Case law

Heller v. Lutz

254 Mo. 704 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Feb 10, 1914

Rep. 700 ; 19 Cyc. 1451), rents (Brown v. Brown, 33 N. J. Eq. 650, 659; Van Wicklen v. Paulson, 14 Barb. [N. Y.] 654, 655; 3 Kent Comm. 460), and patent rights (Commonwealth v. Petty, 96 Ky. 452 , 29 L. R. A. 786). … Louis v. Weitzel, 130 Mo. l. c. 616.] Prom all of the foregoing we are of the opinion that the judgment of the trial court should be affirmed, and it is so ordered. Brown and Baris, JJ., concur; Lamm, G.

State Ex Rel. Nixon v. Powell

167 S.W.3d 702 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jul 12, 2005

State v. Brown, 140 S.W.3d 51, 55 (Mo. banc 2004). Under the facts of this case, the statutes are not vague. … Washington v. Glucksberg, 521 U.S. 702, 720-21 , 117 S.Ct. 2258 , 138 L.Ed.2d 772 (1997).

Phillips v. Presson

172 Mo. 24 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Feb 18, 1903

[Stokes v. McAlister, 2 Mo. 163 ; Jones v. Manly, 58 Mo. 559 ; State v. Moore, 61 Mo. 276 ; Brown v. Moore, 74 Mo. 633 ; Gentry v. Gentry, 122 Mo. 202 ; Fischer v. Siekmann, 125 Mo. 165 ; Carey v. West, 139 Mo. 146 .] … [Canole v. Hurt, 78 Mo. 649 ; Roberts v. Ware, 80 Mo. 363 ; Rogers v. Mayes, 84 Mo. 520 ; Rhorer v. Brockage, 86 Mo. 544 ; Hufschmidt v. Gross, 112 Mo. 649 .]

State v. Maggard

250 Mo. 335 · Supreme Court of Missouri · May 20, 1913

[State v. Hill, 65 Mo. 84 ; State v. Turner, 106 Mo. 272 ; State v. Bauerle, 145 Mo. 1 ; State v. Woolard, 111 Mo. 248 ; State v. Taylor, 134 Mo. 109 .] … Brown, P. J., and Walker, J., concur.

State v. Murray

126 Mo. 526 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Feb 12, 1895

State v. Gilmore, 110 Mo. 1 ; State ex rel. v. Hitchcock, 86 Mo. 231 ; State v. McDonald, 85 Mo. 539 ; State v. Pints, 64 Mo. 317 . … State v. Blan, 69 Mo. 317 ; State v. Burns, 99 Mo. 472 ; State v. Sundheimer, 93 Mo. 316 ; State v. Turlington, 102 Mo. 647 ; State v.

King-Willmann Ex Rel. King v. Webster Groves School District

361 S.W.3d 414 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Mar 6, 2012

Murphy v. Carrón, 536 S.W.2d 30, 32 (Mo. banc 1976). … Bd. of Health Center Trustees of Clay County v.

City of St. Louis v. Senter Commission Co.

343 Mo. 1075 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Feb 21, 1939

Co. v. … Joseph School Board ex rel. Donovon v. Hull, 72 Mo. App. 403 .] For the reasons indicated the deposit of the money in court did not stop the running of interest. The judgment is affirmed.

State Ex Rel. Worth v. Bowman

330 Mo. 1225 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Sep 2, 1932

Miller et al. v. Board of Education of Consolidated School District No. 1 of Holt County (Mo. App.), 21 S. W. (2d) 645 ; 38 C. J. p. 732 (Art. 333); 38 C. J. p. 556 (Art. 28).] … [Miller et al. v. Board of Education of Consolidated District No. 1 of Holt County, 21 S. W. (2d) 645, 648 ; 38 C. J. 556; 38 C. J. 752.] Our commissioner so held and we approve that holding.

Nelson v. Browning

391 S.W.2d 881 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jun 14, 1965

The opinion in Nelson v. Browning, Mo., 391 S.W.2d 873 , handed down concurrently herewith, controls the disposition of this case. … Under the case of Nelson v.

Tracy v. Bittle

213 Mo. 302 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jul 3, 1908

[Becker v. St. Charles, 37 Mo. 13 ; Putnam v. Walker, 37 Mo. 600 ; Rutherford v. Taylor, 38 Mo. 315 ; Price v. Thompson, 48 Mo. 365 ; Reid v. … [See Williams v. St. Louis, 120 Mo. 403 ; Brown v. City of Carthage, 128 Mo. 10 ; Railroad v. Baker, 183 Mo. 312 ; City of Columbia v. Bright, 179 Mo. 441 .] IY. Is this the proper action?

Nally v. Reading

107 Mo. 350 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Oct 15, 1891

These views are readily seen to be supported by an examination of the following authorities: Browne, Stat. Frauds, secs. 230, 231, 272, 281, 290; Taylor, Land. & Ten., sec. 427; Durand v. Curtis, 57 N. Y. 7 ; Pierce v. … Whatever may be the rule in equity as to the doctrine of part performance, that rule has no place in an action at law, as in the present instance. 3 Pars. on Cont. [7 Ed.] 60; Sharp v. Rhiel, 55 Mo. 97 .

McMahon v. Supreme Tent Knights of the Maccabees of the World

151 Mo. 522 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jul 12, 1899

Soc., sec. 434 ; Harvey v. Grand Lodge, 50 Mo. App. 472 ; Chadwick v. Triple Alliance, 56 Mo. App. 463 ; Grand Lodge v. Reneau, 75 Mo. App. 402 .] … [Hanley v. Life Ass’n, 69 Mo. 380 ; Froehlich v. Atlas Ins. Co., 47 Mo. 406 .]

City of Carondelet v. Wolfert

39 Mo. 305 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Oct 15, 1866

In the cases heretofore decided, viz., Taylor v. City of Carondelet, 22 Mo. 105 ; City of Carondelet v. Lannan, 26 Mo. 461 , and Huth’s Adm’r v. … In the cases above referred to, as well as to the additional case of Graham v.

Amos v. Southern Railway Co.

273 S.W.2d 155 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Dec 13, 1954

Co. v. Burtch, 263 U.S. 540 , 44 S.Ct. 165 , 68 L.Ed. 433 ; Hamilton v. Southern Ry. Co., 200 N.C. 543 , 158 S.E. 75 , loc. cit. 82 (1, 2); Cummings v. Illinois Central R. … See Cruce v. Gulf, Mobile & Ohio R. Co., 361 Mo. 1138 , 238 S.W.2d 674 , loc. cit. 680-682 (12,13) (14-17) (18,19) (20), and Counts v.

State ex rel. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad v. City of Kansas

89 Mo. 34 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Apr 15, 1886

Louis, 80 Mo. 379 ; and Sheehan v. The Good Samaritan Hospital, 50 Mo. 155 . … The addition of the-word damaged was evidently designed to provide for a' class of cases like the case of Gurno v. City of St.

Missouri Goodwill Industries v. Gruner

357 Mo. 647 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Mar 8, 1948

It began under the-auspices of the Methodist Church and to a limited extent is supervised by a Board' of that church, but .is governed by a board of directors which contain a Jewish Rabbi, Roman' Catholics, Presbyterians … A. v. Baumann, 344 Mo. 898 , 130 S. W. (2d) 499 .]

Brookings v. Scudder

295 Mo. 494 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Dec 6, 1922

[West v. Camden, 135 U.S. 507 ; Guernsey v. Cook, 120 Mass. 501 .] … Small, C., concurs; Brown, C., absent.

State v. Maddox

153 Mo. 471 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jan 23, 1900

[Allen v. Brown, 5 Mo. 323 ; Moran v. January, 52 Mo. 523 ; Maloney v. Railroad, 122 Mo. 106 ; St. Joseph v. Robison, 125 Mo. 1 ; St. Louis v. Boyce, 130 Mo. 572 .]

Kreuger v. Schmiechen

364 Mo. 568 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Feb 8, 1954

The question of tort liability on the part of the members of the board; was not in the case and was not mentioned. In the case of Roberts v. … It was stipulated that the liability insurance policy included within its terms the members of the board and the pastor.

State v. McGee

188 Mo. 401 · Supreme Court of Missouri · May 16, 1905

[State v. DeWitt, 152 Mo. 76 ; State v. Williams, 149 Mo. 496 .] … [State v. Berning, 91 Mo. 82 ; State v. Elvins, 101 Mo. 243 ; State v. Steptoe, 65 Mo. 640 ; State v. Robb, 90 Mo. 30 .]