Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersmo

10,000+ results

1.00s

  • State v. Jackson

    340 Mo. 748 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Mar 11, 1937

    [State v. Gilmore, 336 Mo. 784 , 81 S. W. (2d) 431 ; State v. Hawley (Mo.), 51 S. … [See State v. Hubbs, 294 Mo. 224, 242 . S. W. 675; State v. Levan, 306 Mo. 507 , 267 S. W. 935 ; State v. Bunch, 333 Mo. 20 , 62 S. W. (2d) 439 ; State v. McVey (Mo.), 66 S. W. (2d) 857 . V.

    Cited 14 timesPublished
  • State ex rel. United Railways Co. v. Reynolds

    257 Mo. 19 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Apr 2, 1914

    BROWN, J. Certiorari to quash judgment of the St. Louis Court of Appeals. This is an original action in this court to quash a .judgment entered by the St. … [Kerr v. Railroad, *39 113 Mo. App. 5 ; Harmon, v. Donohoe, 153 Mo. 274 ; Matthews v. Railroad, 142 Mo. 666 ; Browning v. Railroad, 124 Mo. 55 .] ” ■ We think the alleged error in the Nelson case is without merit.

    Cited 31 timesPublished
  • State ex rel. Connors v. Shelton

    238 Mo. 281 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Dec 16, 1911

    In consequence of all these things dissentions sprang up in the board of directors and made out of question any co-operation and concert of action. … Graves, Ferriss, Brown, and Kennish, JJ., concur; Valliant, G. J., concurs in result; Wood-son, J., dissents.

    Cited 21 timesPublished
  • State Ex Rel. Scott v. Kirkpatrick

    484 S.W.2d 161 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Sep 6, 1972

    State v. … As said in State v.

    Cited 11 timesPublished
  • Jacobs v. City of St. Joseph

    204 Mo. 356 · Supreme Court of Missouri · May 29, 1907

    [State v. Raymond, 156 Mo. 117 ; Coleman v. Cole, 158 Mo. 253 ; Kirkwood v. Meramec *358 Highlands Co., 160 Mo. 111 ; Clark v. Porter, 162 Mo. 516 ; Hanlon v. Pulitzer Pub. Co., 167 Mo. 121 ; Ash v. … Independence, 169 Mo. 77 ; Hardin v. Carthage, 171 Mo. 442 ; Brown v. Railroad, 175 Mo. 185 ; State ex rel. v. Smith, 176 Mo. 44 ; Kimble v. Railroad, 183 Mo. 70 ; City of Tarkio v. Clark, 186 Mo. 285 ; State ex rel. v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Union Trust Co. v. Pagenstecher

    221 Mo. 121 · Supreme Court of Missouri · May 31, 1909

    [Book v. Earl, 87 Mo. 246 ; Lamar Water Co. v. City of Lamar, 128 Mo. l. c. 221; State ex rel. v. Railroad, 169 Mo. 563 ; Aurora Water Co. v. City of Aurora, 129 Mo. 540 ; Brooks v. Schultz, 178 Mo. 222 ; Evans v. … McFarland, 186 Mo. l. c. 726; City of Lexington ex rel. v. Lafayette Co. Bank, 165 Mo. l. c. 682; City of Stanberry v. Jordan, 145 Mo. 371 .]

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • In Re Union Electric Company of Missouri

    349 Mo. 73 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Mar 10, 1942

    A well-reasoned opinion entirely consistent and harmonious with the case of Union Electric Co. v. Coale, supra, is that of Appeal of Standard Marine Insurance Company, Limited, 4 U. S. Board of Tax App. Rep. 853. The. … Manitowoc Gas Co. v. Tax Commission (Wis.), 152 N.

    Cited 20 timesPublished
  • Moskowitz v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United States

    544 S.W.2d 13 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Dec 13, 1976

    The power and authority to examine registered nurses and practical nurses was vested in the State Board of Nurse Examiners. … In Prange v.

    Cited 12 timesPublished
  • Mound City Land & Stock Co. v. Miller

    60 L.R.A. 190 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Nov 26, 1902

    Duchene, 21 Mich. 498 (where drain commissioners to be appointed by the board of supervisors were provided for); Comrs. of Highways v. … S. 701 (where the people of the district were authorized to organize as a district, and to elect a board of trustees to manage the matter); Turlock Irrigation District v.

    Cited 57 timesPublished
  • Warder v. Henry

    117 Mo. 530 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Nov 6, 1893

    Alexander v. Merry, 9 Mo. 514 ; Robson v. Thomas, 55 Mo. 581; Hughes v. McDivitt, 102 Mo. 77 ; Wilson v. Quigley, 107 Mo. 98 . … Wiser v. Chesley, 53 Mo. 549 ; Mueller v. Insurance Co., 45 Mo. 84 .

    Cited 30 timesPublished
  • State Ex Rel. Union E.L. P. v. Pub. Serv. Comm.

    333 Mo. 426 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Aug 3, 1933

    Louis v. … Ponath v. Hamilton (Mo.), 240 S.W. 445 ; Custer v. Kroeger, 313 Mo. 130 , 280 S.W. 1035 , 44 A.L.R. 1328 ; Bushman v. Barlow, 321 Mo. 1052 , 15 S.W.2d 329 ; Kinnerk v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • State ex rel. Hill v. Pettingill

    279 Mo. 31 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jun 25, 1919

    Since the district has not reorganized under the Act of 1913, let it be conceded that the rule contended for (State ex rel. v. … It runs counter to the principle approved in State ex rel. v. Drainage District, supra, and applied in a like situation to drainage districts.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • State v. Neal

    350 Mo. 1002 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Mar 25, 1943

    Brown, 63 Mo. 439, 444 , used the exact definition found in the civil statute. But State v. … Also in this State some of the proceedings after the return of the verdict are excluded (such as the hearing on the motion for new trial, under the Brown case, supra).

    Cited 39 timesPublished
  • Arnold v. Scandrett

    345 Mo. 115 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Sep 14, 1939

    Prior to July or August, 1935, this setoff and others had been provided with boards, between the rails, extending up to the top thereof, and board runways, out on the setoff, extending up as high as the rails. … [Martin v. Wabash Ry. Co., 325 Mo. 1107 , 30 S.W.2d 735 , l.c. 742; McDaniel v. Chicago, R.I. P. Ry. Co., 338 Mo. 481 , 92 S.W.2d 118 , l.c. 120, and cases there cited.] In Williams v.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Zoll v. Soper

    75 Mo. 460 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Apr 15, 1882

    Brown's Adm'r v. Finley, 18 Mo. 375 ; George v. Williamson, 26 Mo. 190 ; Merry v. Freemon, 44 Mo. 518 . In George v. … Merry v. Fremon, 44 Mo. 518 . Land conveyed by the intestate in fraud of his creditors, is not assets of his estate, and this distinguishes this from the case of Titterington v.

    Cited 24 timesPublished
  • Glidewell v. Glidewell

    360 Mo. 713 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jun 13, 1950

    In January, 1948, the General Board of the Church of the Nazarene, a corporation, intervened. … Willis was elected one of the 3 members, and vice president, of the Board of Trustees. He attended the- church regularly.

    Cited 13 timesPublished
  • State v. Christian

    253 Mo. 382 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Dec 9, 1913

    [State v. Cushenberry, 157 Mo. 168 ; State v. Temple, 194 Mo. 228 ; State v. Harper, 149 Mo. 514 ; State v. Maupin, 196 Mo. l. c. 174.] … Brown, P. J., and Walker, J., concur.

    Declined to follow by State v. Stoy, 117 Kan. 124 (1924)Cited 16 timesPublished
  • Michler v. Krey Packing Co.

    363 Mo. 707 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Dec 8, 1952

    We think the situation is correctly analyzed in the opinion of the United States Supreme Court in Universal Camera Corp. v. National Labor Relations Board, 340 U. S. 474 , 71 S. Ct. 456 , 95 L. Ed. 456 . … The ‘substantial evidence’ standard is not modified in any way when the Board and its examiner disagree.

    Overruled on other grounds by Hampton v. Big Boy Steel Erection, 2003 Mo. LEXIS 168 (2003)Cited 101 timesPublished
  • State v. Hyder

    258 Mo. 225 · Supreme Court of Missouri · May 26, 1914

    BROWN, J. — Convicted of the crime of assault with intent to kill, as denounced by section 4481, Eevised Statutes 1909, defendant appeals from a judgment fixing his punishment at five years in the penitentiary. … Young, 99 Mo. 666 ; State v. Brown, 104 Mo. 365 ; State v. Morrison, 104 Mo. 638 ; State v. Young, 105 Mo. 634 ; State v. Mounce, 106 Mo. 226 ; State v. Ihrig, 106 Mo. 267 ; State v. Noeninger, 108 Mo. 166 ; State v.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • State v. Tharp

    375 S.W.2d 66 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Oct 14, 1963

    Defendant cites and relies upon the case of People v. … The State cites the case of Compton v. People, 84 Colo. 106 , 268 P. 577 (1928).

    Cited 1 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.