Case law

Reid v. Gees

277 Mo. 556 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Mar 28, 1919

Charles, in said county, being the same land leased to me by the Board of Trustees of said Town of St. Charles, by lease dated the 1st day of July, A. … [Clemens v. Bloomfield, 19 Mo. 118 ; Combs v. Midland Transfer Co., 58 Mo. App. 112 ; Versteeg v. Longo Fruit Co., 158 Mo. App. l. c. 131; Welsh v. Fred Heim Brewing Co., 47 Mo. App. 608 ; Vallé v. Kramer, 4 Mo.

Dwyer v. Busch Properties, Inc.

624 S.W.2d 848 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Dec 14, 1981

He was instrumental in gaining approval of all plans from the respondent’s board of directors and a commitment from the board of the parent company, Anheu-ser-Busch, Inc., for a loan of $11,340,000 to complete the project … Kenton v.

Lesan Advertising Co. v. Castleman

265 Mo. 345 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jun 1, 1915

[Turner v. Railroad, 76 Mo. 261 ; Williams v. Sanders, 69 Mo. App. 608 ; Boeker v. Crescent Co., 101 *351 Mo. App. 429 ; Burden v. Hornsby, 50 Mo. 238 .] This liberality applies also to the process. [Martin v. … The foregoing opinion of Brown, C., is adopted as the opinion of the court. All the judges concur.

State Ex Rel. City of St. Louis v. Sartorius

340 Mo. 832 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Mar 24, 1937

Ry. v. Fowler, 113 Mo. 458 , 20 S. W. 1069 ; Rothan v. St. Louis, Oak Hill & C. Ry. Co., 113 Mo. 132 , 20 S. W. 892 . … Louis v. Gerhart Realty Co., 328 Mo. 103 , 40 S.

James J. Wilson, Respondents/Cross-Appellants v. City of St. Louis, and Adam Layne, Appellant/Cross-Respondent. City of St. Louis v. State of Missouri, Appellant/Cross-Respondent.

Supreme Court of Missouri · Mar 7, 2023

Sprague v. City of St. … Dodson v.

Greenabaum v. Elliott

60 Mo. 25 · Supreme Court of Missouri · May 15, 1875

Mansfield, ( 17 Mass., 394 ) involves the same principle decided in Rowe v. … Brown, 47 Id., 105.) The case here is stronger.

Municipal Acceptance Corp. v. Canole.

342 Mo. 1170 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Sep 6, 1938

The statutes do not provide for an appeal from that board. … State Board of Taxes and Assessments (1930), 8 N. J. Misc. 875, 152 Atl. 330 . 2 Weber Showcase & Fix. Co. v. Kaufman (1935), 45 Ariz. 397 , 44 Pac. (2d) 158, 159 (under statute); Automatic Voting Machine Corp. v.

Kelpe v. Kuppertz

235 Mo. 479 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jul 1, 1911

Rowse, 90 Mo. 191 ; Hewitt v. Steele, 136 Mo. 327, 334 ; Estes v. Fry, 166 Mo. 70, 81 ; Wetmore v. … PER CURIAM. — The foregoing opinion of Brown, C., is adopted as the opinion of the court. All the. judges concur.

Estate of Cupples v. Koeln

272 Mo. 465 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Dec 3, 1917

BROWN, C. This is a proceeding begun in the probate court for the city of St. … [Fosburgh v. Rogers, 114 Mo. 122 ; Hockaday v. Lynn, 200 Mo. 456 .]

Taylor v. St. Louis Public Service Co.

303 S.W.2d 608 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jun 10, 1957

Brown v. Moore, Mo.Sup., 248 S.W.2d 553 . We are aware of the case of Hufft v. Kuhn, Mo.Sup., 277 S.W.2d 552 , in which case it was held that the trial court abused its discretion in refusing to set aside the verdict. … Jones v. Pennsylvania R. Co., supra; Stokes v. Wabash R. Co., supra.

Bank of Brimson v. Graham

335 Mo. 1196 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Nov 16, 1934

Y. 550 ; Crow v. Brown, 81 Iowa, 344, 350 ; Dean v. Clark, 81 Iowa, 753 ; Fayette County v. Hancock, 83 Iowa, 694 ; Marquardt v. Mason, 87 Iowa, 136 ; Cook v. Allee, 119 Iowa, 226 ; and Surace v. Danna, 161 N. … Bank v. Carpenter, supra, and Crow v. Brown, supra, was condemned in McIntosh v. Aubrey, 185 U. S. 122 . In Recor v. Bank, 142 Mich. 479 , 7 Ann.

City of St. Charles v. St. Charles Gas Co.

353 Mo. 996 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Mar 5, 1945

Mutual Telephone Co. v. Brown, *Page 1004 323 Mo. 818 , 19 S.W.2d 1048 ; State ex rel. Danciger v. Public Service Comm., 275 Mo. 483 , 205 S.W. 36 ; State ex rel. v. Public Service Comm. of Mo. (Mo. … Danciger v. Public Service Comm., supra; State ex rel. Mutual Tel. Co. v. Brown, supra; State ex rel. v. Public Service Commission of Mo., supra; Story v. Richardson, 186 Cal. 162 , 198 P. 1057 .

Young v. Brassfield

223 S.W.2d 491 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Oct 10, 1949

No. 2 of Worth County v. Thompson, 322 Mo. 444 , 17 S.W.2d 342 , loc. cit. 344(4); State ex rel. Miller v. … Board of Education, Mo.Sup., 18 S.W.2d 26 , loc. cit. 27(3,4). [11] We do not have jurisdiction on the ground that the revenue laws of this state are involved. In State ex rel. Miller v.

Junior College District of Metropolitan Kansas City v. Mayse

433 S.W.2d 541 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Nov 12, 1968

No. 2 et al. v. … Board of Regents, Etc., Mo., 256 S.W.2d 785, 788 [5], it was held that Northwest Missouri State College is not a political subdivision of the state, and its Board of Regents as a legal entity or quasi-public corporation is

City of St. Louis v. Young

248 Mo. 346 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Feb 28, 1913

“Whatever of incongruity” (says Brown, C., in St. Louis v. Henning, 235 Mo. l. c. 51-2) “there may be in a rule which creates a conclusive presumption that the wandering vagrant who sojourns for a day in St. … From these discern all: Reno v. Fitz Jarrell, 163 Mo. l. c. 413; State v. Baty, 166 Mo. 561 ; Clay v. Publishing Company, 200 Mo. l. c. 672-3; Stark v. Zehnder, 204 Mo. l. c. 448-9; Gilchrist v.

State v. Cline

264 Mo. 416 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Mar 30, 1915

[State v. Meyers, supra.] … All the judges concur, Brown, J., in result only.

Adams Dairy Co. v. Dairy Employees Union, Local 207, of International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen, & Helpers of America

339 S.W.2d 811 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Oct 10, 1960

V, § 3, Const. of Mo. 1945, V.A.M.S. Swift & Co. v. Doe, Mo., 311 S.W.2d 15 . … . *816 813 , 75 S.Ct. 47 , 99 L.Ed. 642 ; ICy., 264 S.W.2d 250 , 35 L.R.R.M. 2709 ; Amalgamated Clothing Workers of America v. Richman Brothers, 348 U.S. 511 , 75 S.Ct. 452 , 99 L.Ed. 600 ; Grimes & Hauer Inc. v.

Gordon v. Leavis

88 Mo. 378 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Oct 15, 1885

The case of Rogers v. Brown, 61 Mo. 187 , is to the same effect. In the case of Cape Girardeau County v. … Murphy, 33 Mo. 184 and Billon et al. v.

Lewis v. Brubaker

322 Mo. 52 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Mar 2, 1929

In Mott v. … This distinguishes the case at bar in this respect, from Dudley v. Clark, supra. Finally, the record enumerates some thirty or more business activities by the Board of Trustees.

Cloud v. Inhabitants of the Town of Pierce City

86 Mo. 357 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Apr 15, 1885

Mi ckel v. Hicks, 19 Kan. 578 ; Mayfield v. Ben nett, 48 Iowa, 194 . The case of Rumfelt v. … The case of Dunham v.