Case law

Lucas Hunt Village Co. v. Klein

358 Mo. 1054 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Mar 14, 1949

The decision cited-and relied on by the Board of Trade ease is Lebow v. Hudson (Mo. … W. (2d) 54, 59 (10); Bauer v. White, 225 Mo. App. 270, 275-6 (3), 29 S. W. (2d) 176, 179 (2, 3); Board of Trade Office Bldg. v. Shannon Grain Co., 223 Mo. App. 1199, 1203 (3), 21 S. W. (2d) 913, 915 (3). 2 . 51 C.

State v. Mahurin

799 S.W.2d 840 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Nov 20, 1990

Brown, 660 S.W.2d 694, 697 (Mo. banc 1983); any doubt is to be resolved in favor of the law’s validity. State v. Young, 695 S.W.2d 882, 883 (Mo. banc 1985). … Brown, 660 S.W.2d at 697 . Because a defendant’s knowledge of the consequences of his or her actions must be proven, the possibility of arbitrary convictions is negated. See State v.

Lampert v. Haydel

96 Mo. 439 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Oct 15, 1888

J., dissented (basing his conclusion on the ground that the majority opinion was contrary to two decisions of this court in McDowell v. Brown, 21 Mo. 57 , and McIlvaine v. … The case of McDowell v. Brown, 21 Mo. 57, was one which involved the construction of a deed not a will. The granting clause was to “the grantee” and her heirs from henceforth and forever.

Rodgers v. Danforth

486 S.W.2d 258 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Oct 3, 1972

State v. De Groat, 259 Mo. 364 , 168 S.W. 702 . We hold, under authority of United States v. … Brown, (N.D.Ohio W.D.) 321 F.Supp. 741, 749-750 , ably illustrates the vagueness found in our statute: ". . .

Harris v. Westin Management Co. East

230 S.W.3d 1 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Aug 7, 2007

Standard of Review As noted in James v. … Wells v. Brown, 33 S.W.3d 190, 192 (Mo. banc 2000); McClain v. Welsh Co., 748 S.W.2d 720, 724-25 (Mo.App.1988).

Mugan v. Wheeler

241 Mo. 376 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Mar 21, 1912

[Green v. Cates, 73 Mo. 115 ; Rogers v. Ramey, 137 Mo. 598 ; Hall v. Small, 178 Mo. 629 ; Crawley v. Crafton, 193 Mo. 421 .] … J., and Brown. J. concur.

Kopp v. Traders Gate City National Bank

357 Mo. 659 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Mar 8, 1948

Chandler v. Hulen, supra; Brown v. Holman, 292 Mo. 641 , 238 S.W. 1065 ; Cowell v. Roberts' Executor, 79 Mo. 218 , and cases therein cited. [3] John J. O'Connell married respondent's aunt, Margaret Christopher, in 1909. … Blackwell v. De Arment's Estate, Mo. App., 300 S.W. 1035 ; Boldwin v. Lay, Mo. App., 226 S.W. 602 ; Hall v. Getman, 121 Mo.

Jerry-Russell Bliss, Inc. v. Hazardous Waste Management Commission

702 S.W.2d 77 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Dec 17, 1985

Brown Group, Inc. v. Administrative Hearing Comm’n, 649 S.W.2d 874, 881 (Mo. banc 1983). In its construction of section 260.-395.15, the Commission relied on Barbieri *81 v. … Eminence R-1 School Dist. v. Hodge, 635 S.W.2d 10, 13 (Mo.1982); Brown Group, Inc. v. Admin. Hearing Comm’n, 649 S.W.2d at 881-882 .

Case v. Espenschied

169 Mo. 215 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jun 18, 1902

[Richardson v. Lowry, 67 Mo. 411 ; Schuster v. Schuster, 93 Mo. 438 ; Gilliland v. Gilliland, 96 Mo. 522 ; Thomas v. Thomas, 107 Mo. *220 459 ; Ilgenfritz v. Ilgenfritz, 116 Mo. 429 ; Curd. v. … Brown, 148 Mo. 82 ; Bank v. Simpson, 152 Mo. 638 .] And the same is true where he causes a note or deed of trust to be executed in her favor, as in the case at bar.

American Bridge Co. v. Smith

352 Mo. 616 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Feb 7, 1944

Santa Cruz Fruit Packing Co. v. National Labor Relations Board, 303 U.S. 453 , 58 S.Ct. 656 ; Bacon v. Illinois, 227 U.S. 504 , 33 S.Ct. 299 ; Woodruff v. Parham, 8 Wall. 123 . … McGoldrick v.

City of St. Louis v. Lemp

93 Mo. 477 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Oct 15, 1887

Campbell v. Laclede Gas Light Co., 84 Mo. 372 ; Smith v. Public Schools, 30 Mo. 290 ; Le Beau v. Gaven, 37 Mo. 556 ; Benson v. Morrow, 61 Mo. 345 ; Board of Directors v. Risley, 40 Mo. 357 ; Buse v.

Howard v. Coshow

33 Mo. 118 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Oct 15, 1862

(Eastwood v. Kenyon, 11 Ad. & El. 445; Alger v. Scoville, 1 Gray, 391 ; Pike v. Brown, 7 Cush. 133 ; Leonard v. Vrendenburg, 8 John. 39 ; Skelton v. Brewster, 8 John. 376 ; Story on Contracts, § 861.) … (Merle v. Hascall, 10 Mo. 406 .)

State ex rel. Harris v. Herrmann

75 Mo. 340 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Apr 15, 1882

In State ex rel. v. Hammer, 42 N. J. … Devine v. Cook, 84 Ill. 590 . And in a still later case the same doctrine has been re-asserted. Klokke v. Dodge, 14 Chic. Leg. News 147. In Ohio also similar views are expressed. Thus in State ex rel. v.

Coit v. Bentz

348 S.W.2d 941 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jul 10, 1961

May v. Bradford, Mo., 348 S.W.2d 133 , calls it an “abstract submission” and cites Rosenfeld v. … Highfill v. Brown, Mo., 340 S.W.2d 656, 663 [9]; McCarthy v. Sebben, Mo., 331 S.W.2d 601, 606 . See also Kimmich v. Berry, Mo., 319 S.W.2d 546, 547-548 ; Vogelgesang v. Waelder, Mo.

Von De Veld v. Judy

143 Mo. 348 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Mar 15, 1898

Finter’s at the Mers Hotel, at Brown’s, Woolridge’s, and in Colorado. … Fitzgerald v. Barker, 96 Mo. 661 ; Macfarland v. Heim, 127 Mo. 327 ; Greer v. Bank, 128 Mo. 559 ; Vogg v. Railroad, 138 Mo. 172 ; Fox v. Windes, 127 Mo. 513 ; Brobst v. Brock, 10 Wall. 519 ; Osborne v.

State v. Thompson

363 S.W.2d 711 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jan 14, 1963

State v. Goodwin, Mo., 352 S.W.2d 614, 620 [5]; State v. Small, Mo., 344 S.W.2d 49, 51 [2]; State v. Lyle, 353 Mo. 386 , 182 S.W.2d 530, 533 [5] ; State v. Taylor, 347 Mo. 607 , 148 S.W.2d 802, 804-805 [4]; State v. … State v. Dyer, 139 Mo. 199, 212 , 40 S.W. 768 ; State v. Murray, 91 Mo. 95, 103 , 3 S.W. 397 ; State v. Gregory, 158 Mo. 139, 147-148 , 59 S.W. 89 ; State v. Prince, 258 Mo. 315, 328 , 167 S.W. 535 ; State v.

City of Sedalia ex rel. Gilsonite Construction Co. v. Montgomery

227 Mo. 1 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Mar 30, 1910

[Mulligan v. Smith, 59 Cal. 206 ; Rector v. Board, 50 Ark. 116 ; Batty v. City of Hastings, 63 Neb. 26 .] … [Reinhard v. Lead, etc., Co., 107 Mo. 616 .] The officers of the corporate landowners, unless specially authorized by the board of directors, were without power to bind the corporations by their signatures. [Morse v.

State v. King

334 S.W.2d 34 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Mar 14, 1960

He reached over the counter and dropped a note, a brown paper bag and a one-dollar bill on Mrs. White’s desk, which was on a lower level; Mrs. … State v. Murray, Mo., 280 S.W.2d 809 ; State v. Johnson, Mo., 234 S.W.2d 219, 222 ; State v. Poucher, Mo. App., 303 S.W.2d 197 . The situation here is somewhat analogous to that in State v.

Townsend v. Maplewood Investment & Loan Co.

351 Mo. 738 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jul 6, 1943

Co. v. Hilbert, 24 Mo. App. 338 ; Alexander v. Relfe, 74 Mo. 495 , l. c. 519; Wilson v. Torchon Lace & Mercantile Co., 149 S. W. 1156 , l. c. 1161 (3); PottsTurnbull Adv. Co. v. Gatchell, 257 S. … Maynard v. Doe Run Lead Co., 305 Mo. 356 , 265 S. W. 94 , l. c. 97 (2). See also 18 C. J. S. 645, sec. 212.

State Ex Rel. Waddell v. Johnson

316 Mo. 21 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jul 11, 1927

J. p. 214; 3 Cooley’s Taxation (4 Ed.) p. 2022; Franklin Avenue Bank v. Board of Education of the Town of Roscoe, 75 Mo. l. c. 411.] II. Appellants contend the de facto district could not legally assess and levy taxes. … It was said in the case of Moore v.