Case law

Vanzant & Co. v. Hunter

1 Mo. 71 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Apr 15, 1821

This was an action of trover, brought by Vanzant & Co. v. Hunter, for eighty-six barrels of flour; plea, not guilty; issue joined and found, by the Court for the plaintiffs. … After the boat had proceeded on her way from Herculaneum, Baily came on board and took the command of the boat; when the boat and cargo arrived at St.

Heller v. Lutz

254 Mo. 704 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Feb 10, 1914

Rep. 700 ; 19 Cyc. 1451), rents (Brown v. Brown, 33 N. J. Eq. 650, 659; Van Wicklen v. Paulson, 14 Barb. [N. Y.] 654, 655; 3 Kent Comm. 460), and patent rights (Commonwealth v. Petty, 96 Ky. 452 , 29 L. R. A. 786). … Louis v. Weitzel, 130 Mo. l. c. 616.] Prom all of the foregoing we are of the opinion that the judgment of the trial court should be affirmed, and it is so ordered. Brown and Baris, JJ., concur; Lamm, G.

State Ex Rel. Nixon v. Powell

167 S.W.3d 702 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jul 12, 2005

State v. Brown, 140 S.W.3d 51, 55 (Mo. banc 2004). Under the facts of this case, the statutes are not vague. … Washington v. Glucksberg, 521 U.S. 702, 720-21 , 117 S.Ct. 2258 , 138 L.Ed.2d 772 (1997).

Phillips v. Presson

172 Mo. 24 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Feb 18, 1903

[Stokes v. McAlister, 2 Mo. 163 ; Jones v. Manly, 58 Mo. 559 ; State v. Moore, 61 Mo. 276 ; Brown v. Moore, 74 Mo. 633 ; Gentry v. Gentry, 122 Mo. 202 ; Fischer v. Siekmann, 125 Mo. 165 ; Carey v. West, 139 Mo. 146 .] … [Canole v. Hurt, 78 Mo. 649 ; Roberts v. Ware, 80 Mo. 363 ; Rogers v. Mayes, 84 Mo. 520 ; Rhorer v. Brockage, 86 Mo. 544 ; Hufschmidt v. Gross, 112 Mo. 649 .]

State v. Maggard

250 Mo. 335 · Supreme Court of Missouri · May 20, 1913

[State v. Hill, 65 Mo. 84 ; State v. Turner, 106 Mo. 272 ; State v. Bauerle, 145 Mo. 1 ; State v. Woolard, 111 Mo. 248 ; State v. Taylor, 134 Mo. 109 .] … Brown, P. J., and Walker, J., concur.

State v. Murray

126 Mo. 526 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Feb 12, 1895

State v. Gilmore, 110 Mo. 1 ; State ex rel. v. Hitchcock, 86 Mo. 231 ; State v. McDonald, 85 Mo. 539 ; State v. Pints, 64 Mo. 317 . … State v. Blan, 69 Mo. 317 ; State v. Burns, 99 Mo. 472 ; State v. Sundheimer, 93 Mo. 316 ; State v. Turlington, 102 Mo. 647 ; State v.

King-Willmann Ex Rel. King v. Webster Groves School District

361 S.W.3d 414 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Mar 6, 2012

Murphy v. Carrón, 536 S.W.2d 30, 32 (Mo. banc 1976). … Bd. of Health Center Trustees of Clay County v.

City of St. Louis v. Senter Commission Co.

343 Mo. 1075 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Feb 21, 1939

Co. v. … Joseph School Board ex rel. Donovon v. Hull, 72 Mo. App. 403 .] For the reasons indicated the deposit of the money in court did not stop the running of interest. The judgment is affirmed.

State Ex Rel. Worth v. Bowman

330 Mo. 1225 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Sep 2, 1932

Miller et al. v. Board of Education of Consolidated School District No. 1 of Holt County (Mo. App.), 21 S. W. (2d) 645 ; 38 C. J. p. 732 (Art. 333); 38 C. J. p. 556 (Art. 28).] … [Miller et al. v. Board of Education of Consolidated District No. 1 of Holt County, 21 S. W. (2d) 645, 648 ; 38 C. J. 556; 38 C. J. 752.] Our commissioner so held and we approve that holding.

State v. Maddox

153 Mo. 471 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jan 23, 1900

[Allen v. Brown, 5 Mo. 323 ; Moran v. January, 52 Mo. 523 ; Maloney v. Railroad, 122 Mo. 106 ; St. Joseph v. Robison, 125 Mo. 1 ; St. Louis v. Boyce, 130 Mo. 572 .]

Nelson v. Browning

391 S.W.2d 881 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jun 14, 1965

The opinion in Nelson v. Browning, Mo., 391 S.W.2d 873 , handed down concurrently herewith, controls the disposition of this case. … Under the case of Nelson v.

Tracy v. Bittle

213 Mo. 302 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jul 3, 1908

[Becker v. St. Charles, 37 Mo. 13 ; Putnam v. Walker, 37 Mo. 600 ; Rutherford v. Taylor, 38 Mo. 315 ; Price v. Thompson, 48 Mo. 365 ; Reid v. … [See Williams v. St. Louis, 120 Mo. 403 ; Brown v. City of Carthage, 128 Mo. 10 ; Railroad v. Baker, 183 Mo. 312 ; City of Columbia v. Bright, 179 Mo. 441 .] IY. Is this the proper action?

Amos v. Southern Railway Co.

273 S.W.2d 155 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Dec 13, 1954

Co. v. Burtch, 263 U.S. 540 , 44 S.Ct. 165 , 68 L.Ed. 433 ; Hamilton v. Southern Ry. Co., 200 N.C. 543 , 158 S.E. 75 , loc. cit. 82 (1, 2); Cummings v. Illinois Central R. … See Cruce v. Gulf, Mobile & Ohio R. Co., 361 Mo. 1138 , 238 S.W.2d 674 , loc. cit. 680-682 (12,13) (14-17) (18,19) (20), and Counts v.

Drolshagen v. Union Depot Railroad

186 Mo. 258 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Feb 15, 1905

[Roberts v. Railroad, 43 Mo. App. 287 ; Enterprise Soap Works v. Sayers, 51 Mo. App. 310 ; Brownell v. Railroad, 47 Mo. 243 ; Brady v. Connelly, 52 Mo. 19 ; St. Louis to use v. Allen, 53 Mo. 49 ; Owens v. … Railroad, 58 Mo. 386 , l. c. 394; Rinard v. Railroad, 164 Mo. 270 , l. c. 284.]

City of Carondelet v. Wolfert

39 Mo. 305 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Oct 15, 1866

In the cases heretofore decided, viz., Taylor v. City of Carondelet, 22 Mo. 105 ; City of Carondelet v. Lannan, 26 Mo. 461 , and Huth’s Adm’r v. … In the cases above referred to, as well as to the additional case of Graham v.

State ex rel. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad v. City of Kansas

89 Mo. 34 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Apr 15, 1886

Louis, 80 Mo. 379 ; and Sheehan v. The Good Samaritan Hospital, 50 Mo. 155 . … The addition of the-word damaged was evidently designed to provide for a' class of cases like the case of Gurno v. City of St.

Missouri Goodwill Industries v. Gruner

357 Mo. 647 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Mar 8, 1948

It began under the-auspices of the Methodist Church and to a limited extent is supervised by a Board' of that church, but .is governed by a board of directors which contain a Jewish Rabbi, Roman' Catholics, Presbyterians … A. v. Baumann, 344 Mo. 898 , 130 S. W. (2d) 499 .]

State v. Hammer

333 Mo. 40 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jun 24, 1933

[State v. Hammer, 56 S. W. (2d) 415 .] … [State v. Brown, 304 Mo. 78 , 262 S. W. 710 .]

State ex rel. Berkley v. McClain

187 Mo. 409 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Mar 15, 1905

.” *415 This is the general rule and it was recognized in State ex inf. v. Fleming, 147 Mo. 1 . … V.

Kreuger v. Schmiechen

364 Mo. 568 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Feb 8, 1954

The question of tort liability on the part of the members of the board; was not in the case and was not mentioned. In the case of Roberts v. … It was stipulated that the liability insurance policy included within its terms the members of the board and the pastor.