Case law

City of Springfield v. Director of Revenue

659 S.W.2d 782 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Nov 22, 1983

At stake in this proceeding is the Director of Revenue’s right legally to assess a sales tax on the City of Springfield’s (City) revenues from certain park board activities. … Louis Country Club v.

Ex Parte McKean

338 Mo. 597 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Mar 18, 1936

[State v. Brown, 153 Mo. 578 , 55 S. W. 76 .] Of course, the statement that unless there is an “existing law” condemning the act, habeas corpus is a proper remedy, must be taken with reference to the facts of said case. … The question under consideration has been ruled in Horner v. United States, 143 U. S. 570 , 36 L. Ed. 266 , 12 Sup. Ct. 520.

Madison County Bank v. Suman's Administrator

79 Mo. 527 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Oct 15, 1883

In Brown v. Langlois, 70 Mo. 226 , the return recited: “at the usual place of abode when in the city of Cape Girardeau.” … Brown v. Langlois, supra, 227 ; Reeves v. Reeves, 33 Mo. 28 . It is as much a part of the record as the pleadings and the judgment in the case. Bateson v. Clark, 37 Mo. 31 ; Richardson v. George, 34 Mo. 108 , and note.

State ex rel. Allen v. Vaughan

99 Mo. 332 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Oct 15, 1889

This case, in this respect, is unlike that of Perryman v. Bethune, 89 Mo. 159 . … The legislature, in speaking hereof “aboard of education,” manifestly has reference to boards authorized to be formed under that name by prior general laws.

State v. Corrigan

262 Mo. 195 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Nov 24, 1914

[State v. Adams, 179 Mo. 334 ; State v. Richardson, 117 Mo. 586 ; State v. Knost, 207 Mo. 18 ; State v. Beverly, 201 Mo. 550 ; State v. Baldwin, 214-Mo. l. c. 308.] … J., and Brown, J., concur.

Maran-Cooke, Inc. v. Purler Excavating, Inc.

585 S.W.2d 38 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jun 29, 1979

V, § 3. … Goodner v. Mosker-Roe Abstract & Guaranty Co., 314 Mo. 151 , 282 S.W. 698 (1926); Herbert & Brooner Constr. Co. v. Golden, 499 S.W.2d 541 (Mo.App.1973).

Hedrick v. Hedrick

350 Mo. 716 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Feb 2, 1943

Bross et al. v. Rogers et al. (Mo. Sup.), 187 S.W. 38 . In Stubblefield v. … Curtis et al. v. Alexander et al. (Mo. Sup.), 257 S.W. 432 , l.c. 437; McFarland et al. v. Brown (Mo. Sup.), 193 S.W. 800 , l.c. 804; Jones v. Thomas et al., 218 Mo. 508 , l.c. 538, 117 S.W. 1177 .

Feurt v. Caster

174 Mo. 289 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Apr 1, 1903

[Blanton v. Jamison, 3 Mo. 52 ; Smith’s Admr. v. Rollins, 25 Mo. 408 ; Brown v. Langlois, 70 Mo. 226 ; Madison County Bank v. Suman, 79 Mo. 527 ; Laney v. Sweeney, 105 Mo. 360 ; Williams v. Monroe, 125 Mo. 574 .] … [Citing Bank v. Suman, 79 Mo. 538 ; Brown v. Langlois, 70 Mo. 226 ; Blodgett v. Schaffer, 94 Mo. 652 .]

Condemnation of Property in East Park District v. Dougherty

361 Mo. 829 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Feb 12, 1951

Goodnow v. Police Com’rs, 80 Mo. … City of Kansas City v. Hill, 80 Mo. 523, 534-5 (1); State ex rel. Kansas City v. Field, 99 Mo. 352 , 12 SW. 802; Kansas City v. Marsh Oil Co., 140 Mo. 458, 464-473 (2, 3), 41 SW. 943, 947(2, 3); Troost Ave. Cemetery v.

Carson v. Hecke

282 Mo. 580 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jun 2, 1920

[Brown v. Brown, 67 W. Va. 251 .] Whether this is a correct statement of that learned commentator’s' meaning, may be doubtful; for the few citations given in support of his text go further. … [Brown v. Brown, 28 L. R. A. (N. S.) 125; Aydlett v. Pendleton, 32 Am. St. 776; Field v. Leiter, 125 Am. St. 997; McConnell v. Bell, 121 Tenn. 198 , 130 Am. St. 770 ; Chickamauga Trust Co. v. Lonas, *595 L. R.

Kansas City v. Marsh Oil Co.

140 Mo. 458 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jul 6, 1897

Kansas City v. Scarritt, 127 Mo. 642 ; Kansas City v. … State v. Luke, 104 Mo. 563 ; State v. Myers, 115 Mo. 394 ; State v. Sansome, 116 Mo. 1 ; Mayor, etc., v. Burns, 114 Mo. 426 .

Strozewski v. City of Springfield

875 S.W.2d 905 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Apr 26, 1994

Hagely v. Board of Educ. of Webster Groves, 841 S.W.2d 663, 668 *907 (Mo. banc 1992). … See Kish v. Chilhowee R-IV Sch. Dist., 814 S.W.2d 649, 653 (Mo.App.1991).

Gleason v. Public Safety Commission

601 S.W.2d 4 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jun 10, 1980

The Board rendered a decision to the Des Peres Board of Aldermen by memorandum dated May 14, 1973. Appellant’s attorney received a copy of the decision by mail on May 16, 1973. … V, § 10. *5 In R. B. Industries, Inc. v.

State ex rel. Bell v. St. Louis Club

26 L.R.A. 573 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Dec 4, 1894

to at least one member of its board of governors. … The affairs of said respondent have been controlled by said board of governors, and its employees have been employed and discharged by said board.

State Ex Rel. Behrens v. Crismon

354 Mo. 174 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jul 16, 1945

Russell v. State Highway Commission, 328 Mo. 942 , 42 S. W. 2d 196 . The facts not being in dispute, the issues presented are questions of law. … The officers are the mere servants or agents of the corporaláon. ” Welch v. Ste. Genevieve, 1 Dill. (U. S.) 130.

T. J. Moss Tie Co. v. State Tax Commission

345 S.W.2d 191 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Apr 10, 1961

See Foley Brothers, Inc. v. Commonwealth, Pa.Sup., 400 Pa. 584 , 163 A.2d 80, 84 [5-7]; Feldman v. Board of Pharmacy of Dist. of Columbia, D.C.Mun.App., 160 A.2d 100, 102 [3]; City of Asbury Park v. … Federal Communications Commission, 104 U.S.App.D.C. 126 , 259 F.2d 941 ; New Jersey State Board of Optometrists v. Nemitz, 21 N.J. Super. 18 , 90 A.2d 740, 748 [13].

State ex rel. Major v. Ryan

232 Mo. 77 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Dec 31, 1910

[State ex rel. v. Fort, 210 Mo. l. c. 532, et seq.'] … [State ex rel. v. Shields, 4 Mo. App. 259 .] The idea of unity in the judicial system is instructively dealt with by our Brother Valliant in Zellars v. Surety Co., 210 Mo. l. c. and 106 (q. v.). (4).

State ex rel. Auto Finance Co. v. Collins

496 S.W.2d 827 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jul 16, 1973

Louis Union Trust Co. et al. v. … Rallo Contracting Co. v. Blong, et al., 313 S.W.2d 734 (Mo.App.1960); State ex rel. Associated Transport Corporation v. Godfrey, 464 S.W.2d 776 (Mo.App.1971) and Blackburn Motor Co. v.

Humphreys v. Lundy

37 Mo. 320 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Feb 15, 1866

Pl. 127, 299; McGill v. Perigo, 9 J. R. 259.) It is not the commencement of an action to which the statute of limitations can be pleaded. (Brown v. Byrd, 5 Eng., Ark., 533; Evans v. White, 7 Eng., Ark., 33.) … (Randolph v. Randolph, 3 Rand. 490 ; Gee v. Hamilton, 6 Mumf. 32.)

State v. Anderson

620 S.W.2d 378 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Sep 8, 1981

State v. … Accord, State v. Alexander, 620 S.W.2d 380 (Mo. banc 1981).