Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
3.07s
315 Mo. 405 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jul 30, 1926
In Luth v. Kansas City, 203 Mo. … Y. 514, 519 .] ‘ ‘ The word ‘ appointed ’ means named or designated for or assigned to an office.” [1 Words & Phrases, page 458, citing Brown v. O’Connell, 36 Conn. 432, 447 , 4 Am. Rep. 89 .]
Cited 9 timesPublished251 Mo. 390 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jun 28, 1913
Wilson also testified that.he did not know whether or not defendant knew Brown. … Jones, 51 Mo. 316 ; Graham v. Railroad, 66 Mo. 536 ; Seibel v. Siemon, 72 Mo. 526 ; Bruce v. Ulery, 79 Mo. 322 ; Brown v. Plank Road Co., 89 Mo. 152 ; Welsh v. Stewart, 31 Mo. App. 376 ; Prueitt v.
Cited 17 timesPublished518 S.W.2d 289 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jan 13, 1975
Brown, appellant, was tried before a jury in the Circuit Court of Jasper County and resulted in a unanimous verdict that appellant was competent. … A recent example is Roe v. Wade, 410 U.S. 113 , 93 S.Ct. 705 , 35 L.Ed.2d 147 (1973), pertaining to the issue of abortion. See also, Morley v. Ryan, 461 S.W.2d 7 (Mo.1970); and State v.
Cited 1 timesPublishedMarshall v. St. Louis, Kansas City & Northern Railway Co.
78 Mo. 610 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Oct 15, 1883
It was in the night, but the train finally came along, and I got on board. … On the authority of the case of Trigg v. St. Louis, K. C. & N.
Cited 14 timesPublishedJustin D. O'Brien v. Department of Public Safety
Supreme Court of Missouri · Dec 10, 2019
In Younge v. … State Board of Registration for the Healing Arts, 916 S.W.2d 311 (Mo. App. 1995), Gard v. State Board of Registration for the Healing Arts, 747 S.W.2d 726 (Mo. App. 1988), or Wasem v.
Cited 0 timesPublished26 Mo. 598 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Mar 15, 1858
The plaintiff sued the defendant for boarding his wife and for necessaries furnished to her during a temporary separation from her husband. … (Williams v. Pierce, 3 Strob. 490 .)
Cited 8 timesPublished484 S.W.2d 236 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Sep 11, 1972
This argument has been made and rejected on several occasions and this instruction has been approved repeatedly, beginning with State v. Brown, Mo.Sup. en Banc, 443 S.W.2d 805 . State v. … Gates, Mo.Sup., 471 S.W.2d 272 ; State v. Mills, Mo.Sup., 465 S.W.2d 554 ; State v. Thompson, Mo.Sup., 465 S.W.2d 590 ; State v. Ransburg, Mo.Sup., 466 S.W.2d 691 ; State v.
Cited 16 timesPublishedState ex rel. Ward v. Atchison
173 Mo. 164 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Mar 18, 1903
On September 29, 1899, John Ward, late of .said county, deceased, gave a list of his taxable property to Phillip V. … Ferguson v. Moss, 69 Mo. 495 , in which it was held to be constitutional, and State v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedChesed Shel Emeth Society v. Unemployment Compensation Commission
356 Mo. 726 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jun 9, 1947
The Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts in the case of Proprietors of Cemetery of Mount Auburn v. Fuchs et al., 25 N. E. 2d 759 , the Supreme Court of Wisconsin in the case of Industrial Commission v. … Northeast Osteopathic Hospital v. Keitel, 355 Mo. 740 , 197 S. W. 2d 970 .
Cited 2 timesPublished264 Mo. 441 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Mar 30, 1915
Wisdom, supra, for example, State v. Thomas, 250 Mo. 189 , and State v. … [State v. Concelia, 250 Mo. 411 ; State v. Bass, 251 Mo. 107 .] III.
Cited 5 timesPublished313 Mo. 476 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Apr 5, 1926
[Quail v. Lomas, 200 Mo. 674 ; McFadin v. Board, 188 Mo. 688 .] This subject received critical and illuminating consideration in Chrisman v. Linderman, 202 Mo. l. c. 620, et seq. … Brown, 171 Mo. 207 ; Meyer v. Nickerson, 101 Mo. 184 ; Murphy v. Wilson, 84 Mo. App. 178 ).
Cited 2 timesPublished241 Mo. 292 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Mar 21, 1912
[State v. Hayward, 83 Mo. 299 .] We therefore think the information is insufficient to support the judgment. … Kevmish and Brown, JJ., concur.
Cited 1 timesPublished30 Mo. 202 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Mar 15, 1860
I consider the case as decided by the case of Cochran v. … It has been suggested that the survey of Brown of two tracts in one may be treated as the authoritative government survey; and if so, that there is nothing in the principle deter *209 mined in Cochran v.
Cited 1 timesPublishedInter-City Fire Protection District v. Gambrel
360 Mo. 924 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jun 13, 1950
Sec. 13,927.81) and said board on February 19, 1949 duly notified the county court of Jackson county of said rate of levy so fixed by the board and directed the court to levy such tax on-behalf of the plaintiff district as … Pollock v. Becker, 289 Mo. 660 , 233 S. W. 641, 645 ; State ex rel. Westhues v. Sullivan, supra; State ex rel. Asotsky v. Regan, 317 Mo. 1216 , 298 S. W. 747, 748 .
Cited 11 timesPublishedMyers v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad
296 Mo. 239 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Dec 20, 1922
That morning we had worked on the track just north of Browning. He (John E. … Ragland, C., concurs; Brown, C., absent.
Cited 14 timesPublished239 Mo. 674 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Feb 6, 1912
BROWN, J. — Indictment under section 4556, Revised Statutes 1909, charging embezzlement by a public officer of more than thirty dollars. … [Southwest Missouri Light Company v. Scheurich, 174 Mo. 235 .]
Cited 8 timesPublished333 Mo. 1201 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Oct 19, 1933
W. 798, 806 ; McMillan v. Richards, 70 Am. Dec. 655 , 675; Blunt v. Walker, 78 Am. Dec. 709 , 714, 718; Rayburn v. Day, 27 Ill. 46 ; Brown v. Dunckel, 46 Mich. 29 ; Chamberlain Banking House v. Woolsey, 60 Neb. 516 .] … [Holland v. Rongey, 168 Mo. 16 , 67 S. W. 568 ; McMurray v. Taylor, 30 Mo. 263 ; Bertiaux v. Dillon, 20 Mo. App. 603 ; Schepflin v. Dessar, 20 Mo. App. 569 ; Bank v. Peterman, 21 Mo. App. 512 ; O’Bryan v. Jones, 38 Mo.
Cited 3 timesPublishedCarruthers v. City of St. Louis
341 Mo. 1073 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Dec 14, 1937
[Clinkenbeard v. St. … Plaintiff relies upon Boyd v.
Cited 20 timesPublished94 Mo. 22 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Oct 15, 1887
Gratz Brown, commuted his punishment to imprisonment in the penitentiary for and during the term of his natural life. … The constitution of this state authorizes the Governor, after conviction, which means after return of a verdict of guilty (Commonwealth v.
Cited 15 timesPublished272 S.W.2d 190 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Nov 8, 1954
In State v. … State v. Brown, 75 Mo. 317 ; State v. Stanfield, Mo.Sup., 1 S.W.2d 834 ; State v. Bowman, *193 Mo.Sup., 12 S.W.2d 51 ; State v. Kenyon, 343 Mo. 1168 , 126 S.W.2d 245 .”
Cited 20 timesPublished
Ask Donna