Case law

Goslin v. Kurn

351 Mo. 395 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jul 6, 1943

Plaintiff intended to board the northwest corner of the front car (called the point), but Gunning, the pin puller in the crew, was on the point, and plaintiff attempted to board the northwest corner of the car next to the … O'Brien v. Vandalia Bus Lines, Inc., supra; Johnson v. Chicago E.I. Ry. Co., 334 Mo. 22 , 64 S.W.2d 674 ; Mitchell v. Wabash Ry. Co., 334 Mo. 926 , 69 S.W.2d 286 ; Evens v. Terminal R. Assn. (Mo. Sup.), 69 S.W.2d 979 .

Land Clearance for Redevelopment Authority v. Zitko

386 S.W.2d 69 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Dec 14, 1964

These five shareholders also constituted the first board of directors. … Draper v. Shoot, 25 Mo. 197, 202 . Respondents’ exhibit C, the deed of May 27, 1950, recited that the instrument was signed and sealed by authority of its board of directors.

Jennings v. City of St. Louis

332 Mo. 173 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Feb 23, 1933

of charities and defines its functions; Section 12930 requires this board to supervise public relief to the poor; Section 12938 authorizes cities to provide for a social welfare board; Section 7330 gives cities under special … [San Francisco v. Collins, 13 Pac. (2d) 912 ; State ex rel. v. Industrial Commission, 242 N. W. 321 .]

Nelson v. Hotchkiss

601 S.W.2d 14 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jul 15, 1980

Brown v. Brown, 495 S.W.2d 89, 92 (Mo.App.1973); Haley v. Horwitz, 290 S.W.2d 414, 418 (Mo.App.1956). … Accord, Brown, 495 S.W.2d at 92 .

Delmar Investment Co. v. Lewis

271 Mo. 317 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jun 30, 1917

[Salmon Falls Bank v. Leyser, 116 Mo. l. c. 74; Loewenthal v. McElroy, 181 Mo. App. l. c. 405.] Tax Bills As Prima Facie Evidence. II. … [Gist v. Construction Co., 224 Mo. l. c. 378; Fruin v. Meredith, 145 Mo. App. l. c. 605.]

Barrett v. Parks

352 Mo. 974 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Apr 3, 1944

Chomeau v. Roth (1934), 230 Mo. App. 709 , 718, 72 S.W.2d 997 , 999 [4, 5]; Goben v. Murrell (1916), 195 Mo. App. 104 , 109, 190 S.W. 986, 988 ; Hall v. … Consult Commonwealth v. Jones, 12 Pa. 365 , 371. [3] Hastings Patrick Cox . The Board of Election Commissioners appealed from a judgment establishing Mr. Cox's voting residence at 2861 North Grand boulevard.

Camp v. Byrne

41 Mo. 525 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Oct 15, 1867

The commissioners named in the charter called a meeting for the election of the first board of directors in the city of St. Louis. . A board was elected and proceeded to do business under the charter. … I acted under the direction of the board of directors in doing it.

Bond v. Weiner

346 Mo. 258 · Supreme Court of Missouri · May 7, 1940

[Morton v. St. Louis-San Francisco Ry. Co., 323 Mo. 929 , 20 S.W.2d 34 , l.c. 41; Gray v. Columbia Terminals Co. et al., 331 Mo. 73 , 52 S.W.2d 809 ; Kramer v. Grand Nat. Bank, 336 Mo. 1022 , 81 S.W.2d 961 , l.c. 967.] … The cases cited and to which reference is made are Brennan v. City of St. Louis, 92 Mo. 482 , 2 S.W. 481 ; Bailey v. Kansas City, 189 Mo. 503 , 87 S.W. 1182 ; Wagner v. Gilsonite Construction Co.

Stewart ex rel. Ashley v. Ball's Administrator

33 Mo. 154 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Oct 15, 1862

Grantham, a certain brown mare claimed by Ashley, as his property, in trust for the separate use of Mrs. Grantham, wife of the execution debtor. The action was to recover the value of the mare. … (Allison v. Bowles, 8 Mo. 346 .) The property in controversy being the product of a mare conveyed by the deed, the title to it is in the same condition as is that of the mare herself.

State v. Blankenship

830 S.W.2d 1 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Apr 21, 1992

At that point Rose Brown went to the safe and with some effort managed to get the combination to work and opened the safe. Meyers directed Brown to give the gunman a plastic National Supermarket bag. … Brown v. State, 404 S.W.2d 179, 185 (Mo.1966); State v. Williams, 309 Mo. 155 , 274 S.W. 427, 430 (1925); State v. Hack, 118 Mo. 92 , 23 S.W. 1089, 1091 (1893); State v.

Stoessel v. St. Louis Public Service Co.

269 S.W.2d 41 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jun 14, 1954

When plaintiff was about to board, the door suddenly closed and the car went forward immediately into the curved portion of the track leading into Devonshire. … Sauer v. Winkler, Mo.Sup., 263 S.W.2d 370, 374 [2], And that a defendant is entitled to an instruction based upon any theory supported by the evidence considered in the light most favorable to defendant. Robb v. St.

Lewis v. Gibbons

80 S.W.3d 461 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Aug 5, 2002

Endicott v. Display Technologies, Inc., 77 S.W.3d 612 (Mo. banc 2002); Owens v. … SSM Health Care v.

Cole v. Parker-Washington Co.

276 Mo. 220 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Dec 19, 1918

[Tooker v. Leake, 146 Mo. l. c. 430; Crossland v. Admire, 149 Mo. l. c. 656; Parker v. Burton, 172 Mo. 85 ; Cummings v. Brown, 181 Mo. 711 ; Kelly v. Murdagh, 184 Mo. 377 ; Land Co. v. … [Wellshear v. Kelly, 69 Mo. 343 ; Brown v. Walker, 85 Mo. 262 .]

State v. Morgan

592 S.W.2d 796 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jan 15, 1980

The test was reaffirmed in Brown v. … See, Harris v. State, 558 P.2d 1199 (Okl.Cr. 1977) and Harris v. Oklahoma, 439 U.S. 970 , 99 S.Ct. 465 , 58 L.Ed.2d 431 (dissenting opinion by Brennan, J.) (1978). In either event, Brown v.

State v. Pitchford

324 S.W.2d 684 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jun 8, 1959

State v. Pierson, 337 Mo. 475 , 85 S.W.2d 48 . … State v. Wells, Mo.Sup., 305 S.W.2d 457 . At another point in the argument the circuit attorney referred to the defendant as being “all dressed up in a brown suit.”

Mendenhall v. Property & Casualty Insurance Co. of Hartford

375 S.W.3d 90 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jul 31, 2012

Similarly, Brown v. Ind. Ins. … Tickle, 99 S.W.3d at 29-30 ; accord, Brown v. Ind. Ins.

Kellogg v. Murphy

349 Mo. 1165 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Sep 8, 1942

All concur. 1 Jones v. Williams, 139 Mo. 1, 25 , 39 S. W. 486, 490 ; Brown v. Citizens’ State Bank, 345 Mo. 480, 488 , 134 S. W. (2d) 116, 121 ; New Haven Metal & Heating Sup. Co. v. … Jur., sec. 480, p. 147, secs. 624, 625, pp. 316, 317; State v. Shelby, 333 Mo. 1036, 1047 , 64 S. W. (2d) 269, 273 (11); O’Donnell v. Wells, 323 Mo. 1170, 1178 , 21 S. W. (2d) 762, 766 ; Brown v.

Home Builders Ass'n of Greater Kansas City v. City of Kansas City

555 S.W.2d 832 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Sep 12, 1977

Flora Realty & Investment Co. v. City of Ladue, 362 Mo. 1025, 1040 , 246 S.W.2d 771, 778 (banc 1952); Euclid v. Ambler Realty Co., supra. … Euclid v. Ambler Realty Co., supra, 272 U.S. 365, at 397 , 47 S.Ct. 114 ; Collis v. City of Bloomington, 246 N.W.2d 19, 27-28 (Minn.1976); and State ex rel. Noland v. St. Louis County, supra.

State Ex Rel. Wayne County v. Hackmann

304 Mo. 478 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jul 3, 1924

In State ex rel. v. … Gordon, 242 Mo. l. c. 623, Brown, J., largely based his ruling that designation of polling places was not necessary upon the absence from the then existing *487 statute of any direction “that notice shall he given of the

Hund v. Rackliffe

192 Mo. 312 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Dec 21, 1905

[Barber Asphalt Co. v. French, 158 Mo. 534 ; Heman v. Allen, 156 Mo. 534 ; Hill v. Swingley, 159 Mo. 45; City of Springfield to use v. Weaver, 137 Mo. 650 .] II. … App. 357 ; Sparks v. Land Co., 99 Mo. App. 489 ; Jenkins v. Stetler, 118 Ind. 275 ), and the rule here laid down is within the spirit and meaning of the decision of this court in Neill v. Gates, 152 Mo. l. c. 592.