Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersmo

10,000+ results

1.20s

  • Taney County v. Empire District Electric Company

    309 S.W.2d 610 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Feb 10, 1958

    Thereafter, the defendant appeared before the Taney County Board of Equalization and protested said assessment requesting that same be reduced to the true value of the property, which request was denied by said board. … Rogersville Reorganized School District v. Holmes, 363 Mo. 760 , 253 S.W.2d 402 ; Schlafly v. Baumann, 341 Mo. 755 , 108 S.W.2d 363 ; State ex inf. Gentry v. Lamar, 316 Mo. 721 , 291 S.W. 457 ; Mead v.

    Cited 16 timesPublished
  • Kuczma v. Droszkowski

    243 Mo. 57 · Supreme Court of Missouri · May 31, 1912

    [Hanks v. Hanks, 218 Mo. l. c. 676; Keaton v. Weber, 233 Mo. 691 .] … [Walther v. Null, 233 Mo. l. c. 110; Miller v. McCaleb, 208 Mo. 572 ; R. S. 1909, sec. 1972.] Some intimation of a different nature is contained in Bower v.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Bright v. Pike County

    69 Mo. 519 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Apr 15, 1879

    He was tried in Marion county on a change of venue, and the expense of boarding the petit jury was taxed as costs against Pike county by the circuit court of Marion. … The case of the State ex rel. v. Clark, State Auditor, 57 Mo. 25 , is decisive of this. It was there held *520 that there is do provision* of law for the payment of such expenses by the State.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Missouri Electric Power Co. v. Smith

    348 Mo. 738 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jul 25, 1941

    [Morrison v. … In the case of McNichols v.

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • Salvation Army v. Hoehn

    354 Mo. 107 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jun 4, 1945

    Koeln v. St. Louis Y.M.C.A. et al. (Div. 2-1914), 259 Mo. 233 , 168 S.W. 589 ; State ex rel. St. Louis Y.M.C.A. v. Gehner et al. (banc — 1928), 320 Mo. 1172 , 11 S.W.2d 30 ; St. Louis Y.M.C.A. v. Gehner et al. … See also, Fitterer v.

    Cited 67 timesPublished
  • Hendrick v. Chicago & Alton Railroad

    136 Mo. 548 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Dec 23, 1896

    Pittsburgh, etc., Railroad v. Krouse, 30 Ohio St. 222 . … Barker v. Railroad, 98 Mo. 50 .

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • State ex rel. Referendum Committee Regarding Ordinance 4639 v. Lasky

    932 S.W.2d 392 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Oct 16, 1996

    The Relator seeks to prohibit the enforcement of an order of Respondent to the board of election commissioners of St. … Woodmansee v. Ridge, 343 Mo. 702 , 123 S.W.2d 20 (1938). The Respondent was without authority to order the measure added to the ballot. The preliminary order is made absolute. All concur.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Fogle v. Pindell

    248 Mo. 65 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Feb 28, 1913

    BROWN, 0. This is a proceeding instituted by daughters of Michael M. … [James v. Groff, 157 Mo. 402 ; Johnston v. Johnston, 173 Mo. 91 ; Miller v. Slupsky, 158 Mo. 643 ; Rice v. Shipley, supra.]

    Cited 12 timesPublished
  • Koontz v. Hannibal Savings & Insurance

    42 Mo. 126 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jan 15, 1868

    In Loehner et al. v. Home Mutual Ins. … Co., 25 Barb. 497 , a contrary doctrine is held; and the case of Brown v. The People’s Mut. Ins. Co., 11 Cush *131 280, and other cases which we have examined in Massachusetts and Maine, are in conflict with it.

    Cited 30 timesPublished
  • Schell v. Leland

    45 Mo. 289 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jan 15, 1870

    (Bartlett v. McDaniel, 8 Mo. 40 ; Barnett v. Lynch, id. 261; Evans v. King, 7 Mo. 411 ; Griffin v. Samuel, 6 Mo. 50 ; Hembree v. Campbell, 8 Mo. 572 .) But the record does not sustain this assumption. … (Anderson v. Brown, 9 Mo. 688 ; Smith v. Rollins, 25 Mo. 408 ; Lincoln v. Hilbus, 86 Mo. 149 .) I think that the objection raised was fatal, and that the motion should have been therefore sustained.

    Cited 27 timesPublished
  • Bird v. Montgomery

    6 Mo. 510 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Sep 15, 1840

    The board of commissioners rejected this claim in 1811. … Strother v. Lucas, 12 Peter R. 44. New Orleans v. United States, 10 Peters R. 724, 730. A careful examination of the laws and usages of both these countries, led the supreme court of the U.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • State Ex Rel. Ludlow v. Guffey

    306 S.W.2d 552 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Nov 12, 1957

    Bank v. Board of Zoning Appeals, 281 N.Y. 534 , 24 N.E.2d 319 ; Larkin Co. v. Schwab, 242 N.Y. 330 , 151 N.E. 637 ; Small v. Moss, 279 N.Y. 288 , 18 N.E.2d 281 ; Kramer v. … Triangle Fuel Co. v.

    Cited 31 timesPublished
  • Walker v. City of Kansas

    99 Mo. 647 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Oct 15, 1889

    Bassett v. St. Joseph, 53 Mo. 290 ; Brown v. Glasgow, 57 Mo. 156 ; Craig v. Sedalia, 63 Mo. 417 ; Staples v. Town of Canton, 69 Mo. 592 ; Brennan v. City of St. Louis, 92 Mo. 482 ; Streeter v. … App. 244 ; Taubman v. City of Lexington, 25 Mo. App. 218 .

    Cited 25 timesPublished
  • Curators of Central College v. Shields

    354 Mo. 129 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jul 2, 1945

    Lossing v. Shull, 351 Mo. 342 , 173 S.W.2d 1 , 6. … Siemers v. St. Louis Elec. Term. R. Co., 348 Mo. 682 , 155 S.W.2d 130 , 136; Rude v. St.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • State v. Evans

    345 Mo. 398 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Nov 22, 1939

    [See State v. Schlichter, 263 Mo. 561 , 577, 173 S.W. 1072, 1077 ; State v. Palmer, 161 Mo. 152 , 174, 61 S.W. 651 ; State v. Brown, 181 Mo. 192 , 215, 79 S.W. 1111 .] … The Schlichter and Brown cases were cited by this court with approval in State v.

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Woodside v. Durham

    317 Mo. 15 · Supreme Court of Missouri · May 23, 1927

    The precise question was last involved (so far as we find) in the case of Brown v. Peak, 177 S.W. 645 , before this court in banc. … [Sec. 1882, R.S. 1909; Heinemann v. Bennett, 144 Mo. 113 ; Herbst v. Merrifield, 133 Mo. 267 ; Stevens v. Martin, 168 Mo. 407 ; Brown v. Hartford, 173 Mo. 183 ; Thompson v. Stilwell, 253 Mo. 89 .]"

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • Walker v. Bohannan

    243 Mo. 119 · Supreme Court of Missouri · May 31, 1912

    The more recent ones are: Forrister v. Sullivan, 231 Mo. 345 ; Collins v. Harrell, 219 Mo. 279 ; Wales v. *137 Holden, 209 Mo. 552 ; Kirk v. Middlebrook, 201 Mo. 245 . … This contract to board him was made in the light of the fact that he was blind. He had boarded him before, and knew full well the obligation he was assuming under the contract.

    Cited 79 timesPublished
  • City of St. Louis v. St. Louis, Iron Mountain & Southern Railway Co.

    248 Mo. 10 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Feb 28, 1913

    The out boundaries of the commons of Carondelet were determined by the General Government by an official and approved survey made in 1834, known as “Brown’s Survey.” [Dent v. Sigerson, 29 Mo. 489 .] … [St Louis v. Davidson, 102 Mo. 149 ; Mayor v. Sonneborn, 113 N. Y. 423 ; Bank v. Trust Co., 187 Mo. 494 .]

    Cited 13 timesPublished
  • Speed v. St. Louis Merchants Bridge Terminal Railway Co.

    163 Mo. 111 · Supreme Court of Missouri · May 21, 1901

    Blackburn, president of the board of aldermen of the council of the city of St. … Blackburn, named in said deed as president of the board of aldermen of the council of said city, has long since departed *120 this life; that no such office is known to the law as president of the board of aldermen of the

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • State Ex Rel. Klein v. Hughes

    351 Mo. 651 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jul 6, 1943

    Co. v. Shain, 340 Mo. 1195, 1203 (7), 105 S. … Dental Board, 348 Mo. 616, 623 (1), 155 S. W. (2d) 80, 83 (1).

    Cited 26 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.