Case law

State v. Ballance

207 Mo. 607 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Dec 10, 1907

Brown, 168 Mo. 449 , and State v. Birks, 199 Mo. 271 . We think this criticism of the information is not well founded. … [State v. Gartrell, 171 Mo. l. c. 516, 517; State v. Gordon, 191 Mo. l. c. 125.]

State Ex Rel. Consolidated School District No. 3 v. Smith

341 Mo. 807 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Nov 4, 1937

The following cases are to the same effect: Wightman v. Tecumseh, 157 Mich. 326 , 122 N. W. 122 ; State ex rel. Short v. Clausen, 72 Wash. 409 , 130 Pac. 479 ; Hopkins v. Duluth, 81 Minn. 189 , 83 N. W. 536 . … To the contrary, however, are the cases of Eufaula v. Gibson, 22 Okla. 507 , 98 Pac. 565 , and Smith v. Board of Commrs. of Renville County, 64 Minn. 16 , 65 N. W. 956 .

Worley v. Inhabitants of Columbia

88 Mo. 106 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Oct 15, 1885

Hunt v. City of Boonville, 65 Mo. 620 ; Rowland v. City of Gallatin, 75 Mo. 134 ; Thompson v. City of Boonville, 61 Mo. 282 . … In Perley v.

State ex rel. Leon v. Taylor and Willie Kelly Owens, Relators v. Terry Russell

449 S.W.3d 380 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Dec 9, 2014

V, sec. 4. A litigant seeking mandamus must “allege and prove that he [or she] has a clear, unequivocal, specific right to a thing claimed.” State ex rel. Young v. … Mertens v. Brown, 198 S.W.3d 616, 618 (Mo. banc 2006).

Rutherford v. Taylor

38 Mo. 315 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jul 15, 1866

Cowen, 4 Paige, 510 ; Rector v. Hartt, 8 Mo. 448 ; City of Hannibal v. Draper, 15 Mo. 634 ; Brown v. Manning, 6 Ohio, 129; Town of Pawlet v. Clark, 9 Cranch, 292 ; Cincinnati v. White, 6 Pet. 432 ; Lane v. … And in Doe v.

State v. Burks

159 Mo. 568 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Feb 12, 1901

Immediately after he obtained the forty dollars, defendant boarded a freight train and went to Dixon, another town, a short distance away. One H. O. … It was held in State v.

State Ex Rel. Johnson v. Sevier

339 Mo. 483 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Oct 20, 1936

Rutledge v. School Board, 131 Mo. l. c. 514, 33 S. W. 3 ; People ex rel. Van Dyke v. Railroad, 42 Fed. l. c. 641.] … The school board reserved the right to reject any or all bids. The contract was awarded to the highest bidder.

In Matter of Estate of Hall

337 Mo. 658 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jul 30, 1935

Baldwin v. Jessamine Withers Home, 34 A. L. R. 628, l. c. 681.] … In Pittsburgh, etc., Ry. v. Bd. of Pub. Works, 172 U.

Simmons v. Cabanne

177 Mo. 336 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Nov 3, 1903

[RoBards v. Brown, 167 Mo. l. c. 457.] … [Small v. Field, 102 Mo. l. c. 122; Cross v. Hoch, 149 Mo. l. c. 336; Hurst v. Von De Veld, 158 Mo. l. c. 246; Walton v. Drumtra, 152 Mo. l. c. 497; RoBards v. Brown, 167 Mo. 447 .]

Southworth v. Mayor of Glasgow

232 Mo. 108 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Dec 31, 1910

Co. v. … Co. v.

State Ex Inf. McKittrick v. Ark.-Mo. Power Co.

339 Mo. 15 · Supreme Court of Missouri · May 2, 1936

On May 7, 1935, at a regular meeting of the Board of Aider-men, of the city of Campbell, the board adopted a resolution directing the city attorney, upon the expiration on May 12, 1935, of the contract aforesaid, to procure … Manion v. Albany Drainage Dist., 290 Mo. 33 , 234 S. W. 339 ; State ex inf. Hadley v. Standard Oil Co., 218 Mo. 1 , 116 S. W. 902 ; State ex inf. Shartel ex rel. City of Sikeston v.

Dubowsky v. Binggeli

258 Mo. 197 · Supreme Court of Missouri · May 26, 1914

BROWN, J. — Tbis is an action to set aside tbe release of a deed of trust and to foreclose tbe same. *199 The plaintiff had judgment helow for' $602.33, and defendants appeal. … [Lohmeyer v. St. Louis Cordage Co., 214 Mo. 685 ; State v. Gamma, 215 Mo. 100 ; Hartzler v. Met. Street Ry. Co., 218 Mo. 562 ; Howell v. Sherwood, 242 Mo. 513 .]

Eichenlaub v. City of St. Joseph

18 L.R.A. 590 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jan 23, 1893

Saxton v. Beach, 50 Mo. 488 ; Saxton v. St. Joseph, 60 Mo. 158 ; Thompson v. Boonville, 61 Mo. 283 ; Irvin v. Devors, 65 Mo. 627 ; Trenton v. Coyle, 107 Mo. 194 . … McKibbin v. Fort Smith, 35 Ark. 352 ; Klingler v. Bickel, 117 Pa. St. 326; King v. Davenport, 98 Ill. 305 ; Baumgartner v. Hasty, 100 Ind. 575 ; Hine v. New Haven, 40 Conn. 478 .

Harmon v. Donohoe

153 Mo. 263 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Dec 22, 1899

[Browning v. Railroad, 124 Mo. l. c. 71.] However as pointed out he did ask and the court gave explanatory instructions, and the defendant has nothing to complain of in this respect. … Instruction numbered five, given for plaintiff, is subject»to verbal criticism, but it is in fuller form than the instruction on the measure of damages, which was approved in Browning v.

State ex rel. Wander v. Kimmel

256 Mo. 611 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Apr 2, 1914

It was under section 46, art. 4, that the Board of Control of the St. Louis School and Museum of Fine Arts was denied the right to participate in public funds-(State ex rel. v. St. … In White v.

State Ex Rel. Carlton v. Haynes

552 S.W.2d 710 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jun 14, 1977

The court shall also send a copy of the order of final discharge to the board of probation and parole if the defendant has been under the supervision of the board. … Lamar v. Impey, 283 S.W.2d 480, 483 (Mo. banc 1955). Of course, no unreasonable delay should occur in affording the probationer a hearing. Gagnon v.

Powers v. Shore

248 S.W.2d 1 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Apr 14, 1952

Brown v. Moore, Mo.Sup., 248 S.W.2d 553 , not yet reported in the State Reports; Missouri Electric Power Co. v. City of Mountain Grove, 352 Mo. 262 , 176 S.W.2d 612, 616 (10); Holland Banking Co. v. Republic Nat. … Brown, 49 A.2d 311 , 24 N.J.Misc. 350; Bernofsky v. Rabinowitz, 191 Misc. 382 , 77 N.Y.S.2d 608 ; Alabiso v. Schuster, 273 App.Div. 655 , 80 N.Y.S.2d 314 ; Nyulassie v. Mozer, 85 Cal. App.2d Supp. 827, 193 P.2d 167 .

Peck's Products Company v. Bannister

362 S.W.2d 596 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Dec 11, 1962

Ulman v. Evans, (Mo.) 247 S.W.2d 693, 694 ; Drey v. State Tax Commission, (Mo.) 345 S.W.2d 228, 234 . … Louis Electric Bridge Co. v. Koeln, supra; Brinkerhoff-Faris Trust & Savings Co. v. Hill, supra; Bank of Carthage v. Thomas, 330 Mo. 19 , 48 S.W.2d 930 . For the reasons indicated the judgment is affirmed.

Mansfield v. Wagner Electric Manufacturing Co.

294 Mo. 235 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jun 8, 1922

In Rutledge v. Mo. Pac. Ry. … In Denton v.

Sherlock v. Kansas City Belt Railway Co.

142 Mo. 172 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Dec 22, 1897

In Brown v. … There is no conflict between the views here expressed and the opinion in Brown v. Railroad, 137 Mo. 529 . The judgment is affirmed. Sherwood and Burgess, JJ.,-concur.