v. Mo. Utilities Co., 331 Mo. 337, 352 (7), 53 SW. (2d) 394, 400 (11); City of St. Joseph v. St. J. Term.

State ex rel. American Manufacturing Co. v. Reynolds

270 Mo. 589 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Apr 28, 1917

Brown, J., in that case assumed as true, without discussing the question of duress. … We can well say, as in American Manufacturing Co. v. City of St.

In Re Estate of Hoffman

490 S.W.2d 98 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Feb 12, 1973

Both Oliver and Dolores deposited a brown envelope in the box and the box was locked without the money being counted. … See Albright v. Davis, Mo.App., 64 S.W.2d 121 , 124.

Young v. Downey

145 Mo. 261 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jun 28, 1898

Aull, 80 Mo. 199 ; Hood v. Mathis, 21 Mo. 308 ; Cohen v. Kyler, 27 Mo. 122 ; Hunton v. Powers, 38 Mo. 353 ; Edmonson v. Kite, 43 Mo. 176 , and authorities cited. … Tyler on Ejectment, 838, 839, 840; Hughes v. Carson, 90 Mo. 399 . No such action can be maintained in this State against a defendant in actual possession of the land. Cochran v. Whitesides, 34 Mo. 417 ; Brown v.

Terry v. St. Louis & San Francisco Railway Co.

89 Mo. 586 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Oct 15, 1886

the first and fourth counts of the petition, and they need not be noticed further than to say, the first is based upon alleged negligence in employing an incompetent engineer, and the second for failure to erect a sign board … Van Note v. Railroad, 70 Mo. 641; Turner v. Railroad, 78 Mo. 578 .

Lewis v. Schwenn

93 Mo. 26 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Oct 15, 1887

Hunter v. Hunter, 50 Mo. 445; Rogers v. Brown, 61 Mo. 187; Buren v. Buren, 79 Mo. 538 . … Chouteau v. Burlando, supra; Cape Girardeau Co. v. Harbison, supra; Wood v. Augustine, 61 Mo. 46 .