Case law

Kuehn v. Hahn

380 S.W.2d 445 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jul 13, 1964

Dever, Mo., 303 S.W.2d 1, 7 [13]. where it was said, quoting Brown v. Callicotte, Mo., 73 S.W.2d 190 , 193, and Shaw v. … Golian v. Stanley, Mo., 334 S.W.2d 88, 91 [1-3]. Skadal v. Brown, Mo., 351 S.W.2d 684, 690 [16-18]; Walton v. United States Steel Corporation, Mo., 362 S.W.2d 617, 626 .

State v. McAdoo

80 Mo. 216 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Oct 15, 1883

State v. Reiley, 75 Mo. 521 ; State v. McMurtry * decided last term. … State v. Brown, 8 Mo. 210 ; State v. McBride, 64 Mo. 364 ; State v. McMurtry, supra. But the indictment is good in defining the offense of drinking the liquor on the premises. III.

Lucas Hunt Village Co. v. Klein

358 Mo. 1054 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Mar 14, 1949

The decision cited-and relied on by the Board of Trade ease is Lebow v. Hudson (Mo. … W. (2d) 54, 59 (10); Bauer v. White, 225 Mo. App. 270, 275-6 (3), 29 S. W. (2d) 176, 179 (2, 3); Board of Trade Office Bldg. v. Shannon Grain Co., 223 Mo. App. 1199, 1203 (3), 21 S. W. (2d) 913, 915 (3). 2 . 51 C.

Buschling v. Ackley

270 Mo. 157 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Feb 24, 1917

[Mound City Land & Stock Co. v. Miller, 170 Mo. 240 , l. c. 256; Little River Drainage District v. Railroad, 236 Mo. l. c. 107; Ross v. Board of Supervisors, 1 L. R. A. (N. S.) l. c. 437; Spencer v. Merchant, 125 U. … S. 561 ; State ex *165 rel. v. Board of County Commrs., 87 Minn. l. c. 336; Irrigation District v. Williams, 76 Cal. l. c. 367.]

Landau v. Travelers Insurance Co.

305 Mo. 563 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Dec 18, 1924

[Landau v. Pacific Mut. Ins. Co., supra.] … [Roach v. Great Northern Ry. Co., supra; State v. Ah Loi, 5 Nev. 101 ; Vicksburg Ry. Co. v. O’Brien, 119 U. S. 99 .]

Boothe v. Stephen M.

253 Mo. 119 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Dec 6, 1913

[Collier v. Gault, 234 Mo. l. c. 465; Coberly v. Coberly, 189 Mo. l. c. 16, 17; Chapman v. Kullman, 191 Mo. l. c. 247; Rozier v. Griffith, 31 Mo. l. c. 174; Shepperd v. Fisher, 206 Mo. l. c. 249.] II. … Hollander, 73 Mo. 105 ; Hughes v. Burriss, 85 Mo. 660 ; Hines v. Hines, 243 Mo. l. c. 496; Robertson v. Brown, 187 Mo. l. c. 458 et seq.), and the principle is in full harmony with many other decisions and authorities.

State Ex Rel. Union Biscuit Co. v. Becker

316 Mo. 865 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Mar 2, 1927

Co. v. Reynolds, 257 Mo. l. c. 36, Judge Brown, speaking for a majority of this court, said: “We are of opinion that we should not examine the evidence, but rely upon the facts as found and recited by respondents. . . . … J., in which all concur except Brown, J., and Bond, J., who dissent, the latter on question of our jurisdiction only,- Blair, J., not sitting.

Housing Authority of Poplar Bluff v. Eastwood

736 S.W.2d 46 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Sep 15, 1987

Estate of Brown, 518 S.W.2d 729, 732 (Mo.App.1974). … Council Apartments v. Leachman, 603 S.W.2d 930, 931 (Mo.1980). Other states have reached the same conclusion. See. e.g., Sprik v. Regents of University of Michigan, 43 Mich.App. 178 , 204 N.W.2d 62 (1972); Clark v.

Riden v. City of Rolla

348 S.W.2d 946 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Sep 11, 1961

Williams v. … Randolph v. City of Springfield, 302 Mo. 33 , 257 S.W. 449, 453 , 31 A.L.R. 612 .

City of Sedalia ex rel. Gilsonite Construction Co. v. Montgomery

227 Mo. 1 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Mar 30, 1910

[Mulligan v. Smith, 59 Cal. 206 ; Rector v. Board, 50 Ark. 116 ; Batty v. City of Hastings, 63 Neb. 26 .] … [Reinhard v. Lead, etc., Co., 107 Mo. 616 .] The officers of the corporate landowners, unless specially authorized by the board of directors, were without power to bind the corporations by their signatures. [Morse v.

Lawrence v. Cameron Savings and Loan Association

395 S.W.2d 452 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Nov 8, 1965

It is an affirmative and special defense which must be specially pleaded in order to be available, Von Schleinitz v. North Hotel Co., 323 Mo. 1110 , 23 S.W.2d 64, 80 ; Chouteau v. … In this situation Johnson’s knowledge of the transactions had and agreements reached with the Lawrences and the Bensons, while sitting as a member of the board of directors, is to be imputed to the board of directors.

Cable v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad

361 Mo. 766 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Feb 12, 1951

See Brown v. Kurn (Mo. Sup.), 161 S. W. (2d) 421 , 422, The fireman saw the truck when “it was about- where the road curves before it makes a curve to come up on the track.” … W. (2d) 915, 919 ; Brown v. Kurn, supra; Scott v. Terminal R. Ass’n. of St. Louis (Mo. App.), 86 S. W. (2d) 116 , 118.

State v. Hutchison

957 S.W.2d 757 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Nov 25, 1997

. ___, 118 S.Ct. 416 , 139 L.Ed.2d 318 ; State v. Brown, 902 S.W.2d 278 (Mo. banc 1995), cert. denied, ___ U.S. ___, 116 S.Ct. 679 , 133 L.Ed.2d 527 (1995). III. … . ___, 118 S.Ct. 416 , 139 L.Ed.2d 318 (1997); State v. Brown, 902 S.W.2d 278 (Mo. banc 1995), cert. denied, ___ U.S. ___, 116 S.Ct. 679 , 133 L.Ed.2d 527 (1995). Point denied. VIII.

Searcy v. Noll Welty Lumber Co.

295 Mo. 188 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jul 27, 1922

[Stephens v. Macon, 83 Mo. 345 .] … [Saxon v. Transfer Co., 145 Mo. App. 693 .] The judgment of the trial court is affirmed. Small, C., concurs; Brown, C., absent.

State ex rel. Kansas City Power & Light Co. v. Public Service Commission

310 Mo. 313 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Aug 25, 1925

S. 1919, sec. 10522; Railway v. Pub. Serv. Comm., 266 Mo. l. c. 340; Lusk v. Atkinson, 269 Mo. l. c. 118; State ex rel v. Pub. Serv. Comm., 271 Mo. 155 ; State ex rel. v. Pub. Serv. … S. 1919; State ex inf. v. Gas. Co., 254 Mo. l. c. 534; State ex rel. v. Commission, 275 Mo. l. c. 206; Railway v. Commission, 281 Mo. 52 ; State ex rel. Ry. v. Commission, 277 Mo. 175 ; State ex rel. v.

State ex rel. Trammel v. Hannibal & St. Joseph Railroad

101 Mo. 136 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Apr 15, 1890

State v. Railroad, 60 Mo. 143 . … Railroad v. Shacklett, 30 Mo. 550 ; State v. Railroad, 37 Mo. 266 ; Livingston County v. Railroad, 60 Mo. 516 .

Wilkinson v. McGee

265 Mo. 574 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jul 6, 1915

[Sharpe v. Johnston, 59 Mo. 557 ; Warren v. Flood, 72 Mo. App. 199 .] ” Furthermore, we may safely premise that the rule in this State (Sharpe v. Johnston, 76 Mo. 660 ; Vansickle v. Brown, 68 Mo. l. c. 636; Brant v. … [Garrard v. Willet, 27 Ky. 4 ; Casey v. Dorr, 94 Ark. 433 ; Lindsey v. Couch, 22 Okla. 4 ; Barber v. Scott, 92 Iowa, 52 ; Brown v. Griffin, Cheves (S. C.), 32; Ricord v. Railroad, 15 Nev. 167 ; 26 Cyc. 40.]

State v. Milliorn

794 S.W.2d 181 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jul 31, 1990

This search uncovered an unmarked, brown bottle containing various controlled medications. … See Texas v.

State ex rel. Morgan v. Hemenway

272 Mo. 187 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Nov 17, 1917

Barbourville, 105 Ky. 174 ; Walker v. Richmond, 173 Ky. 26 ; East Saginaw Mfg. Co. v. East Saginaw, 19 Mich. 259 ; Attorney-General v. Springwells Tp. Board, 143 Mich. 523 ; State ex rel. v. … Turney, 235 Mo. l. c. 92-3, Commissioner Brown of this court, in clear and forceful language, said: “A retrospective law is one which creates a new obligation, imposes a new duty, or attaches a new disability with respect

Hawkins v. Paeben

332 Mo. 479 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Mar 16, 1933

At this time the board of directors of the company adopted a resolution giving Hunsehe, the president of the company, “full authority to settle up the matter as best he *482 knew how.” … [Morrow v. Mo. Gas & Elec. Service Co., 315 Mo. 367 , l. c. 380, 286 S. W. 106 ; Applegate v. Railroad, 252 Mo. 173 , l. c. 182, 158 S. W. 376 ; Finley v. Williams, 325 Mo. 688 , l. c. 694, 29 S. W. (2d) 103 .]