Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersmo

10,000+ results

2.09s

  • Jenkins v. Wabash Railroad Company

    322 S.W.2d 788 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Mar 9, 1959

    See also, Lanio v. Kansas City Public Service Co., Mo.Sup., 162 S.W.2d 862 , 866; Nelson v. Evans, 338 Mo. 991 , 93 S.W.2d 691, 693 ; Trzecki v. St. Louis Public Service Co., Mo.Sup., 258 S.W.2d 676 ; Brown v. … Co., 322 Mo. 551 , 18 S.W.2d 481 ; Brown v. Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co., Mo.Sup., 252 S.W. 55 ; Hoelzel v. Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co., 337 Mo. 61 , 85 S.W.2d 126 ; Mullis v.

    Cited 17 timesPublished
  • Waggoner-Gates Milling Co. v. Ziegler-Zaiss Commission Co.

    128 Mo. 473 · Supreme Court of Missouri · May 21, 1895

    Brown v. Foster, 2 Metc. (Mass.) 152; Fairbanks v. Haynes, 23 Pick. 323 ; Fuller v. Mehl, 33 N. E. Rep. 773; Gilbert v. McCorkle, 110 Ind. 215 ; Cross v. Carstens, 31 N. E. Rep. 506; Whipple v. Stebbens, 35 N. W. … Coats v. Donnell, 94 N. Y. 168 ; Sanford, etc., Co. v. Howe, Brown & Co., 157 U. S. 312 .

    Cited 14 timesPublished
  • Wetterau v. Farmers & Merchants Trust Co.

    285 Mo. 555 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Dec 30, 1920

    Co. v. Withnell, 269 Mo. 546 .] … [Commerce Trust Co. v. Keck, 223 S. W. l. c. 1057; Perkinson v. Hoolan, 182 Mo. l. c. 194.]

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Latham v. State

    439 S.W.2d 737 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Apr 14, 1969

    In Kent v. … Brown v. United States, 5 Cir., 1953, 204 F.2d 298, 300-301 , certiorari denied 1954, 346 U.S. 925 , 74 S.Ct. 314 , 98 L.Ed. 418 .

    Cited 14 timesPublished
  • State Ex Rel. City of St. Louis v. Kinder

    698 S.W.2d 4 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Oct 16, 1985

    Louis City Ordinance No. 59112, 1 approved by the Board of Aldermen of the City on April 6, 1984, and approved by a majority of the voters of the City of St. … Allen v. Barker, 581 S.W.2d 818, 824 (Mo. banc 1979). Prohibition lies to prevent a court from acting in excess of its jurisdiction. Wasson, 646 S.W.2d at 106 . State ex rel. Adrian Bank v.

    Cited 21 timesPublished
  • Witte v. Director of Revenue

    829 S.W.2d 436 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Apr 2, 1992

    Brown Group, Inc. v. Administrative Hearing Comm’n, 649 S.W.2d 874, 877 (Mo. banc 1983), and cases cited therein. … See Gumbhir v.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Hope v. Flentge

    47 L.R.A. 806 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jun 29, 1897

    Gumm v. Hubbard (1889) 97 Mo. 311 ( 11 S. W. Rep. 61 ); Brown v. McCollum (1889) 76 Iowa, 479 ( 41 N. W. Rep. 197 ). … Board of Casnovia (1894) 101 Mich. 187 ( 59 N. W. Rep. 412 ); Boyd v. Mills (1894) 53 Kan. 594 ( 37 Pac. Rep. 16 ); Parker v. Orr (1895) 158 Ill. 609 (30 L. R. A. 227; 41 N. E. Rep. 1002); Page v.

    Cited 23 timesPublished
  • Wolf v. New York, Chigago & St. Louis Railroad

    347 Mo. 622 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Mar 12, 1941

    [Brown v. Ill. Terminal Co., 319 Ill. 326 , 150 N.E. 242 ; Penn. Railroad Co. v. Moffitt, 1 F.2d 276 .] A circumstance also to be considered is that a train was due from the opposite direction. [Fowler v. Chicago E.I. … Note what was said in Brown v. Ill. Terminal Co., 237 Ill.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • State v. Grayson

    467 S.W.2d 891 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jun 14, 1971

    .; State v. Stockdale, Mo., 415 S.W.2d 769 . … In its every aspect this case is governed by State v. Townes and State v. Hamblin, both of which considered and elaborated upon the federal cases.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Papin v. Massey

    27 Mo. 445 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Oct 15, 1858

    Whatever may have been the language of the supreme court in the case of Bissell v. … In the case of Bissell v.

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • State ex rel. Ford Motor Co. v. Godfrey

    505 S.W.2d 59 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Feb 11, 1974

    Louis, Brown, Allen, Schneider, and Stone. The jury returned a verdict against the City of St. Louis, Brown, Allen and Schneider. Nothing was said in the verdict of Stone. … Cunningham v. Haid, 328 Mo. 208 , 40 S.W.2d 1048 (1931) ; Newdiger v.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • State v. Reorganized School District R-VI in Lewis County

    365 Mo. 545 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Nov 14, 1955

    This case was consolidated for argument on appeal with the case of Rathjen v. Reorganized School District R-II of Shelby County, No. 44,-787, 284 S.W.2d 516 . … The legal question involved is the same as presented in the case of Rathjen v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • McCarthy v. Fidelity National Bank & Trust Co.

    325 Mo. 727 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jul 3, 1930

    [McCune v. Reynolds, 288 Ill. 188 ; Campbell v. Campbell, 138 id. 612; McMillan v. … [Wood v. Carpenter, 166 Mo. 485 ; King v. Gilson, 191 Mo. 333 ; Brown v. Anderson, 13 Ga. 171 ; Tibbatts v.

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • State v. Taylor

    18 S.W.3d 366 · Supreme Court of Missouri · May 9, 2000

    Venireperson 64 also knows Charles Brown. 8 Charles Brown tried the Calvert Antwine case back when I was a public defender and the effect of that case. Mr. … Brown, 998 S.W.2d 531 (Mo. banc 1999)(striking venireperson convicted of a felony is race-neutral reason); State v. Smulls, 935 S.W.2d 9, 18 (employed by or related to attorneys survives a Batson challenge); State v.

    Cited 21 timesPublished
  • Love 1979 Partners v. Public Service Commission of Missouri

    715 S.W.2d 482 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jul 15, 1986

    Both parties cite Reilly v. … Danciger & Co. v. Public Service Commission, 275 Mo. 483 , 205 S.W. 36 (1918); State ex rel. Lohman & Farmers’ Mut. Telephone Co. v. Brown, 323 Mo. 818 , 19 S.W.2d 1048 (1929).

    Cited 13 timesPublished
  • Peltzer v. Gilbert

    260 Mo. 500 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jul 14, 1914

    . — I fully concur with the views of our brother Brown in this case.' This record cannot be fairly read without reaching the conclusion that the plaintiffs in this suit in equity are but the “stool pigeons” of B. … Clark Hyde, the défendant in the case of the State of Missouri v. B. Clark Hyde.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Drainage District No. 48 of Dunklin County v. Small

    318 S.W.2d 497 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Dec 8, 1958

    Applegate v. … Pool v. Brown, 98 Mo. 675, 684 , 11 S.W. 743 . Plaintiffs rely on the principle stated in Missouri Power & Light Co. v.

    Cited 14 timesPublished
  • Nichols v. REORGANIZED SCH. DIST. NO. 1 OF LACLEDE CO.

    364 S.W.2d 9 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jan 14, 1963

    Ragland, Ralph Meents, Elmer Young, Russell Caffey, Byron Harris, Members of the Board of Education of said School District, and Mary Lula Miller, Secretary of said Board of Education, Respondents. No. 49580. … City of Bucklin, 349 Mo. 789 , 163 S.W.2d 561, 562 [1]; Butler v. Board of Education of Consolidated School Dist. No. 1 of Audrain County, Mo., 16 S.W.2d 44 [1].

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • State ex rel. Vossbrick v. Carpenter

    388 S.W.2d 823 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Mar 8, 1965

    Eagleton v. Van Landuyt, Mo., 359 S.W.2d 773 . … Black v. Renner, 235 Mo.App. 829 , 148 S.W.2d 809 .

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • State v. Charles C.

    232 Mo. 240 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Feb 7, 1911

    The following decisions present both sides of the proposition: Squire v. State, 46 Ind. 459 ; State v. Armington, 25 Minn. 29 ; Davis v. Com., 76 Ky. 318 ; Commonwealth v. Hayden, 163 Mass. 453 ; Watson v. … J., and Brown, J., concur.

    Cited 3 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.