Case law

Beckett v. Beckett

48 Mo. 396 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Aug 15, 1871

Brown, 19 Penn. St. 359.) … (Fairchild v. Bentley, 30 Barb. 147 .) In the case of Lyke v.

Ex parte Jackson

96 Mo. 116 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Apr 15, 1888

Rex v. Wilkes, 4 Burr, 2574, 2577; Kite v. Com., 11 Met. [N. Y.] 581; Com. v. Leath, 1 Va. Cas. 151. … Kite v. Com., 11 Met. (N. Y.) 581; Brown v. Com., 4 Rawle, 259 ; Ex parte Roberts, 9 Nev. 44 ; 1 Bishop on Cr. Law, sec. 953; Ex parte Turner, 45 Mo. 331 .

Gilkeson v. Knight

71 Mo. 403 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Apr 15, 1880

Brown v. Woody, 64 Mo. 547 . 3.-. The rule as laid down in the case of Eldridge v.

Tierney v. Spiva

76 Mo. 279 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Oct 15, 1882

In Rucker v. … Brown v. Burrus, 8 Mo. 26 ; State v. Porter, 26 Mo. 209 ; Dozier v. Jerman, 30 Mo. 220 ; Seibert v. Allen, 61 Mo. 482 . In Johnston v.

State v. Grayson

467 S.W.2d 891 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jun 14, 1971

.; State v. Stockdale, Mo., 415 S.W.2d 769 . … In its every aspect this case is governed by State v. Townes and State v. Hamblin, both of which considered and elaborated upon the federal cases.

Lyter v. Vestal

355 Mo. 457 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Sep 9, 1946

II, Scott on Trusts, sec. 187.2, pp. 992-3; and examine the case of First National Bank v. Snead, 24 F.2d 186 , cited by Board of Curators. … Walker v. James, 337 Mo. 750 , 85 S.W.2d 876 ; Ames v. Scudder, supra; Vol. I, Restatement of the Law of Trusts, sec. 194, p. 516; 54 Am.

Farrell v. Union Trust Co.

77 Mo. 475 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Apr 15, 1883

Elliott v. Hann. & St. Jo. R. R. Co., 66 Mo. 683 . This suit was based upon the 43rd section. … In Turner v. Hann. & St. Jo. R. R.

State v. Sivils

105 Mo. 530 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Apr 15, 1891

State v. Brown, 75 Mo. 317 ; State v. Mallon, 75 Mo. 355 ; State v. Burk, 89 Mo. 635 . The court gave to the jury the following instructions: “10. … State v. Hundley, 46 Mo. 414 ; Fine v. Public Schools, 39 Mo. 67 ; Rose v. Spies, 44 Mo. 21 ; State v. Smith, 53 Mo. 267 ; State v. Harris, 59 Mo. 556 ; State v. Bell, 70 Mo. 633 . II.

Swearingen v. Wabash Railroad

221 Mo. 644 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jun 29, 1909

There is no breaking of the cloth covering the card board, *659 but just in one little piece tbe card board seems to be loosened. … In Yarnell v.

Gruenewaelder v. Wintermann

360 S.W.2d 678 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Sep 10, 1962

Shaltupsky v. Brown Shoe Co., 350 Mo. 831 , 168 S.W.2d 1083 ; Seegers v. … Kansas City v. Rathford, supra; Shaltupsky v. Brown Shoe Co., supra; and Rippe v. Sutter, supra.

Muehlhausen v. St. Louis Railroad

91 Mo. 332 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Oct 15, 1886

The second instruction for plaintiffs is warranted by the rule stated in Sherman v. … McKeon v. Railroad, 43 Mo. 405 ; Whalen v. Railroad, 60 Mo. 328 ; Karle v. Railroad, 55 Mo. 476.

Edwards v. Woods.

342 Mo. 1097 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Aug 17, 1938

[Meily v. St. Louis S.F. Railroad Co., 215 Mo. 567 , l.c. 587-589, 114 S.W. 1013 , l.c. 1019, 1020 (2); McIntyre v. St. … In Radler v. St.

State v. Charles C.

232 Mo. 240 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Feb 7, 1911

The following decisions present both sides of the proposition: Squire v. State, 46 Ind. 459 ; State v. Armington, 25 Minn. 29 ; Davis v. Com., 76 Ky. 318 ; Commonwealth v. Hayden, 163 Mass. 453 ; Watson v. … J., and Brown, J., concur.

State ex rel. Jones v. Howe Scale Co.

253 Mo. 63 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Dec 6, 1913

[State v. Newell, 140 Mo. 282 ; State ex rel. v. Warner, 197 Mo. l. c. 665.] … Brown, C., concurs. PER CURIAM. The foregoing opinion of Blair, C., is adopted as the opinion of the court. All the judges concur.

Wattels v. Marre

303 S.W.2d 9 · Supreme Court of Missouri · May 13, 1957

One of defendants’ witnesses said the step was “a light brown. * * * It’s brown material, terrazzo.” Plaintiff’s witness George H. … Summa v. Morgan Real Estate Co., 350 Mo. 205 , 165 S.W.2d 390, 393 ; Douglas v. Douglas, supra; Cameron v. Small, supra.

Foster v. Missouri Pacific Railway Co.

115 Mo. 165 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Mar 25, 1893

Rep. 371 ; Abel, Ex’x, v. President, etc. (1891), 128 N. Y. 662 ; 28 N. E. … Russ v. Railroad (1892), 112 Mo. 45 ; 18 L. R. A. 823; Stephens v. Railroad (1888), 96 Mo. 207 ; Dowling v. Allen (1881), 74 Mo. 14 . 5.

Landwehr v. Moberly

338 Mo. 1106 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Apr 23, 1936

Boswell Post of the American Legion v. Farmers’ State Bank of Mt. Vernon (Mo. App.), 61 S. W. (2d) 761 , 762; Craig v. Bank of Granby, 210 Mo. App. 334 , 238 S. … [Compton v. Farmers’ Trust Co. (Mo. App.), 279 S. W. 746 ; Mo. Mutual Assn. v. Holland Banking Co., 220 Mo. App. 1256 , 290 S. W. 100 ; Paul v. Draper, 158 Mo. 197 , 59 S. W. 77 .]

State v. Crocker

335 S.W.2d 32 · Supreme Court of Missouri · May 9, 1960

.; § 546.440; State v. Turpin, 332 Mo. 1012 , 61 S.W.2d 945, 947, 948 [13-15]; State v. Huff, Mo., 173 S.W.2d 895 [3,4]; State v. … Brown, 339 Mo. 1014 , 98 S.W.2d 777 [1-3, 6]; State v. Loyd, Mo., 233 S.W.2d 658 [2,4]). For cases involving punishments assessed by the court and timely motions for new trial, see State v.

City of St. Louis v. Nash

266 Mo. 523 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jan 6, 1916

And in each aisle there is a board walk eight feet wide composed of one by two boards laid flat on the ground and nailed to cross pieces sunk in the ground. … Stanley, 150 Mass. 6 ; Favro v. State, 73 Am. St. 950; Williams v. State, 70 Am. St. 82; State v. Poole, 65 Kan. 713 ; People v. Stickman, 34 Cal. 242 .

Merchants' & Manufacturers' Insurance v. Curran

45 Mo. 142 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Oct 15, 1869

They were but the subordinates of the board of directors, and held their positions under appointment of the board. Their duties were subordinate, and imposed for the convenient transaction of business. … . • The case at bar is wholly unlike Plahto v. the plaintiffs, 38 Mo. 248 , and Mound City Ins. Co. v. the defendants, 42 Mo. 374 ; but the U. M. F. Ins. Co. v. Keyser, 32 N.