Case law

Schellert v. State

569 S.W.2d 735 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Sep 12, 1978

State v. Hovis, 353 Mo. 602 , 183 S.W.2d 147, 148 (1944); State v. Cochran, 332 Mo. 742 , 60 S.W.2d 1, 2 (1933); see Brown v. State, 485 S.W.2d 424, 429 (Mo.1972); State v. Rose, 440 S.W.2d 441, 443 (Mo.1969); State v. … To the extent that Brown v. State, 485 S.W.2d 424 (Mo.1972) differs with the rule hereinbefore announced, it is no longer to be followed.

Davidson v. Schmidt

256 Mo. 18 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Mar 3, 1914

BROWN, C. … This case has been followed in State ex rel. v. Hopkins, supra; Pleasant Hill v. Dasher, supra; Lackland v. Walker, 151 Mo. 210 ; St. Louis v. Hollrah, 175 Mo. 79 .

State ex rel. Brumbaugh v. Kansas City, St. Joseph & Council Bluffs Railroad

149 Mo. 635 · Supreme Court of Missouri · May 23, 1899

[City of Kansas v. Railroad, 81 Mo. 285 .] In the case of Railroad v. … [Carondelet to use v. Picot, 38 Mo. loc. cit. 130; State ex rel. v. Shortridge, 56 Mo. 126 ; State ex rel. v. Railroad, 87 Mo. 236 .]

Holtzclaw v. Duff

27 Mo. 392 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Oct 15, 1858

Assuming, however, that they were common carriers, the fair construction of the contract is that they undertook to carry the hemp safely to the terminus of the railroad, and there to deliver it on board of a steamboat to … This principle has a familiar illustration in the leading case of Garside v. Treat & Mersey Nav. Co., 4 Term R. 581.

Blandy v. Asher

72 Mo. 27 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Apr 15, 1880

Brown v. Brown, 68 Mo. 396 . It is said, however, in the opinion of the majority, that the statute makes no distinction between an “ abandoned wife” and a “divorced wife.” … Dobson v. Butler, 17 Mo. 87 . Such a person, therefore, cannot claim the benefit of the provisions made by the homestead law for wives and widows. The position is also impliedly assumed, that as the statute gave Mrs.

State ex rel. Glenn v. Mississippi River Bridge Co.

134 Mo. 321 · Supreme Court of Missouri · May 26, 1896

Railroad v. People ex rel. … Since the bridge company, as against the defendant railroad company, under the ruling in the case of State ex rel. v.

City of St. Louis v. State Tax Commission

524 S.W.2d 839 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jul 14, 1975

Attention is called to the early case of The State v. … Koeln v. St. Louis Y.M.C.A., 259 Mo. 233 , 168 S.W. 589 (1914); State ex rel. St. Louis Y.M.C.A. v. Gehner, 320 Mo. 1172 , 11 S.W.2d 30 (1930), and St. Louis Y.M.C.A. v.

McAlister v. Pritchard

287 Mo. 494 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Apr 9, 1921

[Wimpey v. Ledford, 177 S.W. 302 ; Hudspeth v. Grumke, 214 *Page 499 499 S.W. 865 .] This intention should not be defeated simply because it was awkwardly expressed by an unlearned scrivener. … Small and Brown, CC., concur.

Keim v. Home Mutual Fire & Marine Insurance

42 Mo. 38 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Oct 15, 1867

S.) 390; Hollock v. Com. Ins. Co., 2 Dutch. 268; 3 Dutch. 645. … Ct. 280; Wilson v. Ætna Ins. Co., 27 Vt. 99 ; Brown v. Roger Williams Ins. Co., 5 R. I. 394; Amesbury v. Bowditch Ins. Co., 6 Gray, 596 ; Fullam v. N. Y. Ins. Co. 7 id. 61.

State v. Weatherby

344 Mo. 848 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jun 14, 1939

Cas. 345, 348; Commonwealth v. Bacon, 33 Ky. Law. Rep. 935, 111 S. W. 387 , 390; Ellis v. Board of State Auditors, 107 Mich. 528, 536 , 65 N. W. 577, 579 ; People v. Journal Co., 213 N. Y. 1, 7 , 106 N. … E. 759, 761 (6); Worth v. Stewart, 122 N. C. 258 , 29 S. E. 579 ; State v. Brown, 10 Ore. 215, 219 ; Emery v. United States, 13 Fed. (2d) 658(2).] State v. Thompson, 337 Mo. l. c. 336(3), 85 S.

Mayhew v. Todisman

246 Mo. 288 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Nov 30, 1912

[Clark v. Lewis, 215 Mo. 173 , 187-188 and cases cited.] … [Carter v. Dilley, 167 Mo. 564 .] The judgment of the Barry County Circuit Court is therefore reversed. PEN CURIAM. The foregoing opinion of BROWN, C., is adopted as the opinion of the court. All the Judges concur.

Rankin v. Harper

23 Mo. 579 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Oct 15, 1856

This is a new question here to some extent, although somewhat involved in the case of Howe & Wallace v. … (Per Brown, C. J., in Wait v. Day, 4 Denio, 442 .)

State v. Clinkenbeard

232 Mo. 539 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Feb 14, 1911

[State v. Pritchett, 219 Mo. 696 ; State v. Fraser, 220. Mo. 34; State v. Kile, 231 Mo. 50 ; State v. Carson, 231 Mo. 1 .] … Ferriss and Brown, JJ., concur.

Peterson v. Chicago & Alton Railway Co.

265 Mo. 462 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jun 30, 1915

Co., 202 Mo. 637 ; Rinehart v. Railway, 204 Mo. l. c. 276; Vincent v. Means, 184 Mo. l. c. 340-341; Bryan v. Wear, 4 Mo. 106 ; Vaulx v. Campbell, 8 Mo; 224; Wolff v. Campbell, 110 Mo. 114 ; Randle v. … V.

Kirby v. Nolte

349 Mo. 1015 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jul 25, 1942

He is an elective officer, a member of the Board of Estimates and Apportionment, and sits with the Board of Aldermen without a vote. Under See. 2, Art. … Rupp v.

State ex rel. Hospes v. Branch

112 Mo. 661 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Dec 13, 1892

In Tittman v. … Holmes, 41 Mich. 661 ; Powell v. Powell, 52 Mich. 432 ; Brown v. Bank, 148 Mass. 300 . In Brown v.

Springer v. Kleinsorge

83 Mo. 152 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Oct 15, 1884

This is all the law requires in the matter of description, ' Browne Stat. of Fr., § -385; Long v. *158 Wagoner, 47 Mo. 178 ; Tetherow v. Anderson, 63 Mo. 96 ; Briggs v. Munchon, 56 Mo. 467 . … Browne Stat. of Fr., § 351; McComb v. Wright, 4 John. Ch. 659; Gill v. Bicknell, 2 Cush. 358 ; Gill v. Hewitt, 7 Bush (Ky.) 10 ; Tatem v. Holliday, 59 Mo. 422 ; Barclay v. Bates, 2 Mo. App. 139 . III.

Iron County v. State Tax Commission

480 S.W.2d 65 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Apr 18, 1972

Louis County Water Co. v. … To repeat Judge Hyde’s statement in Michler v.

Meadow Park Land Co. v. School District

301 Mo. 688 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Dec 31, 1923

Co. v. Clark, 121 Mo. 169 ; Boyce v. Mo. Pac. Ry. Co., 168 Mo. 583 .] … Louis v.

Ramsey v. Thompson Manufacturing Co.

116 Mo. 313 · Supreme Court of Missouri · May 30, 1893

Insurance Co. v. Floyd, 74 Mo. 286 ; Gill v. Balis, 72 Mo. 424 ; Upton v. Tribilcock, 91 U. S. 45 . … See also Ruggles v. Brock, 6 Hun 164 ; Saffold v. Barnes, *331 39 Miss. 399 ; Duffield v. Iron Works, 31 N. W. Rep. 310 ; Chubb v. Upton, 95 U. S, 665; Upton v. Tribilcock, 91 U.