Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
3.32s
361 Mo. 1220 · Supreme Court of Missouri · May 14, 1951
The mere failure of one attempt might not be sufficient (Compare: Lowe v. Brown, 22 Ohio S. 463), but the number of *1231 attempts is certainly not the determinative factor. … Herrmann v. Gleason, 126 F. (2) 936, 940; Union Trust Co. v. Board of Education, 348 Ill. 256 , 180 N. E. 819, 824 ; Tobey Furn. Co. v. Rowe, supra; Kaufmann v. Liggett, supra.
Cited 14 timesPublished189 Mo. 375 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jun 15, 1905
Chapman, members of the Board of Health of said city, defendants. The petition is in five counts. … Co. v. Marr, 168 Mo. 252 ; Seay v. Sanders, 88 Mo. App. 478 .] For this reason the motion of respondents to dismiss the appeal will be sustained and the appeal dismissed. All concur.
Cited 11 timesPublishedBarb v. Farmers Insurance Exchange
281 S.W.2d 297 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jul 11, 1955
In McCloskey v. … This work necessitated extending her arm and reaching high above her head in marking the top of the board, and at times she was obliged to get down on her knees in reaching and marking the lower part of the board.
Cited 63 timesPublishedValley Spring Hog Ranch Co. v. Plagmann
282 Mo. 1 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Apr 1, 1920
Thus in State v. … In State v.
Cited 31 timesPublishedSwigert v. Hannibal & St. Joseph Railroad
75 Mo. 475 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Apr 15, 1882
This is an action to recover damages for personal injuries received by the plaintiff in attempting to board one of the defendant’s passenger trains. … Nelson v. R. R. Co., 68 Mo. 593 .
Cited 18 timesPublished252 Mo. 568 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Nov 24, 1913
Brown, 165 Mo. 1 . c. 39, throw a clear light on the question and may be consulted with profit. … Woodson, Graves, Brown, Walker and Baris, JJ., concur; Bond, J., dissents in an opinion filed.
Cited 21 timesPublished307 Mo. 172 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Mar 12, 1925
In Clark v. … The reference to the fence now standing on the land is a sufficient designation of one side of the strip, but `Brown's survey' is too indefinite, and `varying width' is too indefinite." In Benne v.
Cited 14 timesPublishedBell v. May Department Stores Co.
6 S.W.3d 871 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Nov 23, 1999
Paramount Sales Co., Inc. v. Stark, 690 S.W.2d 500, 504 (Mo.App.1985) (finding buyer properly rejected goods). 17 . See Brown v. P.N. Hirsch & Co. … See Rice v.
Cited 24 timesPublished975 S.W.2d 121 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Sep 22, 1998
State v. Brown, 949 S.W.2d 639, 642 (Mo.App. E.D.1997). Appellant himself testified that “When the ear come to a stop, I bailed out, was running.” Appellant was not prejudiced by this evidence. … Brown, 902 S.W.2d at 295 .
Cited 196 timesPublished98 Mo. 482 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Apr 15, 1889
.; Brown v. State, 18 Ohio St. 496 ; Gravatt v. State, 25 Ohio St. 162 ; Campbell v. State, 35 Ohio St. 70 . … Commonwealth v. Tenney, 97 Mass. 50 ; Commonwealth v. Tuckerman, 10 Gray, 173 ; State v. Leicham, 41 Wis. 565 .
Cited 27 timesPublished347 Mo. 175 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jan 4, 1941
First Bank Corporation v. … Co., 4 Board of Tax Appeals, 853; In Appeal of Estate of McKinnon, 6 Board of Tax Appeals, 412; In Appeal of Codrington, 6 Board of Tax Appeals, 413.] In Appeal of Standard Marine Ins.
Cited 14 timesPublishedRyder v. County of St. Charles
552 S.W.2d 705 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jun 14, 1977
The firemen requested the mayor to act pursuant to the Firemen’s Arbitration Board Act and appoint an arbitration board to resolve the dispute. … When he refused, the firemen sought mandamus to compel him to appoint the board.
Cited 19 timesPublishedState Ex Rel. Leggett v. Jensen
318 S.W.2d 353 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Nov 10, 1958
State Tax Commission v. Walsh, supra. … We said in Wood v.
Cited 56 timesPublishedBidwell v. St. Louis Floating Dock & Insurance
40 Mo. 42 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Mar 15, 1867
Co. v. Crane, 16 Md. 260 ; Brown v. Roger Wms. Ins. Co., 5 R. I. 394; but the assignee in such case can have no greater or superior rights than the assured. In the case of Wallingford v. Home Mut. &c. Ins. … Y., supra; Carpenter v. Providence Ins. Co., 16 Pet. 495 ; Foster v. Equitable Fire Ins. Co., 2 Gray, 216 . *48 The court committed no error in allowing Scott to testify.
Cited 11 timesPublishedMaupin v. Virginia Lead Mining Co.
78 Mo. 24 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Apr 15, 1883
Under the rulings of this court,, the managing and other head officers of a corporation, without a formal resolution of the board to that effect, can employ counsel to prosecute or defend suits for the corporation. … Western Bank of Mo. v. Gilstrap, 45 Mo. 419; Turner v. Railroad Co., 61 Mo. 501 ; Southgate v. Railroad Co., 61 Mo. 89 ; Thompson v. School Dist., 71 Mo. 495 .
Cited 8 timesPublishedHarrell v. Total Health Care, Inc.
781 S.W.2d 58 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Dec 12, 1989
In State Board of Registration v. … State Board of Registration for the Healing Arts v. Giffen, 651 S.W.2d 475 (Mo. banc 1983). . State ex inf. Dalton ex rel. Holekamp v. Holekamp Lumber Co., 340 S.W.2d 678 (Mo. banc 1960). . Blue Cross Hosp.
Cited 17 timesPublishedPowell v. Union Pacific Railroad
255 Mo. 420 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Mar 3, 1914
Browning v. Railroad, 124 Mo. 55 , was in Banc. … The Browning case has been followed early and late on the identical point—e. g. King v. St. Louis, 250 *455 Mo. l. c. 514; Harmon v. Donohoe, 153 Mo. l. c. 275; Smith v. Fordyce, 190 Mo. l. c. 30-1; Waddell v.
Cited 49 timesPublishedState ex rel. Smith v. County Court
83 Mo. 539 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Oct 15, 1884
It is also held in the above cited case that the case of Boisliniere v. … Board of County Commissioners, 32 Mo. 375 , where it was held that under the statutes of 1855 then in force it was the duty of the coroner .and not that of the court to decide the propriety of the inquest, was not now in
Cited 5 timesPublished212 Mo. 132 · Supreme Court of Missouri · May 19, 1908
In State v. … [State v. Brown, 206 Mo. 501 .]
Cited 3 timesPublishedDunklin County v. District County Court of Dunklin County
23 Mo. 449 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Oct 15, 1856
The grant of the sixteenth sections in the state of Michigan was to the state for the use of schools, and in Cooper v. … In Long & Long v.
Cited 32 timesPublished
Ask Donna