Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
0.89s
252 Mo. 53 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jun 28, 1913
BROWN, P. J. Action for personal injuries. From a judgment for plaintiff defendant appeals. … Kinsey v. Messerly, 198 Mo. 351 .
Cited 6 timesPublished351 Mo. 271 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jun 7, 1943
McKittriek v. Dwyer, supra, the City of St. … Dietrich v. Danes et al., 315 Mo. 701 , 287 S.
Cited 12 timesPublishedHuffman ex rel. Huffman v. Young
478 S.W.2d 332 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Apr 10, 1972
Mossinghoff, J & Company, Mo., 345 S.W.2d 148 ; Price v. Seidler, Mo., 408 S.W.2d 815 and Hodges v. Johnson, supra. Plaintiff suggests Cotant v. United States (D.C.Idaho), 103 F.Supp. 770 ; Meares v. … Joly v. Wippler, Mo., 449 S.W.2d 565, 571 . Nevertheless, our approach to the problem was delineated clearly in Brown v.
Cited 4 timesPublished335 Mo. 261 · Supreme Court of Missouri · May 17, 1934
BROWN "OBIE WILLIAMS." … In State ex rel. v.
Cited 4 timesPublishedCarter v. Matthey Laundry & Dry Cleaning Co.
330 S.W.2d 771 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Dec 14, 1959
Corporations § 7, p. 385; May Department Stores Co. v. Union Electric Light & Power Co., 341 Mo. 299 , 107 S.W.2d 41, 55 [11]. … Moore v. Southwestern Bell Telephone Co., supra, 301 S.W.2d 823 . Plaintiff’s verdict on count 3 was for $14,000 against Matthey and National, Inc.
Cited 6 timesPublishedBeatty v. Metropolitan St. Louis Sewer District
867 S.W.2d 217 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Dec 21, 1993
Louis County to appoint a six-member board of trustees to operate MSD. The plan also gave that board authority to impose ad valorem taxes and establish charges for sewer services. … Beatty v. Metropolitan St. Louis Sewer District, 731 S.W.2d 318 (Mo.App.1987) (en banc).
Cited 19 timesPublished429 S.W.2d 697 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jul 8, 1968
The situation is comparable to that in State v. Thomas, Mo., 360 S.W.2d 694, 699 . … In State v.
Cited 9 timesPublished459 S.W.2d 359 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Nov 9, 1970
In State v. … State v. Townley, 147 Mo. 205 , 48 S.W. 833 .” In Meyer v.
Cited 20 timesPublishedMissouri Electric Power v. City of Mountain Grove
352 Mo. 262 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jan 3, 1944
Ballew v. … Jur., Contempt, secs. 24 and 26, pp. 405-408; Brownfield v. Bash, 340 Mo. 828 , 102 S.W.2d 880 ; State ex rel. Hyde v. Westhues, 316 Mo. 457 , 290 S.W. 443 ; Russell v. Lill (Mo. App.), 12 S.W.2d 508 .
Cited 16 timesPublished248 Mo. 98 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Feb 28, 1913
[Dean v. Railroad, 199 Mo. l. c. 411; Zeis v. Brewing Ass’n, 205 Mo. l. c. 651; Brady v. Railroad, 206 Mo. l. c. 537; Buckner v. Horse & Mule Co., 221 Mo. l. c. 710; Woodson v. Railroad, 224 Mo. l. c. 707.] … Louis, 161 Mo. l. c. 437, et seq., and cases cited; Woods v. Kansas City, 58 Mo. App. 272 ; Bassett v. St. Joseph, 53 Mo. 290 ; Lore v. Am. Mfg. Co., 160 Mo. l. c. 626; Vogelgesang v. St. Louis, 139 Mo. l. c. 136.]
Cited 27 timesPublishedMissouri Pacific Railroad v. Whitehead & Kales Co.
566 S.W.2d 466 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Apr 28, 1978
The other driver, Brown, came around the curve at an excessive speed, failed to see the stopped car and ran into it, injuring Crouch’s passenger, who filed suit against Brown. … Yet Crouch, despite his unquestioned contribution to the accident, could not be brought into the case by Brown, because the latter’s negligence was declared to be “active”. In Fields v.
Overruled in part by Travelers Property Casualty Co. of America v. Manitowoc Co., 2013 Mo. LEXIS 9 (2013)Cited 128 timesPublishedCity of Edina Ex Rel. Pioneer Trust Co. v. School District
305 Mo. 452 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Nov 25, 1924
Louis v. … Louis v. Brown, 155 Mo. 545 , and Mullins v. Mount St. Mary's Cemetery Assn., 239 Mo. 689 .
Cited 15 timesPublished443 S.W.2d 144 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jun 9, 1969
Lupkey v. … Andres v. Brown, Mo., 300 S.W.2d 800, 801 [1], This rule is applicable to court-tried as well as jury-tried cases. Long v. Stilwell Homes, Inc., Mo.App., 333 S.W.2d 103, 106 [9].
Cited 12 timesPublishedState ex rel. Jenkins v. Bradley
358 S.W.2d 38 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jun 11, 1962
Local No. 8-6, Oil, Chemical and Atomic Workers International Union, AFL-CIO v. Missouri, 361 U.S. 363 , 80 S.Ct. 391 , 4 L.Ed.2d 373 ; see also State ex rel. State Board of Mediation v. … Pigg, 362 Mo. 798 , 244 S.W.2d 75 ; Atchison v. Retirement Board of Police Retirement System of Kansas City, Mo.Sup., 343 S.W. 2d 25, 35 .
Cited 4 timesPublishedBarb v. Farmers Insurance Exchange
281 S.W.2d 297 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jul 11, 1955
In McCloskey v. … This work necessitated extending her arm and reaching high above her head in marking the top of the board, and at times she was obliged to get down on her knees in reaching and marking the lower part of the board.
Cited 63 timesPublishedBarber v. Hartford Life Insurance
279 Mo. 316 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jul 9, 1919
[Waters-Pierce Oil Co. v. Texas (No. 1), 212 U. S. 86, 97, 112 ; Same v. Same (No. 2), 212 U. S. 112, 118 ; Sauer v. City of New York, 206 U. S. 536, 546 ; Eustis v. Bolles, 150 U. S. 361 ; Murdock v. … PER CURIAM: The foregoing opinion of Brown, C., is adopted as the opinion of the court; Blair, P. J., and Bond- and Graves, JJ., concur.
Cited 7 timesPublishedValley Spring Hog Ranch Co. v. Plagmann
282 Mo. 1 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Apr 1, 1920
Thus in State v. … In State v.
Cited 31 timesPublished81 Mo. 236 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Oct 15, 1883
Reed v. Price, 30 Mo. 442 , and authorities there cited. In the case at bar, both parties are in possession. … In Brown v. Carter, 52 Mo. 46 , it is said “ this action can be maintained only where the plaintiff is in the possession of the close at the time of the commission of the trespass.”
Cited 7 timesPublishedSwigert v. Hannibal & St. Joseph Railroad
75 Mo. 475 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Apr 15, 1882
This is an action to recover damages for personal injuries received by the plaintiff in attempting to board one of the defendant’s passenger trains. … Nelson v. R. R. Co., 68 Mo. 593 .
Cited 18 timesPublishedState ex inf. Danforth v. State Environmental Improvement Authority
518 S.W.2d 68 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jan 13, 1975
As said in Board of Public Buildings v. … No case is cited to support this argument, but we do mention two which call for rejection of the same: State v. Board of Regents, 305 Mo. 57 , 264 S.W. 698 (Mo. banc 1924) and Board of Public Buildings v.
Cited 37 timesPublished
Ask Donna