Case law

Cook v. County of St. Francois

349 Mo. 484 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jun 3, 1942

Gen. v. Hedrick, 294 Mo. 21 , l. c. 64, 241 S. W. 402 . See also: State ex rel. Mincke v. *488 Sartorius, 231 Mo. App. 807 , l. c. 811, 95 S. W. (2d) 873 ; 15 C. J., sec. 123, p. 471.] … There was no proof that the State Board of Health made the finding and gave the authority to the county court provided in Section 9756, supra, nor was there any proof that a petition was filed as provided in Section 9758,

Bertche v. Equitable Loan & Investment Ass'n

147 Mo. 343 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Dec 23, 1898

To the same effect is Havens v. Ins. Co., 123 Mo. 416 ; Daggs v. Ins. Co., 136 Mo. 382 ; Reed v. Painter, 129 Mo. loc. cit. 680. In Wall v. Equitable Life Assur. Society, 32 Fed. … In the case of Latimer v.

Simonton v. St. Louis Transit Co.

207 Mo. 718 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Dec 10, 1907

The conclusions reached in the Allen case respecting the propriety of the instructions requested and refused, find support in the cases of Nugent v. Railroad, 73 Conn. 139 ; Flynn v. Railroad, 67 N. J. … Law 546; Moylan v. Railroad, 128 N. Y. 585 ; Ashbrook v. Railroad, 18 Mo. App. 290 . The issue as to contributory negligence of the plaintiff was sharply presented by the pleadings in this cause.

Evans v. Partlow

322 Mo. 11 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Mar 2, 1929

In Buford v. … In Russ v.

State ex rel. Merrell v. Carter

518 S.W.3d 798 · Supreme Court of Missouri · May 30, 2017

V, sec. 4. … Tipler v. Gardner, 506 S.W.3d 922 (Mo. banc 2017).

State Ex Rel., Pickett v. Truman

333 Mo. 1018 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Oct 19, 1933

The plaintiff was appointed city attorney by the village board for one year at a salary of $750. … Board of Commissioners, supra, the question was as to whether the clerk of the board of county commissioners was an officer, and it was held it was the members of the board wdio were clothed with the sovereign power of the

Cammann v. Edwards

340 Mo. 1 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Dec 14, 1936

K. but have since transferred account to Paul Brown and Company for good and sufficient reasons.”' … [Hale v. Gardiner, supra.]

State ex rel. Glenn v. Mississippi River Bridge Co.

109 Mo. 253 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Oct 15, 1891

The assessment by the state board of equalization and the levy by the county court of Pike county are not challenged for any irregularity. … Compare Railroad v. Williams (1890), 53 Ark. 58 ; Cass Co. v. Railroad (1889), 25 Neb. 318 ; Bridge Co. v. Adams Co. (1878), 88 Ill. 615 ; Railroad v. Devereux (1889), 11 Fed. Rep. 11; State v. Metz (1880), 29 N. J.

State v. King

342 Mo. 975 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Aug 17, 1938

[State v. Cason, 252 S. W. 688 ; State v. Guye, 299 Mo. 348, 367 , 252 S. W. 955, 959 (5); State v. Cooper, 271 S. W. 471 , *988 474(7); State v. Hersh, 296 S. W. 433 , 436(11); State v. Baker, 318 Mo. 542, 547 , 300 S. … Then she said that in May, 1935, she was a day *990 p.upil and a little later that she was a boarding pupil.

State v. Tiernan

223 Mo. 142 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Nov 23, 1909

It is identical in its charging parts with the information approved by this court in State v. … John Ellsperman, Jr., testified he was Secretary of the Board of Election Commissioners of the city of St.

Crenshaw v. City of Belle

571 S.W.2d 234 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Sep 12, 1978

State Highway Commission v. Meier, 388 S.W.2d 855, 860 (Mo. banc 1965); Wilson v. Kansas City, 162 S.W.2d 802 , 804 (Mo. 1942); Arcadia Realty Co. v. … App. 1953); Amitin v. Izard, 252 S.W.2d 635, 638 [3] (Mo.App. 1952); Christy v. Chicago, B. & Q.R. Co., 240 Mo.App. 632, 637 , 212 S.W.2d 476, 479 [4] (1948); Campbell v.

City of Carondelet v. McPherson

20 Mo. 192 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Oct 15, 1854

In Menard’s heirs v. … Now, taking the law to be clear, as laid down in Menard v.

State v. Wilson

436 S.W.2d 633 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Feb 10, 1969

State v. Stoner, Mo., 395 S.W.2d 192 ; State v. Walker, Mo., 365 S.W.2d 597 . … In State v.

Boehrer v. Thompson

359 Mo. 465 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jul 11, 1949

Brown v. Illinois Terminal Co., 319 Ill. 326 , 150 N. E. 242 ; Heidenreich v. Bremner, 260 Ill. 439 , 103 N. E. 275 ; Illinois Central R. Co. v. Leiner, 202 Ill. 624 , 67 N. E. 398 , 95 Am. St. Rep. 266 .” … Brown v. Illinois Terminal Co., 319 Ill. 326 , 150 N. E. 242 , 151 ALR 1 . And see Greene v. Noonan, 372 Ill. 286 , 23 N. E. (2d) 720.

State ex rel. Barker v. Assurance Co. of America

251 Mo. 278 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jun 28, 1913

Louis v. … A similar question came before the Supreme Court of Ohio in the case of State ex rel. v. Board of Supervisors, 70 Oh. St. 341.

Bromschwig v. Carthage Marble & White Lime Co.

334 Mo. 319 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Dec 20, 1933

Bacon, 30 Fed. 538 ; Paducah, etc., Co. v. Hays (Ky.), 24 S. W. 237 ; Eden v. Rigsdales Co., 23 L. R. … Co. v.

Warne v. Sorge

258 Mo. 162 · Supreme Court of Missouri · May 26, 1914

[Utter v. Sidman, 170 Mo. 284 , l. c. 294; Tindall v. Tindall, 167 Mo. l. c. 224; Williamson v. Brown, 195 Mo. 313 , l. c. 336; Howell v. Sherwood, 242 Mo. l. c. 536.] … [Walton v. Drumtra, 152 Mo. l. c. 497; Cross v. Hoch, 149 Mo. 325 , l. c. 338; Tisdale v. Prather, 210 Mo. l. c. 408; Cox v. Jones, 229 Mo. l. c. 62.]

Burger v. Boardman

254 Mo. 238 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jan 3, 1914

As pointed out in a like case (Eck v. … [Massey v. Young, 73 Mo. l. c. 271, 272; Conn. Mut. Life Ins. Co. v. Smith, 117 Mo. l. c. 292, 293; Taaffe v. Kelley, 110 Mo. l. c. 136, 137; Sensenderfer v. Kemp, 83 Mo. l. c. 588, 589.]

Grand Amusement Co. v. Palladium Amusement Co.

315 Mo. 907 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Oct 11, 1926

[Hannerty v. Theatre Co., 109 Mo. 297, 308 .] … [Wiley, v. Reaser, 103 S. E. (W. Va.) 362; Twin-Lick Oil Company v. Marbury, 23 U. S. (Law Ed.) 328.]

State v. Heath

221 Mo. 565 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jun 29, 1909

In State v. … [State v. Starr, 38 Mo. 271 ; State v. Branstetter, 65 Mo. 149 ; State v. Hill, 69 Mo. 451 ; State v. Elliott, 98 Mo. 150 ; State v.