Case law

Magner v. City of St. Louis

179 Mo. 495 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Feb 10, 1904

, and *500 may be removed by the Mayor for cause, or by the Commissioner and President of the Board of Public Improvements whenever the interests of the city require it.” … Knittel v. Longfellow, 93 Mo. App. 364 ; State ex rel. Bartraw v. Longfellow, 95 Mo. App. 660 ; State ex rel. Magner v. Longfellow, 95 Mo. App. 668 .]

Smith Ex Rel. Roth v. Mederacke

302 Mo. 538 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Feb 11, 1924

In support of this contention, Cause Switzer v. Baker, 160 N.W. l.c. 375, is cited. … This is the rule as announced by the Supreme Court in the recent case of Browning v. Railroad, 124 Mo. 55 . The cases of Schaub v. Railroad, 106 Mo. 93 , and McGowan v.

Kelly v. Thuey

143 Mo. 422 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Mar 29, 1898

Matthews v. Coalter, 9 Mo. 696, 702 ; Lubbering v. Kolilbrecher, 22 Mo. 596 ; McCormick v. Fitzmorris, 39 Mo. 24, 34 ; Paramore v. Lindsey, 63 Mo. 63, 66, 67 ; Holton v. Kemp, 81 Mo. 661 ; Stillwell v. … See, also, Grafton v. Cummings, 99 U. S. 100, 106 ; 8 Am. and Eng. Ency. of Law, 726; Browne, Stat. Frauds [5 Ed.], sec. 376; 1 Warvelle on Vendors, p. 105, sec. 10; Fry, Spec. Perf., sec. 335; Waterman, Spec.

State v. Cochran

356 Mo. 778 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jul 14, 1947

Defendant says that no witness could be allowed to so testify because such an opinion would be an invasion of the province of the jury, citing State v. Brown, 181 Mo. 192 , l. c. 215, 79 S. W. 1111 ; and State v. … The McCann ease cited the Brown case and State v. Schlichter, 263 Mo. 561 , 173 S. W. 1072 , in which this question was asked a lay witness. [See also State v. Evans, 345 Mo. 398 , 133 S.

Boeger v. Langenberg

97 Mo. 390 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Oct 15, 1888

from timber of defendants ; that the boards belonged to them and were on plaintiff’s premises, etc. … Williams v. Van Meter, 8 Mo. 339 ; Townshend on Slander, 709, and cas. cit.; 2 Greenl. Ev., sec. 455. The circuit court, therefore, correctly ruled as to the third count.

Darby v. Henwood

346 Mo. 1204 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Dec 11, 1940

what was the matter with him; that he and Brown and a Mr. … [Lappin v.

State v. Robinson

639 S.W.2d 823 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Oct 12, 1982

Appellant returned to his automobile, opened the driver’s door, rummaged around the driver’s area, and then came out with a small brown bag. … See State v. Olson, 636 S.W.2d 318 (Mo. banc 1982).

Hanch v. K. F. C. National Management Corp.

615 S.W.2d 28 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Apr 6, 1981

The Board found an unfair labor practice in that the letter interfered with the laboratory conditions in which union elections are to be conducted. … The employer appealed claiming that the Board’s Laboratory Condition standard interfered with the employer’s right of free speech.

State ex rel. Stevenson v. Kirkpatrick

536 S.W.2d 740 · Supreme Court of Missouri · May 21, 1976

Hulen v. … Thompson, 38 Mo. 192 ; State ex rel. v. Ranson, 73 Mo. 78 .”

State Ex Rel. Gagnepain v. Daues

322 Mo. 376 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Mar 27, 1929

Paine v. Trimble, 290 S. W. (Mo.) 132; State ex rel. Egan v. Trimble, 291 S. W. (Mo.) 468.] … Wallace v. Lincoln, 274 S. W.

State v. Hoeffner

124 Mo. 488 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Nov 5, 1894

In Humphreys v. … Perrigo, 9 Johns. 259 ; Brown v. Harley, 2 Fla. 159 ; Ellis v. Jones, 51 Mo. 187 . We think the rule thus announced in harmony with our code and the understanding of the profession generally.

Chamber of Commerce v. Unemployment Compensation Commission

356 Mo. 323 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Apr 21, 1947

Board of Review of Dept. of Labor et al., 392 Ill. 614 , 65 N.E.2d 350 ; Better Business Bureau of Washington, D.C., Inc. v. United States, 66 Sup. Ct. 112. … See Colony Town Club v. Michigan Unemployment Compensation Commission, 301 Mich. 107 , 3 N.W.2d 28 ; American Medical Ass'n. v. Board of Review of Dept. of Labor, supra.

Twiehaus v. Wright City

412 S.W.2d 450 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Mar 13, 1967

City of California v. … State Board of Health approval was required before the City permitted connection.

City of St. Louis v. Hollrah

175 Mo. 79 · Supreme Court of Missouri · May 27, 1903

[Markowitz v. Kansas City, 125 Mo. 485 ; Hickman v. City of Kansas, 120 Mo. 110 ; State v. Bittinger, 55 Mo. 596 ; Lindell’s Admr. v. Railroad, 36 Mo. 543 ; Soulard v. St. Louis, 36 Mo. 546 . See also Tackett v. … Vogler, 85 Mo. 480 ; State ex rel. v. St. Louis County Court, 38 Mo. 403 .]

Ex parte See

241 Mo. 292 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Mar 21, 1912

[State v. Hayward, 83 Mo. 299 .] We therefore think the information is insufficient to support the judgment. … Kevmish and Brown, JJ., concur.

State Ex Inf. McAllister Ex Rel. Manion v. Albany Drainage District

290 Mo. 33 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Oct 8, 1921

In People v. … Rose v.

State v. Douglass

239 Mo. 674 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Feb 6, 1912

BROWN, J. — Indictment under section 4556, Revised Statutes 1909, charging embezzlement by a public officer of more than thirty dollars. … [Southwest Missouri Light Company v. Scheurich, 174 Mo. 235 .]

Nulsen v. National Pigments & Chemical Co.

346 Mo. 1246 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Dec 11, 1940

[Scanlon v. Kansas City, 325 Mo. 125 , 28 S.W.2d 84 , 90; McMurtrey v. Kopke (Mo.), 250 S.W. 399 , 401.] … Ann. 1136); Shearer v. Guardian Trust Company, supra ( 136 Mo. App. 229 , 233); Walkof v. Fox, 153 N.Y.S. 27 , 90 Misc. 338 , affirmed Walkof v. Fox, 155 N.Y.S. 1146 , 171 A.D. 908 .]

Peak v. Taubman

251 Mo. 390 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jun 28, 1913

Wilson also testified that.he did not know whether or not defendant knew Brown. … Jones, 51 Mo. 316 ; Graham v. Railroad, 66 Mo. 536 ; Seibel v. Siemon, 72 Mo. 526 ; Bruce v. Ulery, 79 Mo. 322 ; Brown v. Plank Road Co., 89 Mo. 152 ; Welsh v. Stewart, 31 Mo. App. 376 ; Prueitt v.

Bargeon v. Perishable Distributing Co.

465 S.W.2d 571 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Apr 12, 1971

Those rules are set out at length, along with full citation of supporting authority, in Brown v. Missouri Lumber Transports, Inc., Mo.Sup., 456 S.W.2d 306, 307-308 . … See Schepp v. Mid City Trucking. Co., Mo.App., 291 S.W.2d 633 ; Hargis v. United Transports, Mo.App., 274 S.W.2d 339 ; Stroud v. Zuzich, Mo.Sup., 271 S.W.2d 549 ; Brown v. Missouri Lumber Transports, Inc., Mo.