Case law

State v. Donaldson

243 Mo. 460 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jun 1, 1912

[State v. Roberts, 201 Mo. 702 ; State v. Wilson, 143 Mo. 334 ; State v. Balch, 136 Mo. 103 ; State v. Sarony, 95 Mo. 349 ; State v. Bayne, 88 Mo. 604 ; State v. Myers, 82 Mo. 558 ; 19 Cyc. 443.] In State v. … Brown, P. J., and Perriss, J., concur.

Bender Ex Rel. Bender v. Bender

281 Mo. 473 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Mar 13, 1920

[Viers v. Viers, 175 Mo. l.c. 453; Curd v. Brown, 148 Mo. l.c. 92.] And where the title in such case is taken in the name of both husband and wife an estate by the entirety occurs. [Moss v. Ardrey, 260 Mo. l.c. 604.] … It cannot be created by subsequent Coincident occurrences. 1 Perry on Trusts, sec. 133; Barrett v. With Deed . Foote, 187 S.W. 69 ; Stevenson v. Haynes, 220 Mo. 206 ; Kelly v. Johnson, 28 Mo. 249 ; Richardson v.

Harff v. Green

168 Mo. 308 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Mar 29, 1902

[Barton v. Railroad, 52 Mo. 253 ; Doss v. Railroad, 59 Mo. 27 ; Carroll v. Trans. Co., 107 Mo. 653 ; O’Donnell v. … [Steinhauser v. Spraul, 114 Mo. 551 ; Ibid., 127 Mo. 541 ; Settle v. Railroad, 127 Mo. 336 ; Rains v. Railroad, 71 Mo. 164 ; Hamilton v. Mining Co., 108 Mo. 364 ; Soeder v. Railroad, 100 Mo. 673 ; Shortell v. St.

Derby v. Donahoe

208 Mo. 684 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Dec 24, 1907

In Bishop v. Seal, 87 Mo. … [Durfee v. Moran, 57 Mo. 374 ; Railroad v. Brown, 43 Mo. 294 .]

City of Carthage v. Garner

209 Mo. 688 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Feb 26, 1908

Louis v. Theatre Co., 202 Mo. 690 .] III. … [City of Westport v. Mulholland, 159 Mo. l. c. 92; State ex rel. v. Murphy, 130 Mo. l. c. 23; State ex rel. v. Murphy, 134 Mo. l. c. 575; Railroad v.

United Construction Co. v. City of St. Louis

334 Mo. 1006 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Mar 14, 1934

[Mullins v. Kansas City, 268 Mo. 444 , 188 S.W. 193 ; Leathers v. City of Springfield. 65 Mo. 504 : Likes v. City of Rolla. 184 Mo. App. 296 , 167 S.W. 645 : Burke v. City of Kansas. 34 Mo. App. 570 ; Wilson v. St. … Co. v. St. Louis, 284 Mo. 89 , 99, 109, 223 S.W. 931 ; Williams v. Chicago, S.F. C. Ry. Co., 112 Mo. 463 , 487, 494, 20 S.W. 631 ; Dinsmore v. Livingston County, 60 Mo. 241 .]

Mullins v. Mount St. Mary's Cemetery Ass'n

259 Mo. 142 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jun 23, 1914

That case was quoted in Windt v. German Reformed Church, 4 Sandf. 47Í. … St. 411; Perkins v. Lawrence, 138 Mass. 361 ; Sohier v. Trinity Church, 109 Mass. 1 ; Partridge v. Independent Church of Baltimore, 39 Md. 631 ; Richards v. Northwest Protestant Church, 32 Barb. 42 ; State v.

Williams v. State

437 S.W.2d 82 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Feb 10, 1969

State v. Brown, 306 Mo. 532 , 267 S.W. 864, 865 . And see State v. Zammar, Mo.Sup., 305 S.W.2d 441, 444 . … State v. Parker, Mo.Sup., 413 S.W.2d 489 .

Sallee v. St. Louis-San Francisco Railway Co.

321 Mo. 798 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Dec 31, 1928

Co. v. United States, 220 U.S. 559 , 575; Carter v. Railroad Co., 307 Mo. 595 , 605; McAllister v. St. Louis Merchants Bridge Terminal Ry. … [Jablonowski v. Mfg. Co., 312 Mo. 173 , 196; Powell v. Railroad Co., 255 Mo. 420 , 454; Laycock v. Railways Co., 290 Mo. 344 , 357; Sang v. St. Louis, 262 Mo. 454 , 463; Browning v.

State v. King

342 Mo. 975 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Aug 17, 1938

[State v. Cason, 252 S. W. 688 ; State v. Guye, 299 Mo. 348, 367 , 252 S. W. 955, 959 (5); State v. Cooper, 271 S. W. 471 , *988 474(7); State v. Hersh, 296 S. W. 433 , 436(11); State v. Baker, 318 Mo. 542, 547 , 300 S. … Then she said that in May, 1935, she was a day *990 p.upil and a little later that she was a boarding pupil.

State ex rel. City of St. Louis v. Public Service Commission

327 Mo. 318 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Mar 25, 1931

Railroad Co. v. State of Wisconsin, 238 U. S. 491, 501 ; Hewlett v. W. U. Tel. Co., 28 Fed. 181, 184 .] … Co. v. Pub. Serv. Comm. (Mo.), 233 S. W. 425 , 430; State ex rel. City of St. Joseph v. Busby et al. (Mo.), 274 S. W. 1067 , 1072.]

State v. Barrett

262 Mo. 165 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Nov 24, 1914

BROWN, J. … [State v. Concelia, 250 Mo. l. c. 424.] Record II.

Magner v. City of St. Louis

179 Mo. 495 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Feb 10, 1904

, and *500 may be removed by the Mayor for cause, or by the Commissioner and President of the Board of Public Improvements whenever the interests of the city require it.” … Knittel v. Longfellow, 93 Mo. App. 364 ; State ex rel. Bartraw v. Longfellow, 95 Mo. App. 660 ; State ex rel. Magner v. Longfellow, 95 Mo. App. 668 .]

St. Louis & San Francisco Railway Co. v. Lowder

138 Mo. 533 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Apr 3, 1897

Miller v. Brown, 3 Mo. 128 ; Higdon v. Conway, 12 Mo. 295 ; Melcher v. Scruggs, 72 Mo. 406 . … Hunt v. Hunt, 12 N. Y. 217; State ex rel. *537 Scott v. Smith, 104 Mo. 419 ; State ex rel. Railroad v. Neville, 110 Mo. 345 ; Musick v. Railroad, 114 Mo. 309 .

Bromschwig v. Carthage Marble & White Lime Co.

334 Mo. 319 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Dec 20, 1933

Bacon, 30 Fed. 538 ; Paducah, etc., Co. v. Hays (Ky.), 24 S. W. 237 ; Eden v. Rigsdales Co., 23 L. R. … Co. v.

Bagley v. City of St. Louis

268 Mo. 259 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jun 2, 1916

Bagley’s place for the Hamilton Brown Shoe Company. They were driving Bagley’s team and were to get a load of empty shoe boxes and return with them to Bagley’s. … [Rhoads v. C. & A. R. R. Co., 227 Ill. 328 ; C. & A. R. R. Co., v. Shannon, 43 Ill. 338 ; Burk v. Arcata & Mad River R. R. Co., 125 Cal. 364 ; Anderson v. C. B. & Q. Ry.

State v. Cochran

356 Mo. 778 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jul 14, 1947

Defendant says that no witness could be allowed to so testify because such an opinion would be an invasion of the province of the jury, citing State v. Brown, 181 Mo. 192 , l. c. 215, 79 S. W. 1111 ; and State v. … The McCann ease cited the Brown case and State v. Schlichter, 263 Mo. 561 , 173 S. W. 1072 , in which this question was asked a lay witness. [See also State v. Evans, 345 Mo. 398 , 133 S.

Kelly v. Thuey

143 Mo. 422 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Mar 29, 1898

Matthews v. Coalter, 9 Mo. 696, 702 ; Lubbering v. Kolilbrecher, 22 Mo. 596 ; McCormick v. Fitzmorris, 39 Mo. 24, 34 ; Paramore v. Lindsey, 63 Mo. 63, 66, 67 ; Holton v. Kemp, 81 Mo. 661 ; Stillwell v. … See, also, Grafton v. Cummings, 99 U. S. 100, 106 ; 8 Am. and Eng. Ency. of Law, 726; Browne, Stat. Frauds [5 Ed.], sec. 376; 1 Warvelle on Vendors, p. 105, sec. 10; Fry, Spec. Perf., sec. 335; Waterman, Spec.

Darby v. Henwood

346 Mo. 1204 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Dec 11, 1940

what was the matter with him; that he and Brown and a Mr. … [Lappin v.

Zahner v. City of Perryville

813 S.W.2d 855 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jul 23, 1991

Comm’n v. … Comm’n v.