Case law

Rookstool v. Neaf

377 S.W.2d 402 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Apr 13, 1964

Nor do we, under our statute of frauds, subscribe to the rule in Brown v. … We note also from the facts in Brown v.

State Ex Rel. Melvin v. Hackmann

295 Mo. 14 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jun 24, 1922

The relators constitute the board of commissioners of the district. … necessary grading, bridging and drainage be done; so that the same when completed will be a permanent improvement of said public road; and that the cost of said improvement be made payable in fifteen annual installments. v

Kirby v. Nolte

349 Mo. 1015 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jul 25, 1942

He is an elective officer, a member of the Board of Estimates and Apportionment, and sits with the Board of Aldermen without a vote. Under See. 2, Art. … Rupp v.

Douglass v. Safire

712 S.W.2d 373 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jun 17, 1986

See Skadal v. … Scott v. Davis, 684 S.W.2d 872 (Mo.App.1984); Stroud v. Govreau, 495 S.W.2d 682 (Mo.App. 1973).

State Ex Rel. Wagner v. Farm & Home Savings & Loan Ass'n

338 Mo. 313 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jan 4, 1936

Moberly v. Sevier, Judge, 337 Mo. 1174 , 88 S. W. (2d) 154 .] … In the case of Fornataro v.

State v. Wren

333 Mo. 575 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Aug 12, 1933

State (Ark.), 179 S.W. 818 ; Pickens v. State (Tex.Crim. App.), 180 S.W. 234 : Jules v. State (Md.), 36 A. 1027 ; Commonwealth v. Howard, 24 Pa. Dist. Ct. 1075; People v. Winslow, 39 Mich. 505 ; note to Barton v. … [Lamkin v. State (Tex. Cr. App.), 260 S.W. 567 .] In Lawson v.

Meyers v. Watson

234 Mo. 286 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Apr 11, 1911

[Thomas v. Black, 113 Mo. l. c. 69; Pounds v. Dale, 48 Mo. 270 ; Bradley v. Bradley, 24 Mo. 311 .] … J., and Brown, J., concur.

State ex rel. Walker v. Dobson

135 Mo. 1 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jun 16, 1896

, *13 297, 196, 246, 87, 236, 363, 73, and cases cited; Brown, Jurisdict., sec. 104. … Brown, Jurisdict., sec. 1.

State v. Ashcraft

342 Mo. 608 · Supreme Court of Missouri · May 3, 1938

W. 947, 949 ; State ex rel. v. Cox, 298 Mo. 427, 435 , 250 S. W. 551, 553 ; Layton v. Chinberg (Mo. Div. 2), 282 S. W. 434 , 436; State v. Capps, 311 Mo. 683, 698 , 278 S. W. 695, 699 ; State ex rel. City of Macon v. … J., sec. 6, p. 1010; State v. Helms, 179 Mo. 280, 285 , 78 S. W. 592, 594 ; State v. Woods, 137 Mo. 6, 10 , 38 S. W. 722, 723 .]

Simmons v. Friday

359 Mo. 812 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Sep 12, 1949

Co. v. Hill, 281 U.S. 673 , 679, 50 S.Ct. 451 , 74 L.Ed. 1107 . We think not. … Ludwig v. Scott (Mo.), 65 S.W.2d 1034 , 1035[1]; Rogers v. Brown, 61 Mo. 187 .

Producers Produce Co. v. Industrial Commission of Missouri Division of Employment Security

365 Mo. 996 · Supreme Court of Missouri · May 14, 1956

Holland Bank v. Republic Nat. Bank, 328 Mo. 577 , 41 S.W. 2d 815, 820 ; Brown v. Moore (Mo. Sup.), 248 S.W. 2d 553, 556 . … Jacobs v. Unemployment Comp. & Placement, 27 Wash. 641 , 179 Pac. 2d 707, 713 (6); Leonard v. Unemployment Comp. Board of Review (Ohio) 75 N.E. 2d 567, 568 .

State Ex Rel. Missouri Highway & Transportation Commission v. Dierker

961 S.W.2d 58 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Feb 24, 1998

Board of Trustees v. Russell, 843 S.W.2d 353, 355 (Mo. banc 1992). … The facts of this case parallel those in Dale by and Through Dale v. Edmonds, 819 S.W.2d 388 (Mo.App.1991), where sovereign immunity protected a school board from suit for a student’s injuries.

Hill v. Miller

36 Mo. 182 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Aug 15, 1865

(Lewis v. Lewis, 9 Mo. 182 .) In Perry v. … Another board was subsequently appointed by act of Congress who were authorized and required to examine claims of this description. Testimony was taken before the board in relation to it.

Kahn v. Bank of St. Joseph

70 Mo. 262 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Oct 15, 1879

Co. v. Goodfellow, 9 Mo. 150 . They were held to be reasonable and not inconsistent with our general laws concerning personal property, whether such debts wore due or not. … Co. v. Clark and Thaw, reported in 5 Casey 150.

Miller v. Medley

236 Mo. 694 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jul 15, 1911

[Howard v. Brown, 197 Mo. l. c. 46, and cases cited; Nolan v. Taylor, 131 Mo. 229 .] So far as the first name is concerned, however, the law, as heretofore held by this court, requires strict accuracy. [Ohlmann v. … J., concurs; Brown, J., not sitting..

Mayhew v. Todisman

246 Mo. 288 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Nov 30, 1912

[Clark v. Lewis, 215 Mo. 173 , 187-188 and cases cited.] … [Carter v. Dilley, 167 Mo. 564 .] The judgment of the Barry County Circuit Court is therefore reversed. PEN CURIAM. The foregoing opinion of BROWN, C., is adopted as the opinion of the court. All the Judges concur.

Heins Implement Co. v. Missouri Highway & Transportation Commission

859 S.W.2d 681 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Aug 17, 1993

Indian River Cty., 371 So.2d 1010, 1016 (Fla.1979); Schear v. Board of County Comm’rs of Bernalillo County, 101 N.M. 671, 673-74 , 687 P.2d 728, 730-31 (1984); Brennen v. … Wilson v. Ramacher, 352 N.W.2d 389, 394 (Minn.1984); Board of Transp. v. Terminal Warehouse Corp., 300 N.C. 700 , 268 S.E.2d 180, 183 (1980).

State ex rel. Hospes v. Branch

112 Mo. 661 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Dec 13, 1892

In Tittman v. … Holmes, 41 Mich. 661 ; Powell v. Powell, 52 Mich. 432 ; Brown v. Bank, 148 Mass. 300 . In Brown v.

State v. Northup

367 S.W.2d 512 · Supreme Court of Missouri · May 13, 1963

The Board of Aldermen of said city, proceeding under said sections, by motion duly made and seconded, declared and determined that respondent was the elected alderman of said Ward 4. … Adams v. Richardson, Mo., 337 S.W.2d 911, 915 [1]; Olson v.

January v. Marler

274 Mo. 543 · Supreme Court of Missouri · May 17, 1918

BROWN, C. … “It is not necessary that he shall be a father or a husband.'’ ’ [Grocery Co. v. Monroe, 142 Mo. I. c. 170; Broyles v. Cox, 153 Mo. 242, 248 ; Bank v. Guthrey, 127 Mo. 189 ; Brown v.