Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
3.80s
706 S.W.2d 25 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Feb 19, 1986
Moore v. Brown, 350 Mo. 256 , 165 S.W.2d 657, 663 (banc 1942). … See Scott v. Dunaway, 228 Ark. 943 , 311 S.W.2d 305 (1958); Ginsberg v. Centennial Turf Club, 126 Colo. 471 , 251 P.2d 926 (1952); Oneida County Fair Board v. Smylie, 86 Idaho 341 , 386 P.2d 374 (1963); Rohan v.
Cited 8 timesPublished486 S.W.2d 217 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Nov 13, 1972
See State v. Selle, supra. Appellant cites State v. Osborne, Mo, 246 S.W. 878 ; State v. Williams, 324 Mo. 179 , 22 S.W.2d 649 ; State v. Fleming, Mo, 177 S.W. 299 ; and State v. Brown, Mo., 217 S.W.2d 546 . … State v. Walters, Mo., 457 S.W.2d 817 ; Kirby v. Illinois, 406 U.S. 682 , 92 S.Ct. 1877 , 32 L.Ed.2d 411 . The judgment is affirmed. HOUSER, C., concurs.
Cited 54 timesPublishedHousing Authority of Poplar Bluff v. Eastwood
736 S.W.2d 46 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Sep 15, 1987
Estate of Brown, 518 S.W.2d 729, 732 (Mo.App.1974). … Council Apartments v. Leachman, 603 S.W.2d 930, 931 (Mo.1980). Other states have reached the same conclusion. See. e.g., Sprik v. Regents of University of Michigan, 43 Mich.App. 178 , 204 N.W.2d 62 (1972); Clark v.
Cited 2 timesPublishedBaldwin v. City of Springfield
141 Mo. 205 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Nov 3, 1897
There was formerly a board walk where the cinder walk now is. … Rex v. Leake (1833) 5 B. & Ad. 469; Kennedy v. Le Van (1877) 23 Minn. 513 ; Green v. Elliott (1882) 86 Ind. 53 ; Hartford v. R. R. (1890) 59 Conn. 250 ( 22 Atl. Rep. 37 ); Meiners v. St.
Cited 16 timesPublishedState Ex Rel. Catholic Charities of St. Louis v. Hoester
494 S.W.2d 70 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Apr 11, 1973
Dubinsky v. … Grimstead v.
Cited 17 timesPublished264 Mo. 505 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Mar 30, 1915
[Stutz v. Cameron, 254 Mo. 340 , l. c. 358-9; Bennett v. Hall, 184 Mo. 407 , l. c. 415-421.] Special Benefits. II. … Bridge Co. v.
Cited 4 timesPublished184 Mo. 377 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Nov 23, 1904
These statutes are fully construed and explained in Harness v. Cravens, 126 Mo. 233 ; Tooker v. Leake, 146 Mo. 419 ; Winningham v. Trueblood, 149 Mo. 572 ; Cummings v. Brown, 181 Mo. 711 .
Cited 9 timesPublished40 Mo. 591 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Mar 15, 1867
The facts in this case bear a very intimate relation to those in the case of Potter v. Stevens, decided at the present term. Stevens was summoned as a garnishee in the attachment suit of Potter et al. v. … Louis when-a boy, had no property and never accumulated any; his' expenses for tuition, clothing and board were borne exclusively by his brother from 1847 to 1856.
Cited 3 timesPublished380 S.W.2d 445 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jul 13, 1964
Dever, Mo., 303 S.W.2d 1, 7 [13]. where it was said, quoting Brown v. Callicotte, Mo., 73 S.W.2d 190 , 193, and Shaw v. … Golian v. Stanley, Mo., 334 S.W.2d 88, 91 [1-3]. Skadal v. Brown, Mo., 351 S.W.2d 684, 690 [16-18]; Walton v. United States Steel Corporation, Mo., 362 S.W.2d 617, 626 .
Cited 10 timesPublishedLucas Hunt Village Co. v. Klein
358 Mo. 1054 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Mar 14, 1949
The decision cited-and relied on by the Board of Trade ease is Lebow v. Hudson (Mo. … W. (2d) 54, 59 (10); Bauer v. White, 225 Mo. App. 270, 275-6 (3), 29 S. W. (2d) 176, 179 (2, 3); Board of Trade Office Bldg. v. Shannon Grain Co., 223 Mo. App. 1199, 1203 (3), 21 S. W. (2d) 913, 915 (3). 2 . 51 C.
Cited 32 timesPublished270 Mo. 157 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Feb 24, 1917
[Mound City Land & Stock Co. v. Miller, 170 Mo. 240 , l. c. 256; Little River Drainage District v. Railroad, 236 Mo. l. c. 107; Ross v. Board of Supervisors, 1 L. R. A. (N. S.) l. c. 437; Spencer v. Merchant, 125 U. … S. 561 ; State ex *165 rel. v. Board of County Commrs., 87 Minn. l. c. 336; Irrigation District v. Williams, 76 Cal. l. c. 367.]
Cited 27 timesPublished253 Mo. 119 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Dec 6, 1913
[Collier v. Gault, 234 Mo. l. c. 465; Coberly v. Coberly, 189 Mo. l. c. 16, 17; Chapman v. Kullman, 191 Mo. l. c. 247; Rozier v. Griffith, 31 Mo. l. c. 174; Shepperd v. Fisher, 206 Mo. l. c. 249.] II. … Hollander, 73 Mo. 105 ; Hughes v. Burriss, 85 Mo. 660 ; Hines v. Hines, 243 Mo. l. c. 496; Robertson v. Brown, 187 Mo. l. c. 458 et seq.), and the principle is in full harmony with many other decisions and authorities.
Cited 4 timesPublishedState Ex Rel. Union Biscuit Co. v. Becker
316 Mo. 865 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Mar 2, 1927
Co. v. Reynolds, 257 Mo. l. c. 36, Judge Brown, speaking for a majority of this court, said: “We are of opinion that we should not examine the evidence, but rely upon the facts as found and recited by respondents. . . . … J., in which all concur except Brown, J., and Bond, J., who dissent, the latter on question of our jurisdiction only,- Blair, J., not sitting.
Cited 11 timesPublishedLawrence v. Cameron Savings and Loan Association
395 S.W.2d 452 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Nov 8, 1965
It is an affirmative and special defense which must be specially pleaded in order to be available, Von Schleinitz v. North Hotel Co., 323 Mo. 1110 , 23 S.W.2d 64, 80 ; Chouteau v. … In this situation Johnson’s knowledge of the transactions had and agreements reached with the Lawrences and the Bensons, while sitting as a member of the board of directors, is to be imputed to the board of directors.
Cited 5 timesPublishedCity of Sedalia ex rel. Gilsonite Construction Co. v. Montgomery
227 Mo. 1 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Mar 30, 1910
[Mulligan v. Smith, 59 Cal. 206 ; Rector v. Board, 50 Ark. 116 ; Batty v. City of Hastings, 63 Neb. 26 .] … [Reinhard v. Lead, etc., Co., 107 Mo. 616 .] The officers of the corporate landowners, unless specially authorized by the board of directors, were without power to bind the corporations by their signatures. [Morse v.
Cited 21 timesPublishedCable v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad
361 Mo. 766 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Feb 12, 1951
See Brown v. Kurn (Mo. Sup.), 161 S. W. (2d) 421 , 422, The fireman saw the truck when “it was about- where the road curves before it makes a curve to come up on the track.” … W. (2d) 915, 919 ; Brown v. Kurn, supra; Scott v. Terminal R. Ass’n. of St. Louis (Mo. App.), 86 S. W. (2d) 116 , 118.
Cited 11 timesPublished362 S.W.2d 532 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Dec 11, 1962
Polizzi v. Nedrow, Mo., 247 S.W.2d 809, 811 ; Glore v. Bone, Mo., 324 S.W.2d 633, 635 [3]; Pinkston v. McClanahan, Mo., 350 S.W.2d 724, 728 [2], [3]. … Hufft v. Kuhn, Mo., 277 S.W.2d 552, 555 ; Garrison v. Ryno, Mo., 328 S.W.2d 557, 564 .
Cited 10 timesPublishedSearcy v. Noll Welty Lumber Co.
295 Mo. 188 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jul 27, 1922
[Stephens v. Macon, 83 Mo. 345 .] … [Saxon v. Transfer Co., 145 Mo. App. 693 .] The judgment of the trial court is affirmed. Small, C., concurs; Brown, C., absent.
Cited 5 timesPublished957 S.W.2d 757 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Nov 25, 1997
. ___, 118 S.Ct. 416 , 139 L.Ed.2d 318 ; State v. Brown, 902 S.W.2d 278 (Mo. banc 1995), cert. denied, ___ U.S. ___, 116 S.Ct. 679 , 133 L.Ed.2d 527 (1995). III. … . ___, 118 S.Ct. 416 , 139 L.Ed.2d 318 (1997); State v. Brown, 902 S.W.2d 278 (Mo. banc 1995), cert. denied, ___ U.S. ___, 116 S.Ct. 679 , 133 L.Ed.2d 527 (1995). Point denied. VIII.
Cited 57 timesPublishedState ex rel. Trammel v. Hannibal & St. Joseph Railroad
101 Mo. 136 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Apr 15, 1890
State v. Railroad, 60 Mo. 143 . … Railroad v. Shacklett, 30 Mo. 550 ; State v. Railroad, 37 Mo. 266 ; Livingston County v. Railroad, 60 Mo. 516 .
Cited 12 timesPublished
Ask Donna