Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersmo

10,000+ results

4.93s

  • Drake v. Kansas City

    190 Mo. 370 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Oct 11, 1905

    In Buckley v. … Barr v.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • State ex rel. State Highway Commission v. Mann

    624 S.W.2d 4 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Oct 13, 1981

    The Jackson County Zoning Board notified the State Highway Commission of the special use permit request. … State Highway Comm’n v. Southern Dev. Co., 509 S.W.2d 18, 27 (Mo.1974); Shelby County R-IV School Dist. v. Herman, 392 S.W.2d 609, 614 (Mo.1965); Board of Pub. Bldgs. v. GMT Corp., 580 S.W.2d 519, 525 (Mo.App.1979).

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • State v. Neibekier

    184 Mo. 211 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Nov 22, 1904

    .- One Peter Winosky and his wife kept a boarding-house in the village. … [McDonald v. State, 80 Wis. 407 ; People v. McLeod, 1 Hill (N. Y.) 377; Ibid v. Ibid, 25 Wend. 483 ; Campbell v. Hall, Cowp. 208; Vattel, bk. 2, ch. 8, secs. 101, 102; Story on Conflict of Laws, 518.]

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Ex Parte Dixon

    330 Mo. 652 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jun 8, 1932

    [State v. Linton, 283 Mo. 1 , 22 S. W. 847 .] … J. p. 285; Gue v. City of Eugene, 53 Ore. 282 ; State v. Houghton, 45 Ore. 110 ; and People v. Cignarale, 110 N.

    Cited 13 timesPublished
  • Burnet v. Burnet

    244 Mo. 491 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jun 29, 1912

    [Read v. Watkins, 11 Lea (Tenn.),. l. c. 161; Brown v. Hunt, 12 Heisk. (Tenn.) 409; Bean v. Kenmuir, 86 Mo. l. c. 670, 671, affirmed Walton v. Drumtra, 152 Mo. l. c. 501.] II. … Brown, C., does not concur. PER CURIAM. The foregoing opinion of Bond, 0., is adopted as the opinion of the court. All the judges concur.

    Cited 36 timesPublished
  • Meier v. City of St. Louis

    180 Mo. 391 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Mar 9, 1904

    . — This is a suit in equity to cancel two special taxbills made out, certified and registered by the president of the Board of Public Improvements and the Comptroller of the city St. … [Garrett v. St. Louis, 25 Mo. 505 ; Heman v. Allen, 156 Mo. 534 ; Barber Asphalt Co. v. French, 158 Mo. 534 ; Ibid. v. Ibid., 181 U. S. 324 .]

    Cited 40 timesPublished
  • Carter v. Matthey Laundry & Dry Cleaning Co.

    330 S.W.2d 771 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Dec 14, 1959

    Corporations § 7, p. 385; May Department Stores Co. v. Union Electric Light & Power Co., 341 Mo. 299 , 107 S.W.2d 41, 55 [11]. … Moore v. Southwestern Bell Telephone Co., supra, 301 S.W.2d 823 . Plaintiff’s verdict on count 3 was for $14,000 against Matthey and National, Inc.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Bristol v. Thompson

    204 Mo. 366 · Supreme Court of Missouri · May 29, 1907

    In Stump v. … [Henderson v. Langley, 76 Mo. 226 .]” The Henderson case upon this point is likewise approved in the case of McClannahan v. Smith, 76 Mo. l. c. 431, and Jasper County v. Wadlow, 82 Mo. l. c. 179, 180. Again, in Brown v.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • State v. Sims

    395 S.W.2d 445 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Nov 8, 1965

    In State v. … State v. Smith, Mo.Sup., 240 S.W.2d 671, 675 ; State v. Morris, Mo.Sup., 248 S.W.2d 847, 849 ; State v. Brown, Mo.Sup., 312 S.W.2d 818, 822 ; State v. *450 Anderson, Mo.Sup., 375 S.W.2d 116, 121 .

    Cited 15 timesPublished
  • Fred Wolferman, Inc. v. Root

    356 Mo. 976 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Sep 8, 1947

    And see National Labor Relations Board v. Electric Vacuum Cleaner Co., Inc., 315 U. S. 685 . … E. (2d) 1; Wisconsin Employment Relations Board v. Milk & Ice Drivers, etc., 238 Wis. 379 , 299 N. W. 31 ; Markham & Callow, Inc., v.

    Cited 25 timesPublished
  • Fitzgerald v. Jones

    33 Mo. 587 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Mar 15, 1863

    Brown et al., 11 Mo. 138 , and Ashburn v. Ayres, 28 Mo. 75 . The statutes on which these cases turned were both acts creating Courts of Common Pleas, one the St. … Brown and Asburn v. Ayres. The Circuit Court erred in dismissing the action, and for this reason its judgment i's reversed and the cause remanded. The other judges concur.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Bender v. Kroger Grocery & Baking Co.

    310 Mo. 488 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Oct 6, 1925

    [Fogarty v. St. Louis Transfer Co., 180 Mo. 490 ; Bien v. St. Louis Transit Co., 108 Mo. App. 399 ; Edge v. *493 Railway Co., 206 Mo. 471 ; Hollweg v. Telephone Co., 195 Mo. 149 .] … [Koerner v. St. Louis Car Co., 209 Mo. 158 ; Zellars v. Mo. Water Co., 92 Mo. App. 123 -127.] ” In Koerner v. St.

    Cited 28 timesPublished
  • S. S. Kresge Co. v. Unemployment Compensation Commission

    349 Mo. 590 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Mar 13, 1942

    Wallingford v. Terminal Rd. Assn., 338 Mo. 1147 , 1159, 88 S.W.2d 361 , 366[6]. Consult: Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations Board, 305 U.S. 197 , 229, 59 Sup. … Ct. 206, 83 L.Ed. 126 ; National Labor Relations Board v. Columbia Enameling Stamping Co., 309 U.S. 292 , 299, 59 Sup. Ct. 501, 83 L.Ed. 660 . [2] The record discloses that Lyndell H.

    Cited 20 timesPublished
  • Wolverton v. Kurn

    348 Mo. 908 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Oct 30, 1941

    Plaintiff and their other children sat on a board across the wagon bed behind them. … [Tharp v. Thompson (Mo. App.), 139 S.W.2d 1116 ; Smith v. Thompson, 346 Mo. 502 , 142 S.W.2d 70 .] In the Tharp case, the train "struck only the rear end of the truck."

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • State Ex Rel. Igoe v. Joynt

    341 Mo. 788 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Sep 27, 1937

    Martin ’filed a petition in that court asking for a temporary restraining order and also that a hearing be had and thereafter a permanent injunction be issued against the members of the Board of Police Commissioners of the … These sections invest the president of the police board with the power to determine the character and use of such property as is seized by the police as gambling devices.

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • Beatty v. Metropolitan St. Louis Sewer District

    867 S.W.2d 217 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Dec 21, 1993

    Louis County to appoint a six-member board of trustees to operate MSD. The plan also gave that board authority to impose ad valorem taxes and establish charges for sewer services. … Beatty v. Metropolitan St. Louis Sewer District, 731 S.W.2d 318 (Mo.App.1987) (en banc).

    Cited 19 timesPublished
  • Middleman v. Complete Auto Transit, Inc.

    486 S.W.2d 456 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Nov 13, 1972

    Brown, Moser, Marsalek, Carpenter, Cleary, Jaeckel, Keaney & Brown, St. Louis, for appellant. STOCKARD, Commissioner. … V, Constitution of Missouri, V.A.M.S.

    Cited 11 timesPublished
  • State v. Draper

    65 Mo. 335 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Oct 15, 1877

    The ease of the State v. Jones, supra, was decided upon the authority of Dias v. … He told me his trouble with Draper originated about a trunk; that Draper and his wife had boarded with him; that some two or three weeks before, they went away, owing him for board, and he left the trunk; that he and Draper

    Cited 18 timesPublished
  • City of Bourbon v. Miller

    420 S.W.2d 296 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Nov 13, 1967

    The proceedings were instituted by a resolution adopted by plaintiff’s Board of Aldermen on January 7, 1964. … Womack v.

    Cited 23 timesPublished
  • Deardorff v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad

    263 Mo. 65 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Dec 31, 1914

    Commission v. Texas and Pacific Ry. Co., 229 U. S. l. c. 340; Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Ry. Co. v. Iowa, 233 U. S. l. c. 343; Baer Bros. v. Denver & Rio Grande Ry. Co., 233 U. S. l. c. 490; Southern Pac. … Terminal Co. v. Interstate Commerce Comm., 219 U. S. 498 ; Ohio Railroad Comm. v. Worthington, 225 U. S. l. c. 107; Texas Ry. Co. v. Sabine Tram. Co., 227 U. S. 119 .

    Cited 1 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.