Case law

Davis v. St. Louis Public Service Company

316 S.W.2d 494 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Sep 8, 1958

Bates v. Brown Shoe Co., 342 Mo. 411 , 116 S.W.2d 31, 33 [2-4]; State ex rel. v. Shelton, 249 Mo. 660 , 156 S.W. 955, 965 [2]; State ex rel. Trading Post Co. v. Shain, 342 Mo. 588 , 116 S.W.2d 99, 102 ; Hendrick v. … Hilton v. Terminal R. Ass’n, 345 Mo. 987 , 137 S.W. 2d 520, 522 [4, 5]; Brown v. Kurn, Mo., 161 S.W.2d 421 , 423 [4]; Kimbrough v. Chervitz, 353 Mo. 1154 , 186 S.W.2d 461, 465 [6] and cases cited.

Bright v. Pike County

69 Mo. 519 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Apr 15, 1879

He was tried in Marion county on a change of venue, and the expense of boarding the petit jury was taxed as costs against Pike county by the circuit court of Marion. … The case of the State ex rel. v. Clark, State Auditor, 57 Mo. 25 , is decisive of this. It was there held *520 that there is do provision* of law for the payment of such expenses by the State.

Union Electric Co. v. Toulouse

572 S.W.2d 167 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jul 24, 1978

V, § 3. I. … They support this contention by reliance upon Missouri Pacific Railroad Co. v.

City of St. Louis v. Carpenter

341 S.W.2d 786 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jan 9, 1961

Louis, a municipal corporation, or to employees of the Board of Police Commissioners of the City of St. … Louis v.

City of St. Louis v. Hollrah

175 Mo. 79 · Supreme Court of Missouri · May 27, 1903

[Markowitz v. Kansas City, 125 Mo. 485 ; Hickman v. City of Kansas, 120 Mo. 110 ; State v. Bittinger, 55 Mo. 596 ; Lindell’s Admr. v. Railroad, 36 Mo. 543 ; Soulard v. St. Louis, 36 Mo. 546 . See also Tackett v. … Vogler, 85 Mo. 480 ; State ex rel. v. St. Louis County Court, 38 Mo. 403 .]

St. Louis County v. State

424 S.W.3d 450 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Mar 25, 2014

Ass’n v. State, 256 S.W.3d 85, 87 (Mo. banc 2008). An appellate court assumes that all of the facts alleged in the plaintiffs’ petition are true. Foster v. State, 352 S.W.3d 357, 359 (Mo. banc 2011). … Roberts v. BJC Health System, 391 S.W.3d 433, 438 (Mo. banc 2013)(quoting State ex rel. Williams v. Mauer, 722 S.W.2d 296, 298 (Mo. banc 1986)).

Stanturf v. Sipes

447 S.W.2d 558 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Dec 8, 1969

Duffy for the admission of plaintiff to the hospital] to the Board of Trustees” of the hospital, and they told him that plaintiff was “not eligible,” but it appears that he contacted only one member of that board, Mr. … Compare Cooper v. Finke, supra.

State v. Robinson

639 S.W.2d 823 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Oct 12, 1982

Appellant returned to his automobile, opened the driver’s door, rummaged around the driver’s area, and then came out with a small brown bag. … See State v. Olson, 636 S.W.2d 318 (Mo. banc 1982).

Tillman v. City of Carthage

297 Mo. 74 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Feb 2, 1923

This conclusion is supported by the reasoning in numerous Missouri cases, including the following: Dozier v. Toalson, 180 Mo. 546 ; O’Day v. Meadows, 194 Mo. 588 ; Sims v. Brown, 252 Mo. 58 ; Priest v. … [Standiford v. Standiford, 97 Mo. 231 ; Williams v. Latham, 113 Mo. 165 ; Cook v. Newby, 213 Mo. 471 ; Schooler v. Schooler, 258 Mo. 83 ; Marshall v. Ha rtz felt, 98 Mo. App. 178 ; Meredith v. Meredith, 229 S.

State Ex Rel. Taylor v. Nangle

360 Mo. 122 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Feb 13, 1950

Ry. v. Wear, 135 Mo. 230 , 36 S. W. 357 ; State ex rel. Rogers v. Rombauer, 105 Mo. 103 , 16 S. W. 695 ; State ex rel. Ellis v. Elkin, 130 Mo. 90 , 30 S. W. 333 ; State ex rel. Schoenfelder v. … AYe held that original jurisdiction to decide the controversy was vested in the Federal Mediation Board, but that the circuit court had jurisdiction to enjoin the discharge of the plaintiff employees until the Mediation Board

Holmes v. McNeil

356 Mo. 846 · Supreme Court of Missouri · May 12, 1947

Palmer was looking down toward the floor boards, what you meant was that his head was leaning down toward the floor? A. He was bent over the wheel, like he was looking. … We think the operation of an automobile while looking at the floor boards is also some evidence of negligence. Kaley v. Huntley (Mo. App.), 88 S.W.2d 200 , 204[9-11]; Krause v.

Kimmel v. Benna

70 Mo. 52 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Oct 15, 1879

The first case in which the question comes up directly, and is decided clearly, is in 1862, in the case of Slevin v. Brown, 32 Mo. 176 . … Slevin v. Brown, 32 Mo. 176 . The same position is reiterated in Gibson v.

Hendrick v. Chicago & Alton Railroad

136 Mo. 548 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Dec 23, 1896

Pittsburgh, etc., Railroad v. Krouse, 30 Ohio St. 222 . … Barker v. Railroad, 98 Mo. 50 .

State of Missouri v. Sharnique N. Jones

Supreme Court of Missouri · Apr 15, 2014

Simmons, 944 S.W.2d 165, 177 (Mo. banc 1997) (quoting Brown and declining to grant plain error review regarding admission of testimony); State v. … Clemons, 946 S.W.2d 206, 224 (Mo. banc 1997) (quoting Brown and declining to grant plain error review over all claims not objected to at trial or not raised in a motion for new trial); State v.

State ex rel. Iba v. Mosman

231 Mo. 474 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Dec 17, 1910

In State ex rel. v. … and employees of defendant, carelessly and negligently signaled and .required said train to move before plaintiff’s husband had time to board same, knowing that plaintiff’s husband' was in the act of boarding said train

Darby v. Henwood

346 Mo. 1204 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Dec 11, 1940

what was the matter with him; that he and Brown and a Mr. … [Lappin v.

State v. Dickson

78 Mo. 438 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Oct 15, 1883

McNab boarded with Dickson. … He owes me over $100 for board. He has boarded with me over a year, and has not paid me. He is the d — dest dead beat I ever saw. He shall not eat my bread and meat much longer.”

State v. Hoeffner

124 Mo. 488 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Nov 5, 1894

In Humphreys v. … Perrigo, 9 Johns. 259 ; Brown v. Harley, 2 Fla. 159 ; Ellis v. Jones, 51 Mo. 187 . We think the rule thus announced in harmony with our code and the understanding of the profession generally.

St. Louis County v. State Tax Commission

406 S.W.2d 644 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Sep 12, 1966

Kahler v. State Tax Commission, Mo., 393 S.W.2d 460, 464 [4]; Stein v. State Tax Commission, Mo., 379 S.W.2d 495, 498 [3]; Peck’s Products Company v. Bannister, Mo., 362 S.W.2d 596, 599 [2]; Drey v. … Bond v. Simmons, et al., Mo.App., 299 S.W.2d 540, 545 [5]; Gaddy v. State Board of Registration for Healing Arts, Mo.App., 397 S.W.2d 347, 350 [2]. Mr. Frank J.

Curators of Central College v. Shields

354 Mo. 129 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jul 2, 1945

Lossing v. Shull, 351 Mo. 342 , 173 S.W.2d 1 , 6. … Siemers v. St. Louis Elec. Term. R. Co., 348 Mo. 682 , 155 S.W.2d 130 , 136; Rude v. St.