Case law

Thompson v. Chicago, Santa Fe & California Railway Co.

110 Mo. 147 · Supreme Court of Missouri · May 23, 1892

This seems to be an appropriate, if not the proper, course to pursue where an incumbrancer is made a party to a condemnation proceeding. 1 Jones on Mortgages [4 Ed.] sec. 681a; Goodrich v. Board, 45 Alb. Law Jour. … Railroad v. Brown, 12 L. R. A. 84, and notes.

Sperry Corp. v. Wiles

695 S.W.2d 471 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Aug 7, 1985

For instance, when a taxpayer does not question the valuation of his property, but asserts it is not subject to the tax, he need not appear before the Board of Equalization but may enjoin the enforcement of the tax. … It is difficult to visualize how the opinion in that case could influence the appellant not to appeal the 1982 assessment of its personal property to the Board of Equalization and the State Tax Commission.

Ashburn v. Ayres

28 Mo. 75 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jan 15, 1859

In the case of Gaty, McCune & Glasby v. Brown, 11 Mo. 138 , the terms of the statute conferring jurisdiction on the court of common pleas of St. … This precise point was determined in the case of Wibbing v. Powers, 25 Mo. 599 . Ayres was the real debtor. He made the contract for the materials furnished and was the only person who could defend the plaintiff’s suit.

State v. Napolis

436 S.W.2d 645 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Feb 10, 1969

In the recent case of Kibby v. … In State v.

City of Louisiana v. Lang

251 Mo. 664 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jun 28, 1913

[Long v. Long, 96 Mo. 180 ; Merrill v. Central Trust Co., 46 Mo. App. 1 . c. 244.] … Brown, C., concurs. PER . CURIAM. — The foregoing opinion of Blair, C., is adopted as the opinion of the court. All the judges concur.

State ex rel. Vastine v. McDonald

38 Mo. 529 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Oct 15, 1866

A later statute, which is general and affirmative, does not abrogate a former, which is particular, without negative words are used, or unless the two acts are irreconcilably inconsistent—Deters v. … Renick, 37 Mo. 597 ; Dwar. 532; Brown v. County Court, 21 Penn. Stat. 37 ; O’Neil v. Commonwealth, id. 427.

Draper v. Louisville Nashville Railroad Co.

348 Mo. 886 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jun 12, 1941

Co. v. … Co. v.

Sears v. Stone County

105 Mo. 236 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Apr 15, 1891

Watkins v. … State v. Roberts, 60 Mo. 402 ; State v. Roberts, 62 Mo. 388 ; Cole Co. v. Dallmeyer, 101 Mo. 57 ; State v. McGonigle, 101 Mo. 353 .

Fullerton v. Fullerton

345 Mo. 216 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Nov 3, 1939

Defendants’ counsel, to sustain his objection, cited to the trial court the following cases: Warfield v. Hume, 91 Mo. App. 541 ; Rice v. Shipley, 159 Mo. 399 , 60 S. W. 740 , and Curd v. Brown, 148 Mo. 82 , 49 S. … Brown, supra, does sustain defendants’ contention, but it was expressly overruled by this court in Weiermueller v. Scullin, 203 Mo. 466 , 101 S. W. 1088 , and, so far as we know, has not been followed since.

O'Bryan v. Kinney

74 Mo. 125 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Oct 15, 1881

Co. v. M. & C. R. R. *127 Co., 72 N. Y. 93 ; s. c., 28 Am. Rep. 113 . To the same effect are Long v. N. Y. Cent. R. R. Co., 50 N. Y. 76 ; Belger v. Dinsmore, 51 N. Y. 166 ; Steers v. Liverpool, etc., S. S. Co., 51 N. … Long v. N. Y. C. R. R. Co., 50 N. Y. 76 ; Snider v. Adams Ex. Co., 63 Mo. 377 ; Grace v. Adams, 100 Mass. 507 ; s. c., 1 Am. Rep. 131 ; Belger v. Dinsmore, 51 N. Y. 166 ; s. c., 10 Am. Rep. 575 . 2^-^ — principal denos.

Kellogg v. Murphy

349 Mo. 1165 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Sep 8, 1942

All concur. 1 Jones v. Williams, 139 Mo. 1, 25 , 39 S. W. 486, 490 ; Brown v. Citizens’ State Bank, 345 Mo. 480, 488 , 134 S. W. (2d) 116, 121 ; New Haven Metal & Heating Sup. Co. v. … Jur., sec. 480, p. 147, secs. 624, 625, pp. 316, 317; State v. Shelby, 333 Mo. 1036, 1047 , 64 S. W. (2d) 269, 273 (11); O’Donnell v. Wells, 323 Mo. 1170, 1178 , 21 S. W. (2d) 762, 766 ; Brown v.

Sone v. Williams

130 Mo. 530 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Nov 19, 1895

Coglan v. *556 Beard, 67 Cal. 303 ; People ex rel. v. Livingston, 79 N. Y. 287 ; Ex Parte Brown, 97 Cal. 83. The supreme court of Kansas in Hudson v. … A close reading of People ex rel. v. Livingston, 79 N. Y. 279, and Hudson v.

Kansas City Power & Light Co. v. Riss

312 S.W.2d 846 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Apr 14, 1958

The court said, “We do not think our language in Board of Trustees of Park College v. … Bauer v. City of Berkeley, Mo.Sup., 278 S.W.2d 772 ; Koch v. Board of Regents, etc., Mo.Sup., 256 S.W.2d 785 .

State v. Bazadier

362 S.W.2d 603 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Nov 14, 1962

State v. Brown, Mo., 245 S.W.2d 866 . In addition, the offense of robbery in the first degree may be committed “by violence to his person, or by putting him in fear of some immediate injury to his person.” … See State v. Baker, Mo., 293 S.W.2d 900 ; State v. Roberts, Mo., 272 S.W.2d 190 ; State v. Stegall, Mo., 327 S.W.2d 900 .

Russ v. Hope

265 Mo. 637 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jul 6, 1915

[Turner v. Gregory, 151 Mo. 100 ; Vincent v. Means, 184 Mo. 327 ; Spore v. Land Co., 186 Mo. 656 ; Gillingham v. Brown, 187 Mo. 181 ; Ohlmann v. Sawmill Co., 222 Mo. 62 .] … Brown and Walker, JJ., concur; Paris, P. J., not sitting.

State v. Pinto

312 Mo. 99 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Dec 22, 1925

[State v. Owen, 259 S. W. l. c. 101, and cases cited on that point; State v. Moore, 235 S. … In the case of State v. Brown, 304 Mo. 78 , 262 S.

Schonwald v. F. Burkart Manufacturing Co.

356 Mo. 435 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Apr 21, 1947

Examples of such cases are Soule v. Bon Ami Co., 195 N. Y. S. 574, affirmed 235 N. Y. 609 , 139 N. E. 754 , where the idea for increasing profits was merely to raise prices; Masline v. New York, N. H. & H. R. … [See the instruction held sufficient in Brunner v. Stix, Baer & Fuller Co., supra.]

Dunnegan v. Gallop

369 S.W.2d 206 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jul 8, 1963

Prior to Laws 1945, pp. 945-957, §§ 1-37, Missouri had, among others a State Board of Health (Ch. 57, Art. I, RSMo 1939), a Board of Managers of the State Eleemosynary Institutions (Ch. 51, Art. … Haley v. Horwitz, Mo., 286 S.W.2d 796 [3-5]; Fowler v. Terminal Rd.

Gleason v. Public Safety Commission

601 S.W.2d 4 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jun 10, 1980

The Board rendered a decision to the Des Peres Board of Aldermen by memorandum dated May 14, 1973. Appellant’s attorney received a copy of the decision by mail on May 16, 1973. … V, § 10. *5 In R. B. Industries, Inc. v.

State Ex Inf. Pulley v. Scott

307 Mo. 250 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Mar 16, 1925

[State ex inf. v. Woods, 233 Mo. 357 ; State ex inf. v. McClain, 187 Mo. 409 ; State ex inf. v. Fleming, 158 Mo. 558 ; State ex inf. v. Fleming, 147 Mo. 12 ; State ex inf. v. Clardy, 267 Mo. 371 ; State ex rel. v. … Killam v.