Case law

Moskowitz v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United States

544 S.W.2d 13 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Dec 13, 1976

The power and authority to examine registered nurses and practical nurses was vested in the State Board of Nurse Examiners. … In Prange v.

Gillen v. Bayfield

329 Mo. 681 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Feb 11, 1932

Gillen to have rooms and board for himself and family. "(Signed) W. BAYFIELD." … [Hudson v. Browning, 264 Mo. 58 , l.c. 65, 174 S.W. 393 . See, also, Huttig v. Brennan, 41 S.W.2d 1054 , l.c. 1062, and authorities there cited.]

Division of Employment Security v. Taney County District R-III

922 S.W.2d 391 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Apr 23, 1996

V, §10. Reversed. I. … The state board attached the lapsed territory to the Taney County R-III School District [“Taney County”].

State ex inf. Dalton v. Moody

325 S.W.2d 21 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jun 8, 1959

United States v. Brown, Fed.Cas.No.14,671, 1 Sawy. 531 . … Those cases are Attorney General v. Pelletier, 240 Mass. 264 , 134 N.E. 407 , and People ex rel. Hirschberg v. Board of Supervisors of Orange County, 251 N.Y. 156, 170, 171 , 167 N.E. 204, 210 .

R. J. Waddell Investment Co. v. Hall

255 Mo. 675 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Mar 3, 1914

In Gist v. Construction. … [Becker v. Washington (1888), 94 Mo. 375 .]” To like effect in Construction Co. v.

State Ex Rel. Blue Springs v. McWilliams

335 Mo. 816 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jul 31, 1934

Louis v. Dreisoerner, 243 Mo. 217, 223 , 147 S. W. 998 ; Hays v. City of Poplar Bluff, 263 Mo. 516, 531, 532 , 173 S. W. 676 ; Van Eaton v. Town of Sidney, 211 Iowa, 986 , 231 N. W. 475 .] … W. 151 ; City of Nevada to use of Gilfillan v. Eddy, 123 Mo. 546, 558 , 27 S. W. 471 ; State ex rel. Barlow v. Holtcamp, 332 Mo. 258 , 14 S. W. (2d) 646, 650 ; Heidelberg v. St.

Lewis v. Gibbons

80 S.W.3d 461 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Aug 5, 2002

Endicott v. Display Technologies, Inc., 77 S.W.3d 612 (Mo. banc 2002); Owens v. … SSM Health Care v.

Hogan v. Fleming

317 Mo. 524 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jun 25, 1927

[Brunke v. Telephone Co., 115 Mo. App. 36 ; Caldwell v. Payne, 246 S.W. 312 , 317; Gordon v. Railway Co., 222 Mo. 516 , 536; Cassin v. Lusk, 277 Mo. 663 , 678.] … In Sadler v.

North St. Louis Building & Loan Ass'n v. Obert

169 Mo. 507 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Oct 14, 1902

[Westervelt v. … In Gay v.

Holmes v. Kansas City

209 Mo. 513 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Feb 26, 1908

[Bertles v. Nunan, 92 N. Y. 156 ; Coleman v. Bresnaham, 54 Hun 619 .] … [Bains v. Bullock, supra.]

Webb City & Carterville Waterworks Co. v. City of Carterville

142 Mo. 101 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Dec 14, 1897

“Board of prisoners and supplies for city jail. “Cost of preparing tax books. “Necessary supplies for city officials.” … Co. v.

Gray v. Fox

43 Mo. 570 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Mar 15, 1869

In Brown v. Payson, 6 N. … To the same effect is Wheatley v. Williams, 1 Mees. & W. 533 ; and so in Coveney v. Tannahill et al., 1 Hill, 33 . That the communications to Mr.

State v. Cooley

388 S.W.2d 807 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Apr 12, 1965

State v. Knicker, Mo.Sup., 364 S.W.2d 544 ; State v. Hooper, Mo.Sup., 364 S.W.2d 542 ; State v. Crocker, supra; State v. Kenton, Mo.Sup., 298 S.W.2d 433 ; State v. Ash, Mo.Sup., 286 S.W.2d 808 . … Time for filing being mandatory and nonwaivable by the state (State v. Brown, 339 Mo. 1014 , 98 S.W.2d 777, 779 (5, 6) ), we notice the matter although it has not been raised by the state.

City of Albany v. Gilbert

144 Mo. 224 · Supreme Court of Missouri · May 24, 1898

By section 1589 it is provided that the mayor and board of aldermen of cities of the fourth class shall have power “to pass ordinances to locate and lay out new streets and alleys and to establish their1 grade, and to widen … State ex rel. v. Macon Co. Ct., 41 Mo. 454 ;. Manker v. Faulhaber, 94 Mo. 430 and cases cited. 23 Am. and Eng. Ency. of Law, pp. 489-493 and notes.

City of St. Louis ex rel. Glencoe Lime & Cement Co. v. Von Phul

133 Mo. 561 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Mar 17, 1896

Louis v. … The same power was recognized in the board of public schools in Luthy v. Woods, 6 Mo. App. 68 , and in the city of St. Louis in case of St. Louis v. Keane, 27 Mo. App. 644 . In the case of Knapp v.

Forrister v. Sullivan

231 Mo. 345 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Nov 30, 1910

.; Berg v. Moreau, 199 Mo. l. c. 433, et seq.; Kinney v. Murray, 170 Mo. 700 ; Rosenwald v. Middlebrook, 188 Mo. 58 . … (Brown v. Foster, 112 Mo. 299 ) is not in point. (3) . It is argued plaintiff was competent to contradict the testimony of admissions made by him to witnesses for defendants.

State of Missouri ex rel. April L. Coleman, Relator v. The Honorable Wendy L. Wexler Horn

568 S.W.3d 14 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Mar 5, 2019

V, sec. 4. … Strauser v. Martinez , 416 S.W.3d 798 , 801 (Mo. banc 2014).

Kennedy v. Union Electric Co.

358 Mo. 504 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Nov 8, 1948

[Sherwood v. St. Louis Southwestern Ry. Co. (Mo. App.) 187 S. W. 260 ; Brown v. C. B. & Q. R. Co., 195 Fed. 1007 ; Standley v. A. T. & S. F. R. Co., 121 Mo. App 537, 97 S. W. 244 ; McAdams v. Davis, 200 Ia. 204 , 202 N. … W. 515 ; Pfannebecker v. C. R. I. & P. R. Co., 226 N. W. 161 .] However, in this case no an-tieipatable flood would have touched plaintiffs’ building; none ever had been that high at this place.

State v. Long

278 Mo. 379 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jun 3, 1919

[State v. Ballard, 104 Mo. 634 .] In other words, among other requisites it takes the ruling of the court nisi upon the question of variance to preserve such question for appellate review. … [People v. Ferguson, 119 Mich. 373 ; State v. Rollo. 3 Penne. (Del.) 421; Rogers v. State, 90 Ga. 403 ; 25 Cyc. 125.]

Ferrell v. Ferrell

253 Mo. 167 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Dec 6, 1913

Louis v. St. Louis Gaslight Company, 70 Mo. 69 , 102 et seq. [See also Bales v. Gilbert, 84 Mo. App. 675, 679 .] In Bowen v. … [Thompson v. Turney, 114 Mo. App. 697 .]