Case law

Kemmerling v. Karl Koch Erecting Co.

338 Mo. 252 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jan 4, 1936

There is no evidence in the record that deceased paid more to the Ostmann family than would have been reasonable for board and room. … [Leilich v. Chevrolet Motor Co., 328 Mo. 112 , 40 S.W.2d 601 ; Decker v. Raymond Concrete Pile Co., 336 Mo. 1116 , 82 S.W.2d 267 .]

State Ex Rel. Brewen-Clark Syrup Co. v. Missouri Workmen's Compensation Commission

320 Mo. 893 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jul 30, 1928

[Underwood v. McDuffee, 15 Mich. 361 ; Hunter v. Coal Company, 175 Iowa, 245, 307-318 .] … [State ex rel. v. Harty, 276 Mo. 583 , 208 S. W. 835 .]

Union Electric Co. v. Toulouse

572 S.W.2d 167 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jul 24, 1978

V, § 3. I. … They support this contention by reliance upon Missouri Pacific Railroad Co. v.

Sumrall v. Sun Mutual Insurance

40 Mo. 27 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Mar 15, 1867

He had done all that the law imposed upon him, and the obligation of the company to pay him interest upon that amount, at such rate as the board of directors should prescribe, was full and complete. … S. v.

Webb v. Rockefeller

195 Mo. 57 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Mar 29, 1906

In Bradley v. … In Bedford v.

In re Brown

518 S.W.2d 289 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jan 13, 1975

Brown, appellant, was tried before a jury in the Circuit Court of Jasper County and resulted in a unanimous verdict that appellant was competent. … A recent example is Roe v. Wade, 410 U.S. 113 , 93 S.Ct. 705 , 35 L.Ed.2d 147 (1973), pertaining to the issue of abortion. See also, Morley v. Ryan, 461 S.W.2d 7 (Mo.1970); and State v.

State Ex Rel. Barrett v. Sartorius

351 Mo. 1237 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Dec 6, 1943

Louis requiring relators (Board of Election Commissioners) to permit C.L. Owen to be registered as a qualified voter. … Olson v. Langer (N.D.), 256 N.W. 377 , construing the voter's disqualification section of the North Dakota Constitution using similar broad general terms. [See also Irby v. Day (Ark.), 32 S.W.2d 157 ; State v.

State v. Johnston

957 S.W.2d 734 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Dec 23, 1997

State v. Brown, 902 S.W.2d 278, 284 (Mo.banc 1996). … State v. Kinder, 942 S.W.2d 313, 324 (Mo. banc 1996). Venireperson Brown Johnston challenges the trial court’s action in sustaining the State’s motion to dismiss venireperson Brown for cause.

State v. McDonough

232 Mo. 219 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Feb 7, 1911

[State v. Simon, 50 Mo. 370 ; State *228 v. Dawson, 90 Mo. 149 ; State v. Brown, 159 Mo. 646 ; State v. Hughes, 82 Mo. 86 .] II. Appellant contends that the verdict is insufficient to support the judgment. … Ferriss and Brown, JJ., concur.

Jackson County v. Kansas City

722 S.W.2d 67 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Dec 16, 1986

See also, State v. Hampton, 653 S.W.2d 191 (Mo. banc 1983); State v. Burnau, 642 S.W.2d 621 (Mo. banc 1982); Brown v. Morris, 365 Mo. 946 , 290 S.W.2d 160 (1956); Ludlow-Saylor Wire Co. v. … See, e.g., Starr v. Crenshaw, 279 Mo. 344 , 213 S.W. 811 (1919). Young v. Lanyon, 242 S.W. 685 (Mo.App.1922).

Block v. Morrison

112 Mo. 343 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Nov 28, 1892

The claim was presented to the first board of commissioners for confirmation, but the board rejected and disallowed it on the thirty-first of January, 1811. … Papin v. Massey, 27 Mo. 445 ; Hart v. Logan, 49 Mo. 47 ; Morgan v. Bouse, 53 Mo. 219 .

Connor v. Monkem Co., Inc.

898 S.W.2d 89 · Supreme Court of Missouri · May 30, 1995

I concur in all but Part V of the majority opinion. I do not join Part V because, in my opinion, it is obiter dictum that does not reflect the Court’s experience. … To the extent those “difficulties” exist, they are the product of this Court’s decision in O’Grady v. Brown, 654 S.W.2d 904 (Mo. banc 1983), not of the Court’s decision today.

State Ex Rel. Taylor v. Nangle

360 Mo. 122 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Feb 13, 1950

Ry. v. Wear, 135 Mo. 230 , 36 S. W. 357 ; State ex rel. Rogers v. Rombauer, 105 Mo. 103 , 16 S. W. 695 ; State ex rel. Ellis v. Elkin, 130 Mo. 90 , 30 S. W. 333 ; State ex rel. Schoenfelder v. … AYe held that original jurisdiction to decide the controversy was vested in the Federal Mediation Board, but that the circuit court had jurisdiction to enjoin the discharge of the plaintiff employees until the Mediation Board

Ash v. City of Independence

145 Mo. 120 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jun 22, 1898

Campbell v. St. Louis Court of Appeals, 97 Mo. l. c. 281; Baldwin v. Fries, 103 Mo. l. c. 287; State ex rel. Dugan v. … Oxley Stave Co. v. Butler Co., 166 U. S. 648 . In State ex rel. Dugan v.

State Ex Rel. Missouri Electric Power Co. v. Allen

340 Mo. 44 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Dec 14, 1936

[State ex rel. v. Smith, 176 Mo. 44, 48 , 75 S. W. 468 ; Brown v. M., K. & T. Ry. Co., 175 Mo. 185, 188 , 74 S. W. 973 ; Syz v. Milk Wagon Drivers’ Union, 323 Mo. 130 , 18 S. W. (2d) 441, 443 ; . . . State ex rel. … W. 749 , and comprehensively reannounced in Brown v. M., K. & T. Ry. Co., 175 Mo. 185 , l. c. 188, 74 S. W. 973 , in language much the same as we have here employed.

Bi Go Markets, Inc. v. Morton

843 S.W.2d 916 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Dec 18, 1992

Nebraska State Board of Equalization and Assessment, 347 U.S. 590, 598 , 74 S.Ct. 757, 762 , 98 L.Ed. 967 (1954); Complete Auto Transit v. … In Braniff Airways, Inc. v.

Bales v. Butts

309 Mo. 142 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jun 5, 1925

Commissioner BROWN, in an able discussion of this subject, in Auxier v. … As sustaining the principles of law declared in Judge BROWN's opinion, supra, we call attention to the following authorities: Kuhlman v. Stewart, 282 Mo. 108 , 221 S.W. 31 ; Daudt v.

State v. Millin

318 Mo. 553 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Dec 12, 1927

[See also State v. Coulter, 204 S. W. 5 ; State v. Beckham, 306 Mo. 566 , 267 S. W. 817 ; State v. Winkler, 309 Mo. 28 , 273 S. W. 1040 ; State v. Miller, 234 S. W. 813 .] … [State v.

Lieser v. Bi-State Development Agency of the Missouri-illinois Metropolitan District

509 S.W.2d 53 · Supreme Court of Missouri · May 13, 1974

I concur in the result reached in this case but not upon the authority of Lacks v. Wells, 329 Mo. 327 , 44 S.W.2d 154 (1931), and Smuzynski v. East St. Louis Ry. Co., 230 Mo.App. 1095 , 93 S.W.2d 1058 (1936). … To some extent Feldotto v. St.

Eureka Real Estate & Investment Co. v. Southern Real Estate & Financial Co.

355 Mo. 1199 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Mar 10, 1947

Highway Comm. v. … Stamm Electric Co. v. Hamilton-Brown Shoe Co., 350 Mo. 1178 , 1182, 171 S.W.2d 580 , 583; Brown v. Weare, 348 Mo. 135 , 152 S.W.2d 649 ; Neil v. Independent Realty Co., 317 Mo. 1235 , 298 S.W. 363 , 70 A.L.R. 550 .