Case law

Zoll v. Soper

75 Mo. 460 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Apr 15, 1882

Brown's Adm'r v. Finley, 18 Mo. 375 ; George v. Williamson, 26 Mo. 190 ; Merry v. Freemon, 44 Mo. 518 . In George v. … Merry v. Fremon, 44 Mo. 518 . Land conveyed by the intestate in fraud of his creditors, is not assets of his estate, and this distinguishes this from the case of Titterington v.

Acme Royalty Co. v. Director of Revenue

96 S.W.3d 72 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Nov 26, 2002

Appellant BIC is also a Delaware corporation; it holds its board meetings in Fort Worth, Texas, and pays taxes in that state. … Quill Corp. v. North Dakota, 504 U.S. 298 , 112 S.Ct. 1904 , 119 L.Ed.2d 91 (1992). See also, Hanson v. Denckla, 357 U.S. 235 , 78 S.Ct. 1228 , 2 L.Ed.2d 1283 (1958), and Keeton v.

Gibbany v. Walker

342 Mo. 156 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Feb 25, 1938

The latest case on the question is Welsh v. Brown (1936), 339 Mo. 235 , 96 S.W.2d 345 , decided by Division Two. … In Welsh v. Brown, supra, 339 Mo. l.c. 239, 96 S.W.2d l.c. 347, it is suggested that the Ballinger case leaves the law in a state of confusion because there Division One attempted to overrule Tooker v.

State v. Dooms

280 Mo. 84 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Dec 4, 1919

In the case of State v. … In State v. Schieller, 130 Mo. l.c. 515, the same doctrine is announced, and also in the cases of State v. Mitchell, 237 Mo. 212 ; State v. Moxley, 115 Mo. l.c. 651; State v. Jones, 106 Mo. 302 , and State v.

Murphy v. Concordia Publishing House

348 Mo. 753 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jun 12, 1941

The question in Roche's Beach, Inc. v. … Supp.2d l.c. 996): "In support of that contention he (counsel) has cited decisions of the Federal courts and the Board *Page 760 of Tax Appeals.

Reigart v. Manufacturers Coal & Coke Co.

217 Mo. 142 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Mar 9, 1909

[Browne on Statute of Frauds, sec. 384; Benjamin on Sales (Bennett’s Ed.), secs. 249, 250; Smith v. Shell, 82 Mo. 215 ; North & Co. v. Mendel, 73 Ga. 400 ; Fry v. Platt, 32 Kan. 62 ; Williams v. … [Browning v. Walbrun, 45 Mo. l. c. 478; Standard Fireproofing Co. v. St. Louis Fireproofing Co., supra, p. 571; State v. Cunningham, supra, p. 172; Koons v. St. Louis Car Co., supra, p. 255; Binger v.

Murphy v. Wabash Railroad

115 Mo. 111 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Mar 25, 1893

It was a pine board fence.” … Devlin v. Railroad, 87 Mo. 545 ; Waldhier v. Railroad, 87 Mo. 37 ; Johnson v. Railroad, supra; Railroad v. Davis, supra.

Bowery v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.

356 Mo. 545 · Supreme Court of Missouri · May 12, 1947

South Chicago Coal & Dock Co. v. Bassett, 309 U. S. 251 ; Swanson v. Marra Bros., Inc., 328 U. S. 1 . … in her navigation, without reference to the nature of the arrangement under which they are on board.”

National Bank of Commerce v. Morris

19 L.R.A. 463 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Feb 14, 1893

Rice v. Brown, 9 Cush. 309 ; Bank v. Metcalf, 40 Mo. App. 501 . The same rule applies in Illinois where the cattle were sold. Hinney v. Baldwin, 16 Ill. 108 ; Smith v. Whitaker, 23 Ill. 369 ; Mumford v. … Canty, 50 Ill. 371 ; Roundtree v. Baker, 52 Ill. 241 ; also in Kansas, Ramsey v. Glenn, 33 Kan. 271 ; Brown v. Campbell, 44 Kan. 237 ; Handley v. Harris, 29 Pac. Rep. (Kan.) 1145; Bank v. Massey, 30 Pac. Rep.

State ex rel. United Railways Co. v. Reynolds

257 Mo. 19 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Apr 2, 1914

BROWN, J. Certiorari to quash judgment of the St. Louis Court of Appeals. This is an original action in this court to quash a .judgment entered by the St. … [Kerr v. Railroad, *39 113 Mo. App. 5 ; Harmon, v. Donohoe, 153 Mo. 274 ; Matthews v. Railroad, 142 Mo. 666 ; Browning v. Railroad, 124 Mo. 55 .] ” ■ We think the alleged error in the Nelson case is without merit.

White v. City of Columbia

461 S.W.2d 806 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Dec 14, 1970

Gen. v. … Gen. v. Board of Com’rs. of Crow Wing County, 66 Minn. 519 , 69 N.W. 925 , 35 L.R.A. 745 .” (Emphasis ours.) In State ex rel. Junior College District of Sedalia v.

State v. Wade

263 Mo. 262 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jan 4, 1915

A jury convicted defendant of taking Elsie Brown, a female person under eighteen years of age, from her father, Harry E. … It was so held by Faris, J., in the recent case of State v. Scobee, 255 Mo. 270 . The information was filed September 20,1913, and is sufficient in form and substance.

State v. Hyder

258 Mo. 225 · Supreme Court of Missouri · May 26, 1914

BROWN, J. — Convicted of the crime of assault with intent to kill, as denounced by section 4481, Eevised Statutes 1909, defendant appeals from a judgment fixing his punishment at five years in the penitentiary. … Young, 99 Mo. 666 ; State v. Brown, 104 Mo. 365 ; State v. Morrison, 104 Mo. 638 ; State v. Young, 105 Mo. 634 ; State v. Mounce, 106 Mo. 226 ; State v. Ihrig, 106 Mo. 267 ; State v. Noeninger, 108 Mo. 166 ; State v.

State Ex Rel. McClellan v. Godfrey

519 S.W.2d 4 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Feb 21, 1975

Louis v. Clabby, 88 Mo. 573 (1886); State v. Mason, 153 Mo. 23 , 54 S.W. 524 (1899); State v. Sheehan, 269 Mo. 421 , 190 S.W. 864 (1916); State ex Inf. Gentry v. Armstrong, 286 S.W. 705 (Mo.banc 1926); State v. … In State v.

Odom v. Langston

358 Mo. 241 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Sep 13, 1948

Clay v. Waters, 101 C. C. A. 645 , 178 Fed. 385 . In the case of Merchants’ Stock & Grain Co., et al. v. Board of Trade of City of Chicago, et al., 187 Fed. 398 , 109 C. C. … Gompers v. Bucks Stove & Range Co., 221 U. S. 418, 442, 443 , 31 Sup. Ct. 492, 498, 58 L. Ed. 797 , 34 L. R. A. [N. S.] 874. We cited the above ,quotation with approval in the case of McNealey v. Rouse, Sheriff, 264 S.

Englehart v. Serena

318 Mo. 263 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Dec 2, 1927

[Dritt v. Snodgrass, 66 Mo. 286 ; Deskins v. Gose, supra.] The situation which confronted the President of the Teachers’ College has been described. … [Arnold v. School District, 78 Mo. 233 ; In re Rebenack, 62 Mo. App. 8 .]

Libby v. Boward

288 Mo. 148 · Supreme Court of Missouri · May 26, 1921

This contention is sound and supported by our former rulings, some of which are as follows: Brown v. Brown's Admr., 68 Mo. l.c. 390; Register v. Hensley, 70 Mo. l.c. 194; Davidson v. Davis, 86 Mo. 440 ; Burgess v. … Bowles, 99 Mo. 543 ; Quinn v. Kinyon, 100 Mo. l.c. 553; Linville v. Hartly, 130 Mo. 252 ; Keene v. Wyatt, 160 Mo. l.c. 9; Brewington v. Brewington, 211 Mo. 48 ; Bushnell v. Loomis, 234 Mo. l.c. 384-5; Balance v.

T. J. Moss Tie Co. v. State Tax Commission

345 S.W.2d 191 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Apr 10, 1961

See Foley Brothers, Inc. v. Commonwealth, Pa.Sup., 400 Pa. 584 , 163 A.2d 80, 84 [5-7]; Feldman v. Board of Pharmacy of Dist. of Columbia, D.C.Mun.App., 160 A.2d 100, 102 [3]; City of Asbury Park v. … Federal Communications Commission, 104 U.S.App.D.C. 126 , 259 F.2d 941 ; New Jersey State Board of Optometrists v. Nemitz, 21 N.J. Super. 18 , 90 A.2d 740, 748 [13].

Jackson v. St. Louis, Iron Mountain & Southern Railway Co.

80 Mo. 147 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Oct 15, 1883

Wilson v. Haxby, 76 Mo. 345 ; State ex rel. Estes v. … In Brown v. H. St. Jo. R. R. Co„ 75 Mo. 427 , the statement alleged that: “ The killing of the animal was done in the county of Clinton, Lafayette township and.

STATE EX REL. COM'RS v. Schneider

609 S.W.2d 149 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Dec 15, 1980

Louis County v. State Tax Commission, 608 S.W.2d 413 (Mo. banc 1980). … Robinson v. Thompson, 38 Mo. 192 (1866).