Case law

Wolf v. New York, Chigago & St. Louis Railroad

347 Mo. 622 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Mar 12, 1941

[Brown v. Ill. Terminal Co., 319 Ill. 326 , 150 N.E. 242 ; Penn. Railroad Co. v. Moffitt, 1 F.2d 276 .] A circumstance also to be considered is that a train was due from the opposite direction. [Fowler v. Chicago E.I. … Note what was said in Brown v. Ill. Terminal Co., 237 Ill.

Meller v. State

438 S.W.2d 187 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Mar 10, 1969

In State v. … Other cases cited by appellant such as Powell v. State of Alabama, 287 U.S. 45 , 53 S.Ct. 55 , 77 L.Ed. 158 ; Tomkins v. State of Missouri, 323 U.S. 485 , 65 S.Ct. 370 , 89 L.Ed. 407 ; and Burgett v.

State v. Dildine

330 Mo. 756 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jun 10, 1932

That ruling in State v. Baird, 271 Mo. 9 , 195 S. W. 1010 , was approved. … [State v. Brown, 304 Mo. l. c. 81, 262 S. W. 710 ; State v. Adams, 318 Mo. 721 , 300 S. W. 738 .] II.

Jenkins v. Wabash Railroad Company

322 S.W.2d 788 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Mar 9, 1959

See also, Lanio v. Kansas City Public Service Co., Mo.Sup., 162 S.W.2d 862 , 866; Nelson v. Evans, 338 Mo. 991 , 93 S.W.2d 691, 693 ; Trzecki v. St. Louis Public Service Co., Mo.Sup., 258 S.W.2d 676 ; Brown v. … Co., 322 Mo. 551 , 18 S.W.2d 481 ; Brown v. Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co., Mo.Sup., 252 S.W. 55 ; Hoelzel v. Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co., 337 Mo. 61 , 85 S.W.2d 126 ; Mullis v.

Latham v. State

439 S.W.2d 737 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Apr 14, 1969

In Kent v. … Brown v. United States, 5 Cir., 1953, 204 F.2d 298, 300-301 , certiorari denied 1954, 346 U.S. 925 , 74 S.Ct. 314 , 98 L.Ed. 418 .

Gutta Percha Rubber Manufacturing Co. v. Kansas City Fire Department Supply Co.

149 Mo. 538 · Supreme Court of Missouri · May 9, 1899

[Barton v. Sitlington, 128 Mo. 164 ; Rock Island Bank v. Powers, 134 Mo. 432 .] … [Bigelow v. Stringer, 40 Mo. 195 ; Shelley v. Boothe, 73 Mo. 74 ; McDonald & Co. v. Hoover, 142 Mo. loc. cit. 498.]

Hach v. Rollins

158 Mo. 182 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Nov 12, 1900

Y.) 410; Baird v. Stearne, 15 Phila. 339 ; Swaine v. Perine, 5 Johns Ch. l. c. 488; Cranson v. Cranson, 4 Mich. 230 ; Brown v. Bronson, 35 Mich. 415 ; Duncan’s Appeal, 43 Pa. St. 67; Jenny v. … [Curd v. Brown, 148 Mo. l. c. 95, and cases cited.] The common law disqualification of a spouse has been abolished in three respects (not applicable here), by section 4656, Revised Statutes 1899.

Missouri Home Savings and Loan Association v. Allen

452 S.W.2d 109 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Mar 9, 1970

They cite 4 American Law of Property 299, § 16.128; 2 Wiltsie on Mortgage Foreclosure (5th Ed.) 1136, § 703; Nelson v. Brown, 140 Mo. 580 , 41 S.W. 960 ; McFarland v. … Powell, Mo.App., 256 S.W. 124 ; Empire Trust Co. v. Hitchcock, 233 Mo.App. 581 , 123 S.W.2d 565 ; Grace v. Gill, 136 Mo.App. 186 , 116 S.W. 442 ; Bensieck v. Cook, 110 Mo. 173 , 19 S.W. 642 ; Nelson v. Brown, supra.

Midstate Oil Co. v. Missouri Commission on Human Rights

679 S.W.2d 842 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Sep 11, 1984

See, e.g., Board of Education of the City of Hartford v. Commission on Human Rights and Opportunities, 176 Conn. 533 , 409 A.2d 1013 (1979); Giles v. Family Court, 411 A.2d 599 (Del. 1980); A.P. … Princeton University Board of Trustees, 77 N.J. 55 , 389 A.2d 465 (1978); Plumbers & Steamfitters Joint Apprenticeship Committee v. Ohio Civil Rights Comm’n, 66 Ohio St.2d 192 , 421 N.E.2d 128 (1981); State v.

St. Louis Catering Co. v. Glancy

294 Mo. 438 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jun 16, 1922

[Bank v. Tiger Tail Mill & Land Co., supra; O’Toole v. Lowenstein, supra; Schwald v. Brunjes, supra; 38 Cyc. 2045.] … In Wittmor v.

Thompson v. Greeley

107 Mo. 577 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Oct 15, 1891

Bank v. … Bent v. Priest, 86 Mo. 482 ; Slattery v. Trans. Co., 91 Mo. 217 ; Ward v. Davidson, 89 Mo. 445 ; Hodges v. Screw Co., 1 R. I. 312; Smith v. Hurd, 12 Metc. 371 ; Attorney General v. Ins. Co., 2 Johns.

Alexander v. Schreiber

10 Mo. 460 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Mar 15, 1847

In the case of Browning vs. … Munns, (3 Lev. 46) cited in the argument of the case of Browning vs. Wright, seems to have been determined on a similar principle.

State Ex Rel. Liggett & Myers Tobacco Co. v. Gehner

316 Mo. 1075 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Apr 8, 1927

They are concisely stated in the record made by respondent board when it assessed the tax in question. … It follows that the action of the Board of Equalization of the City of St.

State v. Ransburg

466 S.W.2d 691 · Supreme Court of Missouri · May 10, 1971

State v. Jackson, Mo., 371 S.W.2d 309 . … State v. Brown, Mo., 443 S.W.2d 805 , authorizes the giving of this instruction at the time it was given. The judgment is affirmed. BARRETT, and PRITCHARD, CC., concur.

Edwards v. Ferguson

73 Mo. 686 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Apr 15, 1881

Defendants, who are the successors in office of a former Board of Regents of the Missouri State Normal Schools, are not responsible individually, either for the acts of their predecessors, or for their own acts unless maliciously … In Reed v. Conway, 20 Mo. 22 , an extended review of the authorities occurs ; that case dominates this one. No cause of action is alleged in the petition, and, therefore, judgment reversed and petition dismissed.

Maggard v. State

471 S.W.2d 161 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Sep 13, 1971

Brown, Mo., 461 S.W.2d 743, 746 ) and the question of effective assistance of counsel must be determined from all the circumstances as they existed at the time the attorney was required to act. State v. … Brown, supra, loc. cit. 746.

Kwilecki v. Holman

258 Mo. 624 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jun 2, 1914

[Pyrolusite Manganese Co. v. Ward, 73 Ga. 491 ; Smith v. Brown, 96 Ga. 274 ; McCrory v. Hlal, 104 Ga. 666 .] … [Albright-Pryor Co. v. Pacific Selling Co., 126 Ga. l. c. 501; Tuells v. Torras, 113 Ga. 691 ; Baker v. Aultman & Co., 107 Ga. 339 .] II.

Duhring v. Duhring

20 Mo. 174 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Oct 15, 1854

It was held in Thornton v. Dixon, 3 Brown’s Ch. Rep. 199, that real estate, used for purposes of a partnership trade, shall go to the heir, and' not to the executor. … Eor this last doctrine, making an agreement necessary to change the nature of the partnership real property to personal, the author cites Coles v. Coles, 15 John. Rep. 159 ; the case from Brown’s Ch. Rep. of Thompson v.

Milton Construction & Supply Co. v. Metropolitan St. Louis Sewer District

352 S.W.2d 685 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Dec 11, 1961

Brawner v. Brawner, Mo.Sup., 327 S.W.2d 808, 815 ; 16A C.J.S. Constitutional Law § 606. … The parties are bound and concluded by their agreement as to these facts, including paragraph 20, Hansen v. Ryan, Mo.Sup., 186 S.W.2d 595 ; Munford v.

Missouri United Methodist Retirement Homes v. State Tax Commission

522 S.W.2d 745 · Supreme Court of Missouri · May 12, 1975

Commissioners v. … Board of Review, 173 N.W.2d 526 (Iowa 1970), where the building was purchased with church funds and the financing of additions was by way of donations from the Methodist Conference; Glass v.