Case law

Wood v. Steamboat Fleetwood

22 Mo. 560 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Mar 15, 1856

seems to be, that such circumstances as would lead a court of equity to set aside a contract, such as fraud, mistake or surprise, may be shown at law to destroy the effect of a receiptand this principle was acted upon in Brown … v.

Ballinger v. Gascosage Electric Cooperative

788 S.W.2d 506 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Apr 17, 1990

Brown and Mr. … Halford v. Yandell, 558 S.W.2d 400, 411-412 (Mo.App.1977).

Greenbriar Hills Country Club v. Director of Revenue

47 S.W.3d 346 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Mar 20, 2001

Gehrs v. Director of Revenue, 965 S.W.2d 360, 362 (Mo.App.1998). See also Brown- *355 Forman Distillers Corp. v. Stewart, 520 S.W.2d 1 (Mo. banc 1975). . Soliday, 861 S.W.2d at 147 . . … State Board of *359 Registration for the Healing Arts v. Warren, 820 S.W.2d 564, 565 (Mo.App. 1991).

St. Joseph & St. Louis Railroad v. St. Louis, Iron Mountain & Southern Railway Co.

135 Mo. 173 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jun 30, 1896

S. v. Hickey, 17 Wall. 9 , and Collins v. Hasbrouck, 56 N. Y. 157 . … Patten v. Deshon, 1 Gray (Mass.), 329 ; Coward v. Gregory, L. R. 2 C. P. 153; Tillotson v. Boyd, 4 Sandford (N. Y.), 521; St. Saviour’s Churchwardens v. Smith, 3 Burr. 1271.

Miller v. Harpster

273 Mo. 605 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Mar 4, 1918

[Shortridge v. Scarritt Estate Co., 145 Mo. App. l. c. 305; Schmitz v. Railway Co., 119 Mo. 256 ; Rosenkranz v. Railway Co., 108 Mo. 9 .] … [Christal v. Craig, 80 Mo. 367 , and cases cited: State ex rel. v. Tittmann, 103 Mo. l. c. 569; Jordan v. Transit Co., 202 Mo. l. c. 428; Finnell v. Street Railway, 159 Mo. App. l. c. 525-6.] *615 Demurrer III.

St. John's Mercy Health System v. Division of Employment Security

273 S.W.3d 510 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jan 13, 2009

The National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) affirmed the ALJ’s recommended order in March 2005. 3 The Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the NLRB finding that St. … John’s Mercy Health Systems v. NLRB, 436 F.3d 843 (8th Cir.2006). 5 .

Crow v. State

14 Mo. 237 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Mar 15, 1851

In Brown vs. … The case of Brown vs.

Dister v. Ludwig

362 Mo. 162 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jun 11, 1951

McGowan v. Wells, 324 Mo. 652 , 24 S. W. 2d 633, 638 , and cases therein cited; Lamoreux v. St. Louis-San Francisco Ry. Co,, 337 Mo. 1028 , 87 S. W. 2d 640 ; Smithers v. Barker; Redden v. Boehmer; Yeaman v. … W. 2d 892 ; Schmitt v. American Press, Mo. App., 42 S. W. 2d 969 ; Hoelker v. American Press, 317 Mo. 64 , 296 S. W. 1008 ; Pitcher v. Schoch, 345 Mo. 1184 , 139 S. W. 2d 463 , and Linders v.

Price v. Metropolitan Street Railway Co.

220 Mo. 435 · Supreme Court of Missouri · May 22, 1909

[Brown v. Railroad, 99 Mo. 318 ; Seckinger v. Mfg. Co., 129 Mo. 590 ; Coontz v. Eailroad, 115 Mo. 674 ; State to use v. Bacon, 24 Mo. App. 405 ; Pinney v. Berry, 61 Mo. 359 ; Barrett v. Telegraph Co., 42 Mo. App. 542 .] … [Seckinger v. Mfg. Co., supra; Grove v. Kansas City, 75 Mo. 672 ; Spurlock v. Railroad, 93 Mo. 530 ; Bowie v.

Faris v. City of Caruthersville

349 Mo. 454 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Apr 16, 1942

[City of Caruthersville v. Faris (Mo. App.), 146 S. W. (2d) 80 .] … [Hecker v. Bleish, 327 Mo. 377 , 37 S. W. (2d) 444 .]

State Ex Rel. Kinder v. Inter-River Drainage District

296 Mo. 320 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Dec 20, 1922

McWilliams v. Little River Drainage District, 269 Mo. 444 ; State ex rel. *328 Caruthers v. Little River Drainage District, 271 Mo. 429 .] … McWilliams v.

State v. Witt

371 S.W.2d 215 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Oct 14, 1963

Brown, Mo., 291 S.W.2d 615 ; State v. Green, Mo., 292 S.W.2d 283 ; State v. Edwards, Mo., 317 S.W. *219 2d 441. … In State v.

State v. Horton

247 Mo. 657 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Feb 19, 1913

Such cases as State v. Newcomb, 220 Mo. 54 ; State v. Goodale, 210 Mo. 275 ; and State v. … In the case of State v.

State ex rel. Parker v. Thompson

41 Mo. 25 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Mar 15, 1867

Wisner, 8 Wend. 661 ; Hastings v. … Lane, 3 Shep. 134; Brown v. Wilcox, 14 S. & M. 127 ; Quackenbush v. Dank, 1 Denio, 128 .

Langstaff v. City of Webster Groves

246 Mo. 223 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Nov 30, 1912

BROWN, C. This is á snit for twenty thousand dollars damages for personal injuries alleged to have been suffered by the plaintiff from falling off a defective sidewalk in defendant city. … [Noble v. Brinson, 231 Mo. 640 ; Wallace v. Libby, 231 Mo. 341 , and cases cited.]

B. & V. Construction Co. v. Shaw-Van Realty Co.

405 S.W.2d 1 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jul 11, 1966

Plaintiff produced invoices for 14-inch board and put in evidence a sample of the 14-inch board used. … Construction Co. 600.05 B. & V.

Glover v. Herald Co.

549 S.W.2d 858 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Apr 11, 1977

In this capacity she attended a meeting of the Board of Aldermen on July 6,1973, at which members of the board debated the merits of a bill to regulate the equipment required at clinics performing abortions. Mrs. … Amant v.

Prague v. Eddy

358 Mo. 327 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Nov 8, 1948

In support of his contention he cites Carle v. Akin (Mo.), 87 S. W. (2d) 406 , and Brown v. Toedebush Transfer Co., 354 Mo. 611 , 190 S. W. (2d) 239 , Those cases are not in point. In Carle v. … In Brown v. Toedebush Transfer Co., an instruction submitted as the proximate cause of the collision the driving of defendant on the wrong-side of the road.

Chouteau v. Eckert

7 Mo. 16 · Supreme Court of Missouri · May 15, 1841

Charles, *18 s0 ^ar as ^ depends upon documentary evidence, is the same that contained in the case of Bird v. Montgomery, 6 Mo, Rep. p. 510. … There seem to be no questions arising in this case, which were not involved in the case of Bird v.

Leavea v. Southern Railway Co.

266 Mo. 151 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Dec 2, 1915

App. 577, 581 ; Taylor v. George, 176 Mo. App. l. c. 222-3; Leavea v. Railroad, 171 Mo. App. l. c. 27; Lieber v. Lieber, 239 Mo. 1 ; Williams v. Edwards, 94 Mo. 447 , as well as other cases in this State. … Brown, C., not sitting. PER CURIAM. — The foregoing opinion of Railey, C., is hereby adopted as the opinion of the court. All of the judges concur.