Case law

Peck's Products Company v. Bannister

362 S.W.2d 596 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Dec 11, 1962

Ulman v. Evans, (Mo.) 247 S.W.2d 693, 694 ; Drey v. State Tax Commission, (Mo.) 345 S.W.2d 228, 234 . … Louis Electric Bridge Co. v. Koeln, supra; Brinkerhoff-Faris Trust & Savings Co. v. Hill, supra; Bank of Carthage v. Thomas, 330 Mo. 19 , 48 S.W.2d 930 . For the reasons indicated the judgment is affirmed.

Bremen Saving Bank v. Branch-Crookes Saw Co.

104 Mo. 425 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Apr 15, 1891

Deere v. Marsden, 88 Mo. 512; Crawford v. Spencer, 92 Mo. 498 ; Fitzgerald v. Barker, 96 Mo. 661 ; Mech. Banking Ass'n v. N. Y., etc., W. L. Co., 35 N. Y. 505 ; National Park Bank v. G. A., etc., 116 N. … Y. 292 ; National Bank of Republic v. Young, 7 Atl. Rep. 488; Holmes v. Willard, 24 N. Y. 260 ; Second National Bank v. Mfg. Co., 18 N. Y. 954 ; Supervisors v. Schenck, 5 Wall. 784 ; La Fayette Savings Bank v.

Electrolytic Chlorine Co. v. Wallace & Tiernan Co.

328 Mo. 782 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Sep 5, 1931

[Brown Const. Co. v. MacArthur Bros. Co., 236 Mo. 41 , 48; Dierks Sons Lumber Co. v. Taylor, 296 S.W. 176 , 180.] … [State ex rel. v. Blakemore, 275 Mo. 695 ; Legg Shoe Co. v. Brown Leather Co., 249 S.W. 147 ; Connelly v. Illinois Central R. Co., 169 Mo. App. 272 ; In Matter of Fowler, 310 Mo. 339 .]

State v. Copeland

335 Mo. 140 · Supreme Court of Missouri · May 17, 1934

It was built of composition board or wood, and was about nine feet high at the rear and was open in front. … [State v. Nasello, 325 Mo. 442 , 30 S. W. (2d) 132 ; State v. Meyers, 99 Mo. 107 , 12 S. W 516; State v. Brown, 119 Mo. 527 , 24 S. W. 1027 , 25 S. W. 200 ; State v. Foster, 136 Mo. 653 , 38 S. W. 721 ; State v.

State Ex Rel. City of St. Louis v. O'Malley

343 Mo. 658 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Dec 20, 1938

Nor was any benefit district defined by the Board of Public Service or mentioned in the ordinance. … Louis v. Lang, 131 Mo. 412 , 33 S. W. 54 , City of St. Louis v. Wallrath et al., 293 Mo. 385 , 239 S. W. 110 , and City of Albany v. Gilbert, 144 Mo. 224 , 46 S. W. 157 . City of St. Louis v.

Breeding v. Dodson Trailer Repair, Inc.

679 S.W.2d 281 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Nov 20, 1984

Petersburg v. Switzer, 277 S.W.2d 689 (Mo.App.1955); A.M. Legg Shoe Co. v. Brown Leather Co., 249 S.W. 147 (Mo.App.1923); 23 Am.Jur.2d Depositions and Discovery § 189 (1983). Exceptions exist, however. … Legg Shoe Co. v. Brown Leather Co., 249 S.W. at 148; 23 Am.Jur.2d Depositions and Discovery, supra.

State Upon the Information of McKittrick v. Gate City Optical Co.

339 Mo. 427 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Oct 2, 1936

Winslow v. Board of Dental Examiners, 115 Kan. 450 , 223 Pac. 308 , was a proceeding to enjoin the enforcement of an order of said board revoking plaintiff’s license to practice dentistry. … Beck v.

State v. Johnson

118 Mo. 491 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Dec 7, 1893

Green, 1 Parker’s Criminal Reports, 11; State v. Simon, 50 Mo. 370 ; State v. McCanon, 51 Mo. 160 ; State v. Partlow, 90 Mo. 608 ; Brown v. State, 32 Miss. 433 ; Starkey v. … State v. Simon, and Wharton on Criminal Evidence, supra. V.

State v. Slaten

252 S.W.2d 330 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Oct 13, 1952

Slaten says that he did not drink any of this whisky but left it in the barbershop for Brown and Turk. … In State v.

State v. Dunn

80 Mo. 681 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Oct 15, 1883

State v. Jeffors, 64 Mo. 376 , and authorities there cited. State v. … Brown, 64 Mo. 367 ; State v. Christian, 66 Mo. 138 ; State v. Brown, 63 Mo. 439 ; State v. Underwood, 57 Mo. 40 . The 13th instruction asked for defendant, had reference' to the credibility of a witness.

Chrisman v. Linderman

202 Mo. 605 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Mar 28, 1907

To the same effect is McFadin v. Board, 188 Mo. 688 , and Quail v. Lomas, 200 Mo. 674 See, also, Casteel v. Potter, 176 Mo. 76 . … See Dumey v.

State v. Rose

92 Mo. 201 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Apr 15, 1887

The action of the court in this respect is fully justified by the following cases: State v. Underwood, 57 Mo. 50; State v. Starr, 38 Mo. 270 ; State v. Linney, 52 Mo. 40 ; State v. Shoultz, 25 Mo. 153 ; State v. … Christian, 66 Mo. 138, 145 ; State v. Hudson, 59 Mo. 135, 138 ; State v. Vansant, 80 Mo. 69 , 70; State v. Jones, 78 Mo. 278 ; State v. Thomas, 78 Mo. 327 ; State v. Brown, 64 Mo. 368 ; State v. Peak, 85 Mo. 190 .

Kirby v. Heaton

315 Mo. 338 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jul 30, 1926

We quote from a certified copy of the opinion in the case of Taylor v. … [Koerner v. Leathe, 149 Mo. 361 , 51 S. W. 96 .] In Mitchel v. Curran, 1 Mo.

Lampert v. Haydel

96 Mo. 439 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Oct 15, 1888

J., dissented (basing his conclusion on the ground that the majority opinion was contrary to two decisions of this court in McDowell v. Brown, 21 Mo. 57 , and McIlvaine v. … The case of McDowell v. Brown, 21 Mo. 57, was one which involved the construction of a deed not a will. The granting clause was to “the grantee” and her heirs from henceforth and forever.

Rodgers v. Danforth

486 S.W.2d 258 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Oct 3, 1972

State v. De Groat, 259 Mo. 364 , 168 S.W. 702 . We hold, under authority of United States v. … Brown, (N.D.Ohio W.D.) 321 F.Supp. 741, 749-750 , ably illustrates the vagueness found in our statute: ". . .

Harris v. Westin Management Co. East

230 S.W.3d 1 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Aug 7, 2007

Standard of Review As noted in James v. … Wells v. Brown, 33 S.W.3d 190, 192 (Mo. banc 2000); McClain v. Welsh Co., 748 S.W.2d 720, 724-25 (Mo.App.1988).

Wann v. Scullin

210 Mo. 429 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Mar 17, 1908

In San Diego v. Railroad, 44 Cal. 106 , it appeared that the corporate authority of the city was vested in a board of three trustees, McCoy, Sherman and Estudillo. … In Kitchen v.

State v. Oates

12 S.W.3d 307 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Feb 22, 2000

Hopkins ran into the service station with Oates pursuing him and shooting at him. *310 Brown noticed a police cruiser driving by and flagged it down. … Morgan v.

Jerry-Russell Bliss, Inc. v. Hazardous Waste Management Commission

702 S.W.2d 77 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Dec 17, 1985

Brown Group, Inc. v. Administrative Hearing Comm’n, 649 S.W.2d 874, 881 (Mo. banc 1983). In its construction of section 260.-395.15, the Commission relied on Barbieri *81 v. … Eminence R-1 School Dist. v. Hodge, 635 S.W.2d 10, 13 (Mo.1982); Brown Group, Inc. v. Admin. Hearing Comm’n, 649 S.W.2d at 881-882 .

Case v. Espenschied

169 Mo. 215 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jun 18, 1902

[Richardson v. Lowry, 67 Mo. 411 ; Schuster v. Schuster, 93 Mo. 438 ; Gilliland v. Gilliland, 96 Mo. 522 ; Thomas v. Thomas, 107 Mo. *220 459 ; Ilgenfritz v. Ilgenfritz, 116 Mo. 429 ; Curd. v. … Brown, 148 Mo. 82 ; Bank v. Simpson, 152 Mo. 638 .] And the same is true where he causes a note or deed of trust to be executed in her favor, as in the case at bar.