Case law

Grading Bledsoe Hill v. Bledsoe

200 Mo. 630 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Dec 22, 1906

of commissioners, and must name the time and place for impaneling the new board.” … [Anderson v. Pemberton, 89 *643 Mo. 61 ; Whitely v. Platte County, 73 Mo. 30 ; Jefferson County v. Cowan, 54 Mo. 234 ; Zimmerman v. Snowden, 88 Mo. 218 .]”

Schell v. Stephens

50 Mo. 375 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jul 15, 1872

(Mills v. Hunt, 20 Wend. 431 ; Sto. Agency, §§ 27, 267.) This court, in Thompson v. McCullough, 31 Mo. 224 , applied the principle to vendors of commercial paper. … (Wolf v. Koppel, 5 Hill, 458 ; Sherwood v. Stone, 14 N. Y. 267 ; Browne on Frauds, § 213.) The reason given in Sherwood v.

State Ex Rel. Millar v. Toberman

360 Mo. 1101 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Oct 2, 1950

Barker v. Duncan et al., 265 Mo. 26 , 175 S. … W. (2d) 941, 944 ; Lansdown v. Faris, 66 Fed. (2d) 939; State ex rel. Hanlon v. City of Maplewood, 231 Mo. A. 739, 99 S. W. (2d) 138 ; and State ex rel. Gazzalo v. Hudson, 13 Mo. A. 61-66.

State Ex Rel. City of St. Louis v. Kinder

698 S.W.2d 4 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Oct 16, 1985

Louis City Ordinance No. 59112, 1 approved by the Board of Aldermen of the City on April 6, 1984, and approved by a majority of the voters of the City of St. … Allen v. Barker, 581 S.W.2d 818, 824 (Mo. banc 1979). Prohibition lies to prevent a court from acting in excess of its jurisdiction. Wasson, 646 S.W.2d at 106 . State ex rel. Adrian Bank v.

State v. Grayson

467 S.W.2d 891 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jun 14, 1971

.; State v. Stockdale, Mo., 415 S.W.2d 769 . … In its every aspect this case is governed by State v. Townes and State v. Hamblin, both of which considered and elaborated upon the federal cases.

Graham v. Kirchner

365 Mo. 806 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Mar 12, 1956

The officers and board of directors of the then St. Louis Branch resigned at a meeting, the resignations to be effective when a new board was elected. … One case is cited as authority for that statement, Kuhl v. Meyer, 42 Mo.App. 474 .

State v. Taylor

18 S.W.3d 366 · Supreme Court of Missouri · May 9, 2000

Venireperson 64 also knows Charles Brown. 8 Charles Brown tried the Calvert Antwine case back when I was a public defender and the effect of that case. Mr. … Brown, 998 S.W.2d 531 (Mo. banc 1999)(striking venireperson convicted of a felony is race-neutral reason); State v. Smulls, 935 S.W.2d 9, 18 (employed by or related to attorneys survives a Batson challenge); State v.

State v. Brantley

353 S.W.2d 793 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Feb 19, 1962

Fleenor v. … Buhler v. Pescor, W.D.Mo., 63 F.Supp. 632, 639 [16]. See Burns v. United States, 287 U.S. 216, 220, 221 , 53 S.Ct. 154 , 77 L.Ed. 266 .

Ex parte Jackson

96 Mo. 116 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Apr 15, 1888

Rex v. Wilkes, 4 Burr, 2574, 2577; Kite v. Com., 11 Met. [N. Y.] 581; Com. v. Leath, 1 Va. Cas. 151. … Kite v. Com., 11 Met. (N. Y.) 581; Brown v. Com., 4 Rawle, 259 ; Ex parte Roberts, 9 Nev. 44 ; 1 Bishop on Cr. Law, sec. 953; Ex parte Turner, 45 Mo. 331 .

State v. Charles C.

232 Mo. 240 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Feb 7, 1911

The following decisions present both sides of the proposition: Squire v. State, 46 Ind. 459 ; State v. Armington, 25 Minn. 29 ; Davis v. Com., 76 Ky. 318 ; Commonwealth v. Hayden, 163 Mass. 453 ; Watson v. … J., and Brown, J., concur.

State v. Lumsden

589 S.W.2d 226 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Nov 14, 1979

State v. Brown, 547 S.W.2d 797 (Mo. banc 1977). … State v. Brown, 547 S.W.2d 797, 799 (Mo. banc 1977); State v. Granberry, 484 S.W.2d 295, 299 (Mo. banc 1972) (citing cases); State v. Mann, 83 Mo. 589, 599 (1884).

State v. Gray

406 S.W.2d 580 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Oct 10, 1966

United States v. … State v. Stewart, 329 Mo. 265 , 44 S.W.2d 100, 102 [1]; State v. Barton, Mo., 379 S.W.2d 562, 564 [2,3]; State v.

State v. McGowan

432 S.W.2d 262 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Oct 14, 1968

State v. Allen, Mo., 420 S.W.2d 330, 333 [4]; State v. Rhodes, Mo., 408 S.W.2d 68, 70 [4, 5]; State v. Peterson, Mo., 305 S.W.2d 695, 700 [10, 11]; State v. Ruffin, Mo., 286 S.W.2d 743, 747 [7]. … State v. McCollum, Mo., 377 S.W. 2d 379, 388 [17]; State v. Burrage, Mo., 418 S.W.2d 101, 108 [12].

State ex rel. Vossbrick v. Carpenter

388 S.W.2d 823 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Mar 8, 1965

Eagleton v. Van Landuyt, Mo., 359 S.W.2d 773 . … Black v. Renner, 235 Mo.App. 829 , 148 S.W.2d 809 .

City of St. Louis v. Grimes

630 S.W.2d 82 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Mar 9, 1982

Burke v. … In City of Joplin v.

Waggoner-Gates Milling Co. v. Ziegler-Zaiss Commission Co.

128 Mo. 473 · Supreme Court of Missouri · May 21, 1895

Brown v. Foster, 2 Metc. (Mass.) 152; Fairbanks v. Haynes, 23 Pick. 323 ; Fuller v. Mehl, 33 N. E. Rep. 773; Gilbert v. McCorkle, 110 Ind. 215 ; Cross v. Carstens, 31 N. E. Rep. 506; Whipple v. Stebbens, 35 N. W. … Coats v. Donnell, 94 N. Y. 168 ; Sanford, etc., Co. v. Howe, Brown & Co., 157 U. S. 312 .

Milan Bank v. Richmond

235 Mo. 532 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jul 1, 1911

[State v. Fogg, 206 Mo. l. c. 716.] It is unnecessary for us to discuss the doctrine of the cases which are cited (Browning v. Railroad, 118 Mo. App. l. c. 459; Cox v. Polk, 139 Mo. … Brown, C., concurs. PER CURIAM. — The foregoing-opinion of Blair, C., is adopted as the opinion of the court. All the judges concur.

Fisher v. Stevens

143 Mo. 181 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Mar 1, 1898

Stillwell v. Aaron, 69 Mo. 539 ; St. Joseph Fire & Marine Insurance Co. v. Hauck, 71 Mo. 465 ; Nelson v. Brown et al., 140 Mo. 580 . … Inst., sec. 157; Brown v. Bowen, 90 Mo. 184 ; Heaton v. Myers, 4 Col. 59 ; Tompkins v. Tompkins, 21 N. J. Eq. 338; In re Betts, 4 Dill. 93 ; 4 Am. and Eng. Ency. of Law [2 Ed.], 154; Solomons v. Jones, 3 Brev. (S.

Swearingen v. Wabash Railroad

221 Mo. 644 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jun 29, 1909

There is no breaking of the cloth covering the card board, *659 but just in one little piece tbe card board seems to be loosened. … In Yarnell v.

State v. Reorganized School District R-VI in Lewis County

365 Mo. 545 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Nov 14, 1955

This case was consolidated for argument on appeal with the case of Rathjen v. Reorganized School District R-II of Shelby County, No. 44,-787, 284 S.W.2d 516 . … The legal question involved is the same as presented in the case of Rathjen v.