Case law

Dausch v. Crane

109 Mo. 323 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Oct 15, 1891

Silliman v. United States, 101 U. S. 465 . We are cited to Davis v. … Schultz v. Arnot, 33 Mo. 172 ; Bank v. Clavin, 60 Mo. 559 ; Farrar v. Heinrich, 86 Mo. 532 .

Tillis v. City of Branson

945 S.W.2d 447 · Supreme Court of Missouri · May 27, 1997

Brown v. Hamid, 856 S.W.2d 51, 53 (Mo. banc 1993). 3 . Mo. Const. Art. Ill, sec. 40(30). 4 . Harris v. Missouri Gaming Comm’n, 869 S.W.2d 58, 65 (Mo. banc 1994) (citations omitted). 5 . Id.; State ex rel. … See Walters v. City of St.

Heman v. Britton

88 Mo. 549 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Oct 15, 1885

On the same day and at the same meeting, the board made another order, or resolution, reciting the indemnity bond, and to save the said securities thereon from loss, ordered that eleven of the bonds of one thousand dollars … Gill v. Balis, 72 Mo. 424 ; Bartlett v. Drew, 57 N. Y. 587 ; Hastings v. Drew, 76 N. Y. 9 ; Sawyer v. *556 Hoag, 17 Wall. 610 .

Zumwalt v. Forbis

349 Mo. 752 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jun 3, 1942

In McFarland v. Brown (Mo.), 193 S. W. 800 , this Court declared: “It is claimed by respondents [plaintiffs] that there was no evidence of delivery of the deed. … [Scott v. Scott, 95 Mo. 300 , 8 S. W. 161 ; Pitts v. Sheriff, 108 Mo. 110 , 18 S. W. 1071 .] ” Appellants' cite for the first time Tyler v. Hall, 106 Mo. 313 , 17 S. W. 319 .

State Ex Rel. Cason v. Bond

495 S.W.2d 385 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jun 6, 1973

Jones v. … This fact was recognized by this Court in the case of Brown v.

State v. Davis

117 Mo. 614 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Nov 9, 1893

In the case of State v. Bragg, 51 Mo. App. 334 , it was held by the St. … So it was held by this court in Ex Parte Brown, 72 Mo. 83 , that a subpoena duces tecum to compel the production of telegraphic dispatches should give a reasonably accurate description of the papers wanted either by date,

City of St. Louis v. Schulenburg & Boeckler Lumber Co.

98 Mo. 613 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Oct 15, 1889

Kimmel v. Benna, 70 Mo. 52 ; Ekey v. Inge, 87 Mo. 493 ; Avery v. Fitzgerald, 94 Mo. 207 . … That section was repealed in 1857, and this court, in Blevin v. Brown, 32 Mo. 176 , concluded this legislation placed a judgment in an ejectment suit on its early footing.

Wilson v. Purl

133 Mo. 367 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Mar 17, 1896

the lines Brown showed him; that he claimed the land under the quitclaim deed from Clark and Brown.” … Cook v. Farrah (1891) 105 Mo. 492 ; Allen v. Mansfield (1891) 108 Mo. 343 . The deed was admissible as color, at least. 2.

St. John's Mercy Hospital v. Leachman

552 S.W.2d 723 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jul 11, 1977

On receipt of the assessment notice, respondent, petitioned the Board of Equalization requesting an exemption for the Doctors’ Building and following the Board’s denial of that petition, pursued three separate courses of … In Jackson County v.

State v. Buxton

324 Mo. 78 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Dec 11, 1929

In State v. … In State v.

City of St. Louis v. Lanigan

97 Mo. 175 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Oct 15, 1888

Railroad v. Richardson, 45 Mo. 466 ; Railroad v. Campbell, 62 Mo. 585 . … Papin v. Massey, 27 Mo. 445 ; Mead v. Brown, 65 Mo. 552 .

Schneider v. Kloepple

270 Mo. 389 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Mar 16, 1917

In Lilly v. … In Van Nostrand v. Board of Domestic Missions, 59 N. J. Eq. 19, a bequest was made to the Domestic Missionary Society. This was claimed by the Board of Domestic Missions of the Reformed Church.

St. Louis County v. City of Florissant

406 S.W.2d 281 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jul 11, 1966

The first is that in McConnell v. … Kansas City v.

State v. Rader

262 Mo. 117 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Nov 24, 1914

I worked my grey horse and his brown horse after this feed.” … J., concurs in separate opinion; Brown, J., concurs in result. WALKER, P. J.

Franklin v. Hume Consolidated School District

271 Mo. 585 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jul 16, 1917

[Hehl v. Guion, 155 Mo. 76 .] … [Board of Education v. City of Winchester, 120 Ky. 591 ; City of Marion v. Haynes, 164 S. W. (Ky.) 79; Fowler v. City of Oakdale, 166 S. W. (Ky.) 195.] In Fox v. City of Seattle, 86 Pac.

State ex rel. Mispagel v. Angert

127 Mo. 456 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Mar 12, 1895

[said] board of supervisors shall have, by resolution, ordered the assessment of a tax, the secretary of the board, under the seal of the district, shall cause a certified copy of said order to be transmitted to the clerk … City of Clinton to use v. Henry Co., 115 Mo. 557 , and cases cited. This has been the settled law in this state *463 ever since the decision in Neenan v. Smith, 50 Mo. 526 , decided in 1872, and St. Louis to use v.

Butler v. United Railways Co.

293 Mo. 259 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Mar 18, 1922

Co. v. Reynolds, 233 S.W. (Mo.) l.c. 22; Reeves v. Railroad, 251 Mo. l.c. 177-8; Pope v. Railroad, 242 Mo. l.c. 238-9, 240; Kinlen v. Railroad, 216 Mo. l.c. 164.] In Reeves v. Railroad, supra, Mrs. … V. In State ex rel. v.

Heinz v. Railroad Transfer Co.

82 Mo. 233 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Apr 15, 1884

D'Aquila v. Lambert, 2 Edw. 77 S. C. … Buckley v. Furniss, 15 Wend. 137 ; Covell v. Hitchcock, 23 Wend. 611 ; Edwards v. Buwer, 2 N. & W. 375.

State Ex Rel. Aquamsi Land Co. v. Hostetter

336 Mo. 391 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Feb 7, 1935

W. 682 ; Black v. Early, 208 Mo. 281, 303 , 106 S. W. 1014 ; State ex rel. Blair v. Center Creek Mining Co., 262 Mo. 490, 503 , 171 S. W. 356 ; State ex rel. General Motors v. Brown, 330 Mo. 220, 226 , 48 S. … W. 682 ; State v. Butler, 178 Mo. 272, 337 , 77 S. W. 560 ; State ex rel. Board of Education of St. Louis v. Nast, 209 Mo. 708, 722, 723 , 108 S. W. 563 ; Kavanaugh v. Gordon, 244 Mo. 695, 719 , 149 S.

Wilkerson v. Allen

67 Mo. 502 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Apr 15, 1878

Brown, also a witness for defendant, testified that James G. … McVey v. McVey, 51 Mo. 406 ; Rugle v. Webster, 55 Mo. 247 . In Garner v. Tucker, 61 Mo. 481 , the order approving the sale was made after the final settlement.