Case law

Peck v. Chouteau

91 Mo. 138 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Oct 15, 1886

Sharpe v. Johnston, 76 Mo. 670 ; Van Sickle v. Brown, 68 Mo. 627 . … Justice Bradley in Campbell v. Brown, 2 Woods, 350 : “If attorneys cannot act and advise freely and without constant fear of being harassed by suits and actions at law, parties could not obtain their legal rights.”

State Ex Rel. Aquamsi Land Co. v. Hostetter

336 Mo. 391 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Feb 7, 1935

W. 682 ; Black v. Early, 208 Mo. 281, 303 , 106 S. W. 1014 ; State ex rel. Blair v. Center Creek Mining Co., 262 Mo. 490, 503 , 171 S. W. 356 ; State ex rel. General Motors v. Brown, 330 Mo. 220, 226 , 48 S. … W. 682 ; State v. Butler, 178 Mo. 272, 337 , 77 S. W. 560 ; State ex rel. Board of Education of St. Louis v. Nast, 209 Mo. 708, 722, 723 , 108 S. W. 563 ; Kavanaugh v. Gordon, 244 Mo. 695, 719 , 149 S.

Butler v. United Railways Co.

293 Mo. 259 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Mar 18, 1922

Co. v. Reynolds, 233 S.W. (Mo.) l.c. 22; Reeves v. Railroad, 251 Mo. l.c. 177-8; Pope v. Railroad, 242 Mo. l.c. 238-9, 240; Kinlen v. Railroad, 216 Mo. l.c. 164.] In Reeves v. Railroad, supra, Mrs. … V. In State ex rel. v.

State v. Hahn

316 Mo. 229 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Dec 20, 1926

In State v. Newland, 285 S. W. l. c. 401; State v. Strada, 274 S. W. 34 ; and in State v. Affronti, 292 Mo. l. c. 67, we approved informa-tions of like form to that under review. … [State v. Douglas, 278 S. W. l. c. 1027; State v. Hudspeth, 159 Mo. l. c. 200; Wendling v. Bowden, 252 Mo. l. c. 693; State v. Miller. 93 Mo. 269 ; Wright v. Kansas City, 187 Mo. 678 .]

Grider v. Dent

22 Mo. 490 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Mar 15, 1856

The case of Dodd v. Morris, (3 Camp. 519,) does not support the doctrine contended for by Greenleaf in his work on the *493 law of evidence. (2 vol. p. 476, § 579.) … In Magrath, widow, v. Browne, (Armstrong, McCartney & Ogle’s Rep. 134,) Brady, O.

Agee v. Agee's Administrator

22 Mo. 366 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jan 15, 1856

Cornwallis, 2 Vern. 465; Holmes v. Coghill, 7 Ves. 506; 12 Ves. 206; 2 Sug. on Powers, 172.) “Powers,” said Lord Chief Justice Wilmot, (Wilm. 23,) “ are never imperative. … In Brown v.

Kilroy v. City of St. Louis

242 Mo. 79 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Mar 29, 1912

[Wiggin v. St. … [Badgley v. St. Louis, 149 Mo. 122 .] In that case it was said that whilst the Constitution gave the city of St.

Morrison v. McCartney

30 Mo. 183 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Mar 15, 1860

(Little v. Phœnix Bank, 2 Hill, 425 .) The opinion of Judge Cowen, in Hawkes v. Anderson, 21 Wend. 372 , has not been sustained. … (Alexander v. Burchfield, 3 Scott, N. R. 558 ; Robinson v. Hawkeford, 9 Q. B. 52; Byles on Bills, 14, and note 2.)

Glenn v. County Court of Wright County

280 Mo. 637 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Oct 10, 1919

Co. v. Young, 96 Mo. 39 ; St. Louis v. Glasgow, 254 Mo. 262 .] … Brown and Ragland, CC., concur.

State v. Gaultney

242 Mo. 388 · Supreme Court of Missouri · May 9, 1912

[State v. Noeninger, 108 Mo. 166 .] … [State v. Conway, 241 Mo. 271 .]

Benjamin v. Metropolitan Street Railway Co.

245 Mo. 598 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Nov 14, 1912

[Donovan v. Railroad, 89 Mo. 147 ; Stone v. Hunt, 94 Mo. 475 .] And *614 the facts constituting the contributory negligence must be pleaded. [Harrison v. … Railroad, 181 Mo. l. c. 415; Montgomery v. Railroad, Id., 477; Sheperd v. Transit Co., 189 Mo. 362 ; and Zander v. Transit Co., 206 Mo. 445 .

State v. Harris

396 S.W.2d 585 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Nov 8, 1965

In discussing this statute in People v. … See State v. Howe, 287 Mo. 1 , 228 S.W. 477 ; State v. Johnson, 350 Mo. 928 , 169 S.W.2d 339 ; State v. Thursby, Mo., 245 S.W.2d 859 ; and State v. Armstead, Mo., 283 S.W.2d 577 .

Boylan v. The Steamboat Victory

40 Mo. 244 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Mar 15, 1867

Coal Co. v. St. Bt. Colona, 36 Mo. 446 . … And it has been laid down by high authority that “ no person can sue in the admiralty for work and labor done in port before the voyage begins, or for necessaries so Id for the ship’s use before she sails ”—2 Brown’s Civ.

State v. McGee

473 S.W.2d 686 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Dec 13, 1971

State v. Young, Mo., 427 S.W.2d 510 . … Frank v. State, Fla.App., 199 So.2d 117 ; Petty v. People, Colo., 447 P.2d 217 , and, a case tried by the court, Markman v. State, Fla. App., 210 So.2d 486 .

Mahopaulos v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co.

256 Mo. 249 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Mar 24, 1914

. *253 [Thomas v. Elliott, 215 Mo. 598, 602 ; State ex rel. v. Broaddus, 216 Mo. 336, 342 .] … Brown and Baris, JJ., concur.

Reeves v. Thompson

357 Mo. 847 · Supreme Court of Missouri · May 10, 1948

He might have been so carried if he tried to get on the train, and defendant made inquiry about that, but plaintiff denied that he attempted to board the train. … Calvert and the man Mahin, whether or not the claim agent said, `I want you boys to remember and get that train on the crossing in your testimony', and if the man in the brown suit, Mr. Mahin, said ok? A. Yes, sir."

Vantine v. Butler

250 Mo. 445 · Supreme Court of Missouri · May 31, 1913

[Rodney v. Gibbs, 184 Mo. l. c. 11; Burgess v. O’Donoghue, 90 Mo. 299 ; Ritter v. Democratic Press Co., 68 Mo. 458 ; Railroad v. Atkinson, 17 Mo. App. 484 .] … [Spratt v. Lawson, 176 Mo. l. c. 182; Robertson v. Brown, 187 Mo. l. c. 457.]

Wilkerson v. Allen

67 Mo. 502 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Apr 15, 1878

Brown, also a witness for defendant, testified that James G. … McVey v. McVey, 51 Mo. 406 ; Rugle v. Webster, 55 Mo. 247 . In Garner v. Tucker, 61 Mo. 481 , the order approving the sale was made after the final settlement.

State v. Davis

117 Mo. 614 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Nov 9, 1893

In the case of State v. Bragg, 51 Mo. App. 334 , it was held by the St. … So it was held by this court in Ex Parte Brown, 72 Mo. 83 , that a subpoena duces tecum to compel the production of telegraphic dispatches should give a reasonably accurate description of the papers wanted either by date,

Wulfing v. Armstrong Cork Co.

250 Mo. 723 · Supreme Court of Missouri · May 31, 1913

[Austin v. Loring, 63 Mo. 22 ; Clyburn v. McLaughlin, 106 Mo. 521 ; Hartman v. Hornsby, 142 Mo. 368 ; Ansonia v. Cooper, 66 *735 Conn. 184 ; same case, 64 Conn. 536 ; 21 Smith’s Leading Cases (5 Am. Ed.), 662.] … PEE’ CURIAM. — The foregoing opinion of Brown, C., is adopted as the opinion of the court. All the judges concur.