Case law

State v. Edwards

345 Mo. 929 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Feb 21, 1940

There is an enlightening discussion of option contracts of this general character in Brown on Personal Property (1936), section 78, pages 259-263. [See also: State v. Rieger, 59 Minn. 151 , 60 N. W. 1087 ; Barnes v. … See also Milbrath v. State, 138 Wis. 354 , 120 N. W. 252 , 131 Am. St. Rep. 1012 ; State v. Matkins, 326 Mo. 1072, 1080 , 34 S. W. (2d) 1, 4 (3); Goffe v. National Surety Co., 321 Mo. 140, 153 , 9 S.

State v. Balch

178 Mo. 392 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Dec 9, 1903

.$ 1.35* ......days’ board at ......................$...... ......days’ board at ......................$.....- ......days’ board at ......................$....... ......other accounts.......................$...... … [State v. Bonner, 178 Mo. 424 .] III.

State ex rel. Pullum v. Consolidated School District No. 5

361 Mo. 114 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Nov 13, 1950

of the Teachers’ fund, except as otherwise provided; that “each and every warrant shall be paid from its appropriate fund, as provided by law,” and “provided further, that after all incidental obligations are paid, the board … Hufft v. Knight (Mo. App.), 121 S. W. 2d 762 , 764[7, 8, 10]; State ex rel. Wood v. Hamilton (Mo. App.), 136 S. W. 2d 699 , 700[1, 2].

Shelby County R-IV School District v. Herman

392 S.W.2d 609 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jul 12, 1965

Kansas City Power & Light Co. v. Salmark Home Builders, Inc., Mo.Sup., 350 S.W.2d 771 ; State ex rel. State Highway Comm. v. Howald, Mo.Sup., 315 S.W.2d 786 ; Constitution, Art. V, § 3, V.A.M.S. … One board member talked to landowner “the better part of two hours” about purchasing the land. On April 10, 1964 the board authorized Mr. Nevins to offer $13,500 for the acreage desired ($300 per acre).

Nulsen v. National Pigments & Chemical Co.

346 Mo. 1246 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Dec 11, 1940

[Scanlon v. Kansas City, 325 Mo. 125 , 28 S.W.2d 84 , 90; McMurtrey v. Kopke (Mo.), 250 S.W. 399 , 401.] … Ann. 1136); Shearer v. Guardian Trust Company, supra ( 136 Mo. App. 229 , 233); Walkof v. Fox, 153 N.Y.S. 27 , 90 Misc. 338 , affirmed Walkof v. Fox, 155 N.Y.S. 1146 , 171 A.D. 908 .]

Kettler v. Hampton

365 S.W.2d 518 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jan 14, 1963

He cites Davidson v. Hennegin, Mo., 304 S.W.2d 836, 839 [6] ; Bates v. Brown Shoe Co., 342 Mo. 411 , 116 S.W.2d 31, 33 [3, 4] ; Lindsay v. Wille, Mo., 348 S.W.2d 1, 4 [5-6], and Pietraschke v. … Highfill v. Brown, Mo., 340 S.W.2d 656, 663 [9]. Some danger should exist toward which precautions are to be directed if a defendant is to be held for failing to take precautions.

Kelly v. Murdagh

184 Mo. 377 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Nov 23, 1904

These statutes are fully construed and explained in Harness v. Cravens, 126 Mo. 233 ; Tooker v. Leake, 146 Mo. 419 ; Winningham v. Trueblood, 149 Mo. 572 ; Cummings v. Brown, 181 Mo. 711 .

Kirby v. Heaton

315 Mo. 338 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jul 30, 1926

We quote from a certified copy of the opinion in the case of Taylor v. … [Koerner v. Leathe, 149 Mo. 361 , 51 S. W. 96 .] In Mitchel v. Curran, 1 Mo.

Barnes v. Bailey

706 S.W.2d 25 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Feb 19, 1986

Moore v. Brown, 350 Mo. 256 , 165 S.W.2d 657, 663 (banc 1942). … See Scott v. Dunaway, 228 Ark. 943 , 311 S.W.2d 305 (1958); Ginsberg v. Centennial Turf Club, 126 Colo. 471 , 251 P.2d 926 (1952); Oneida County Fair Board v. Smylie, 86 Idaho 341 , 386 P.2d 374 (1963); Rohan v.

People ex rel. Hubbard & Moffitt Commission Co. v. Cochrane

264 Mo. 581 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Apr 1, 1915

[Munn v. Illinois, 94 U. S. 113 .] … [Barnes v. Webster, 16 Mo. 258 ; State ex rel. Jean v. Horn, 94 Mo. 162 ; Henoch v. Chaney, 61 Mo. 129 ; LaCrosse Lbr. Co. v. Schwartz, 163 Mo. App. 659 ; State ex rel. McKown v.

State Ex Inf. McAllister Ex Rel. Manion v. Albany Drainage District

290 Mo. 33 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Oct 8, 1921

In People v. … Rose v.

State v. DeGroat

259 Mo. 364 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jun 23, 1914

medicine or surgery, upon conviction of any such offense, as is above defined, shall be subject to have his license or authority to practice his profession as physician or surgeon in the State of Missouri revoked by the State board … J., and Brown, J., concur.

Hawkins v. Paeben

332 Mo. 479 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Mar 16, 1933

At this time the board of directors of the company adopted a resolution giving Hunsehe, the president of the company, “full authority to settle up the matter as best he *482 knew how.” … [Morrow v. Mo. Gas & Elec. Service Co., 315 Mo. 367 , l. c. 380, 286 S. W. 106 ; Applegate v. Railroad, 252 Mo. 173 , l. c. 182, 158 S. W. 376 ; Finley v. Williams, 325 Mo. 688 , l. c. 694, 29 S. W. (2d) 103 .]

State v. Petrechko

486 S.W.2d 217 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Nov 13, 1972

See State v. Selle, supra. Appellant cites State v. Osborne, Mo, 246 S.W. 878 ; State v. Williams, 324 Mo. 179 , 22 S.W.2d 649 ; State v. Fleming, Mo, 177 S.W. 299 ; and State v. Brown, Mo., 217 S.W.2d 546 . … State v. Walters, Mo., 457 S.W.2d 817 ; Kirby v. Illinois, 406 U.S. 682 , 92 S.Ct. 1877 , 32 L.Ed.2d 411 . The judgment is affirmed. HOUSER, C., concurs.

Rines v. Mansfield

96 Mo. 394 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Oct 15, 1888

Warne v. Brown, 102 Pa. St. 347. In case of Green v. … This objection is fully answered by the case of Hagerman v. Sutton, 91 Mo. 519 . The above case also answers the further objection made by defendant to-the effect, that, as the note signed by Mrs.

Cape Girardeau Sand Co. v. Unemployment Compensation Commission

353 Mo. 828 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jan 2, 1945

The case of Shore Fishery v. [609] Board of Review of Unemployment Compensation Commission et al., 127 N.J.L. 87 , 21 A.2d 634 , involved a question somewhat similar to the one here. … In South Chicago Coal Dock Company v.

Coy v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.

363 Mo. 810 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jan 9, 1953

Brown v. R. J. Brown Co., 351 Mo. 557 , 172 S. W. (2) 645; Phillips v. Air Reduction Sales Co., 337 Mo. 587 , 85 S. W. (2) 551; Lewis v. Lowe & Campbell Athletic Goods Co., (Mo.) 247 S. W. (2) 800; Cameron v. … Werner v. Pioneer Cooperage Co., (Mo. App.) 155 S. W. (2) 319; Hilse v. Cameron, Joyce Const. Co., (Mo. App.) 194 S. W. (2) 760; Mossman v. Chicago & Southern Airlines, 236 Mo. App. 282 , 153 S. W. (2) 799 ; Goetz v. J.

White v. Irvine

324 Mo. 342 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Dec 30, 1929

White v. John C. Greenway, 303 Mo. 691 , 263 S. W. 104 .] Thereafter this suit to partition the lot was instituted in the Circuit Court of Jackson County, at Independence. … Respondents cite Landers Investment Co. v. Brown, 300 Mo. 348 . 254 S. W. 14 . Tn that case Lizzie M.

Kuehn v. Hahn

380 S.W.2d 445 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jul 13, 1964

Dever, Mo., 303 S.W.2d 1, 7 [13]. where it was said, quoting Brown v. Callicotte, Mo., 73 S.W.2d 190 , 193, and Shaw v. … Golian v. Stanley, Mo., 334 S.W.2d 88, 91 [1-3]. Skadal v. Brown, Mo., 351 S.W.2d 684, 690 [16-18]; Walton v. United States Steel Corporation, Mo., 362 S.W.2d 617, 626 .

Searcy v. Noll Welty Lumber Co.

295 Mo. 188 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jul 27, 1922

[Stephens v. Macon, 83 Mo. 345 .] … [Saxon v. Transfer Co., 145 Mo. App. 693 .] The judgment of the trial court is affirmed. Small, C., concurs; Brown, C., absent.