Case law

Holtzclaw v. Duff

27 Mo. 392 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Oct 15, 1858

Assuming, however, that they were common carriers, the fair construction of the contract is that they undertook to carry the hemp safely to the terminus of the railroad, and there to deliver it on board of a steamboat to … This principle has a familiar illustration in the leading case of Garside v. Treat & Mersey Nav. Co., 4 Term R. 581.

State v. Ashcraft

342 Mo. 608 · Supreme Court of Missouri · May 3, 1938

W. 947, 949 ; State ex rel. v. Cox, 298 Mo. 427, 435 , 250 S. W. 551, 553 ; Layton v. Chinberg (Mo. Div. 2), 282 S. W. 434 , 436; State v. Capps, 311 Mo. 683, 698 , 278 S. W. 695, 699 ; State ex rel. City of Macon v. … J., sec. 6, p. 1010; State v. Helms, 179 Mo. 280, 285 , 78 S. W. 592, 594 ; State v. Woods, 137 Mo. 6, 10 , 38 S. W. 722, 723 .]

State v. Wren

333 Mo. 575 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Aug 12, 1933

State (Ark.), 179 S.W. 818 ; Pickens v. State (Tex.Crim. App.), 180 S.W. 234 : Jules v. State (Md.), 36 A. 1027 ; Commonwealth v. Howard, 24 Pa. Dist. Ct. 1075; People v. Winslow, 39 Mich. 505 ; note to Barton v. … [Lamkin v. State (Tex. Cr. App.), 260 S.W. 567 .] In Lawson v.

Kirby v. Nolte

349 Mo. 1015 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jul 25, 1942

He is an elective officer, a member of the Board of Estimates and Apportionment, and sits with the Board of Aldermen without a vote. Under See. 2, Art. … Rupp v.

D'Oench v. Gillioz

346 Mo. 179 · Supreme Court of Missouri · May 7, 1940

[See Caldwell v. Eubanks, 326 Mo. 185 , 30 S.W.2d 976 .] … [We also ruled a similar situation in Moberly v. Leonard, 339 Mo. 791 , 99 S.W.2d 58 ; see also Sturdivant Bank v. Houck (Mo. App.), 47 S.W.2d 135 .]

State Ex Rel. Missouri Highway & Transportation Commission v. Dierker

961 S.W.2d 58 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Feb 24, 1998

Board of Trustees v. Russell, 843 S.W.2d 353, 355 (Mo. banc 1992). … The facts of this case parallel those in Dale by and Through Dale v. Edmonds, 819 S.W.2d 388 (Mo.App.1991), where sovereign immunity protected a school board from suit for a student’s injuries.

Broyles v. Cox

153 Mo. 242 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Dec 22, 1899

[State to use v. Kane, 42 Mo. App. 253 ; Wade v. Jones, 20 Mo. 75 ; Duncan v. Frank, 8 Mo. App. 286 .] A married man is the head of a family, even when his wife has left him and he has no children. [Brown v. … Brown, 68 Mo. 388 ; Whitehead v. Tapp, 69 Mo. 415 .] So, too, if he lives on the land with his two children, who are of age and work for him without wages and look up to him as such. [Bank of Versailles v.

State Ex Rel. Breshears v. Missouri State Employees' Retirement System

362 S.W.2d 571 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Dec 11, 1962

Louis County v. Neaf, Banc, 344 Mo. 905 , 130 S.W.2d 509 . Respondent Board objects that the active members are not parties. … Louis v.

Douglass v. Safire

712 S.W.2d 373 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jun 17, 1986

See Skadal v. … Scott v. Davis, 684 S.W.2d 872 (Mo.App.1984); Stroud v. Govreau, 495 S.W.2d 682 (Mo.App. 1973).

Kansas City v. Ward

134 Mo. 172 · Supreme Court of Missouri · May 5, 1896

Quill v. Indianapolis, 124 Ind. 292 ; Faller v. Heath, 89 Ill. 296 ; Fletcher v. Oshkosh, 18 Wis. 228 ; Silkman v. Milwaukee, 31 Wis. 555 ; 1 Dillon on Mun. Corp. [4 Ed.], sec. 482. … Kiley v. St. Joseph, 67 Mo. 491 ; Saxton v. St. Joseph, 60 Mo. 153 . 5.

Chamberlain v. Thompson

256 S.W.2d 779 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Mar 9, 1953

Knorp v. Thompson, 357 Mo. 1062 , 212 S.W.2d 584, 588 , 5 A.L.R. 2d 103 ; Willsie v. Thompson, 359 Mo. 775 , 223 S.W.2d 458 ; Graves v. Atchison, T. & S. F. Ry. Co., 360 Mo. 167 , 227 S.W.2d 660 ; Toeneboehn v. St. … Co., supra; Stotler v. Chicago & A. R. Co., 200 Mo. 107 , 98 S.W. 509 ; Dodd v. Terminal R. Ass'n of St. Louis, Mo.App., 108 S.W.2d 982 ; Connole v. Illinois Cent. R.

State Ex Rel. Chicago Great Western Railroad v. Public Service Commission

330 Mo. 729 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jun 10, 1932

Henson v. Brown, 326 Mo. 230 , 31 S. … Jenkins v. Brown, 323 Mo. l. c. 386, 19 S. W. (2d) 484 .] III.

State v. Gates

471 S.W.2d 272 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Oct 11, 1971

In State v. Walters, Mo., 457 S.W.2d 817 , this court ruled that the cases of United States v. Wade, 388 U.S. 218 , 87 S.Ct. 1926 , 18 L.Ed.2d 1149 , and Gilbert v. … The authority for this instruction is found in State v. Brown, Mo., 443 S.W.2d 805 . The judgment is affirmed. BARRETT and PRITCHARD, CC., concur.

Kahn v. Bank of St. Joseph

70 Mo. 262 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Oct 15, 1879

Co. v. Goodfellow, 9 Mo. 150 . They were held to be reasonable and not inconsistent with our general laws concerning personal property, whether such debts wore due or not. … Co. v. Clark and Thaw, reported in 5 Casey 150.

Householder v. City of Kansas

83 Mo. 488 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Oct 15, 1884

The case of Fusz v. … Va. 402 ; in Blanchard v.

Hill v. Miller

36 Mo. 182 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Aug 15, 1865

(Lewis v. Lewis, 9 Mo. 182 .) In Perry v. … Another board was subsequently appointed by act of Congress who were authorized and required to examine claims of this description. Testimony was taken before the board in relation to it.

Mayhew v. Todisman

246 Mo. 288 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Nov 30, 1912

[Clark v. Lewis, 215 Mo. 173 , 187-188 and cases cited.] … [Carter v. Dilley, 167 Mo. 564 .] The judgment of the Barry County Circuit Court is therefore reversed. PEN CURIAM. The foregoing opinion of BROWN, C., is adopted as the opinion of the court. All the Judges concur.

Rookstool v. Neaf

377 S.W.2d 402 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Apr 13, 1964

Nor do we, under our statute of frauds, subscribe to the rule in Brown v. … We note also from the facts in Brown v.

State v. Saak

269 Mo. 231 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Dec 6, 1916

■ of Health, as provided in this article, or after the revocation of - such license by the State Board of Health, as provided in this article, shall be deemed guilty of a misdemeanor, and punished by a fine of not less than … Nieuhaus, 217 Mo. 232 ; State v.

Ballentine v. Nester

350 Mo. 58 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Aug 6, 1942

Section 6540, supra, prescribes the powers and duties of the Board of Health in cities of the first class. … See State v. Tower, 185 Mo. 79 . In Nelson v. City of Minneapolis, 127 N.