Case law

Shacklett v. Cummins

270 Mo. 496 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Mar 30, 1917

Cherbonnier, 108 Mo. l. c. 263-4; Hays v. Kansas City, Ft. S. & G. Ry. Co., 108 Mo. 549 -550; Warren v. Castello, 109 Mo. l. c. 342; Rosenwald v. Middlebrook, 188 Mo. l. c. 93; Swearengin v. Stafford, 188 S. W. … The judgment of the circuit court is accordingly reversed. - Brown, C., concurs. PER CURIAM: — The foregoing opinion of Railey, C.., is hereby adopted as the opinion of the court. All of the judges concur.

Jacobs v. Moseley

91 Mo. 457 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Oct 15, 1886

Tamm v. Kellogg, 49 Mo. 118 ; Thomas v. Babb, 45 Mo. 384 . … Taylor v. Zepp, 14 Mo. 482 ; Blair v. Smith, 16 Mo. 273 ; Turner v. Baker, 64 Mo. 218 ; Acton v. Dooley, 74 Mo. 63 ; Browne on Frauds, sec. 75.

Ross v. Grand Pants Co.

241 Mo. 296 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Mar 21, 1912

C.] l. c. 141; Wells v. Smith, 49 W. Va. l. c. 84; State v. Council, 129 N. C. l. c. 516, 517; Railway v. Butler, 52 Tex. Civ. l. c. 325; Burns v. Matthews, 46 S. W. 79 ; Clements v. … [Lohmeyer v. Cordage Co., 214 Mo. l. c. 690; Hartzler v. Railroad, 218 Mo. l. c. 564, 565; Brown v. Railroad, 175 Mo. l. c. 188; St. Joseph v. Life Ins. Co., 183 Mo. l. c. 7; State v. Earll, 225 Mo. 537 .]

Landau v. Travelers Insurance Co.

305 Mo. 563 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Dec 18, 1924

[Landau v. Pacific Mut. Ins. Co., supra.] … [Roach v. Great Northern Ry. Co., supra; State v. Ah Loi, 5 Nev. 101 ; Vicksburg Ry. Co. v. O’Brien, 119 U. S. 99 .]

State ex rel. Quick v. Pearson

273 Mo. 72 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Dec 22, 1917

BROWN, C. … PER CURTAM: — The foregoing opinion of Brown, 0., is adopted as the opinion of the court. All of the judges concur.

Gem Stores, Inc. v. O'BRIEN

374 S.W.2d 109 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Dec 9, 1963

Brown, 366 U.S. 599 , 81 S.Ct. 1144 , 6 L.Ed.2d 563 ; and Gallagher v. Crown Kosher Super Market of Massachusetts, Inc., 366 U.S. 617 , 81 S.Ct. 1122 , 6 L.Ed.2d 536 . … Oregon State Board of Dental Examiners, 294 U.S. 608 , 55 S.Ct. 570 , 79 L.Ed. 1086 . The legislature may select one phase of one field and apply a *116 remedy there, neglecting the others. A. F. of L. v.

State v. Powers

255 Mo. 263 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Feb 17, 1914

BROWN, J. Convicted of receiving stolen money and his punishment fixed at two years in the penitentiary, defendant appeals to this court. … The evidence in the case of State v.

State Ex Rel. Cox v. Trimble

312 Mo. 322 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jan 6, 1926

The north and south sides of the elevator shaft were boarded up solid to the top of the building. … [Wheeler v. Hotel Stevens Co., 71 Wn. 142 ; Bremer v. Pleiss, 121 Wis. 61 ; Patterson v. Hemenway, 148 Mass. 95 ; Kappes v. Brown Shoe Co., 116 Mo. App. 154 .] "In Main v.

O'Connor v. Missouri Pacific Railway Co.

94 Mo. 150 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Oct 15, 1887

Thompson v. Railroad, 51 Mo. 190 ; Lloyd v. Railroad, 53 Mo. 509 ; Petty v. Railroad, 88 Mo. 306 ; and many other cases. 2. … Kay v. Railroad, 65 Pa. St. 269; Butler v. Railroad, 28 Wis. 487 . In Brown v. Railroad, 32 N.

Korneman v. Davis

281 Mo. 234 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Mar 2, 1920

To the same effect is Cole v. Mueller, 187 Mo. l.c. 647, where Fox, J., said that the estimate of the area as a certain number of acres "more or less" is "part of the description." BROWN, C., in Whitwell v. … Brown and Ragland, CC., concur.

State ex rel. McCampbell v. County Court

90 Mo. 593 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Oct 15, 1886

United States v. Anthony, 11 Blatchf. 200 : Minor v. Happersett, 21 Wall. 162 ; United States v. Reese, 92 U. S. 214 ; 1 McArthur, 169 ; 1 Abb. Dict. 223 ; Van Volkenburgh v. Brown, 43 Cal. 43 . … Fitzpatrick v. Meyers, 80 Mo. 601 , returns a negative answer to-the third and last question stated in the foregoing part of this opinion. The peremptory writ will be and is hereby denied. All concur.

State ex rel. Kansas City Power & Light Co. v. Public Service Commission

310 Mo. 313 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Aug 25, 1925

S. 1919, sec. 10522; Railway v. Pub. Serv. Comm., 266 Mo. l. c. 340; Lusk v. Atkinson, 269 Mo. l. c. 118; State ex rel v. Pub. Serv. Comm., 271 Mo. 155 ; State ex rel. v. Pub. Serv. … S. 1919; State ex inf. v. Gas. Co., 254 Mo. l. c. 534; State ex rel. v. Commission, 275 Mo. l. c. 206; Railway v. Commission, 281 Mo. 52 ; State ex rel. Ry. v. Commission, 277 Mo. 175 ; State ex rel. v.

Marczuk v. St. Louis Public Service Co.

355 Mo. 536 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Oct 14, 1946

Kiel; McGowan v. Wells; Hoodenpyle v. Wells; Maher v. St. Louis Pub. Serv. Co.; Stout v. Kansas City Pub. Serv. Co., Schimmelpfenning v. Wells (Mo. App.), 24 S.W.2d 154 and Wilson v. … Wells, supra) at a point where it is permissible to passengers to alight from or to board a car" and not alone to one who has been or is in the *Page 548 act of becoming a pasenger.

Lauck v. Reis

310 Mo. 184 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jul 30, 1925

[Wells v. Mo. Pac. Ry. Co., 110 Mo. l.c. 294.] … [Bertram v. Railway Co., 154 Mo. 639 ; Jackson v. Railroad, 157 Mo. 621 .] We rule this assignment against appellant. IV.

American Bridge Co. v. Smith

352 Mo. 616 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Feb 7, 1944

Santa Cruz Fruit Packing Co. v. National Labor Relations Board, 303 U.S. 453 , 58 S.Ct. 656 ; Bacon v. Illinois, 227 U.S. 504 , 33 S.Ct. 299 ; Woodruff v. Parham, 8 Wall. 123 . … McGoldrick v.

State v. Maurer

255 Mo. 152 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Feb 17, 1914

[Ferguson v. Gentry, 206 Mo. 189, 195 ; State v. Doerring, 194 Mo. 398, 414 ; Logan v. Fidelity Co., 146 Mo. 114, 122 ; Huff v. Alsup, 64 Mo. 51 .] … Brown and Baris, JJ., concur.

State v. Frey

459 S.W.2d 359 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Nov 9, 1970

In State v. … State v. Townley, 147 Mo. 205 , 48 S.W. 833 .” In Meyer v.

State v. Ashe

350 S.W.2d 768 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Nov 13, 1961

The evidence introduced by the State supports the following statement of facts: In the early morning hours of January 10, 1960, the defendant Ashe, in company with Eric Larson, Thomas Brown, and John Edward Johnson, entered … Among the cases examined are State v. Williams, Mo., 263 S.W. 195 ; State v. Varner, Mo., 329 S.W.2d 623 ; State v.

State v. Wilkinson

606 S.W.2d 632 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Oct 15, 1980

Recently this Court in State v. Brown, 549 S.W.2d 336 (Mo. banc 1977) and State v. … State v. Brown, 549 S.W.2d 336 at 343 .

State v. Heitman

589 S.W.2d 249 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Nov 14, 1979

Chimel v. California, 395 U.S. 752 , 89 S.Ct. 2034 , 23 L.Ed.2d 685 (1969); Carroll v. United States, 267 U.S. 132, 158 , 45 S.Ct. 280 , 69 L.Ed. 543 (1925); Agnello v. … Beck v. Ohio, 379 U.S. 89, 91 , 85 S.Ct. 223 , 13 L.Ed.2d 142 (1964); State v. Robinson, 484 S.W.2d 186, 189 (Mo.1972).