Case law

School District No. 3 v. Oellien

209 Mo. 464 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Feb 26, 1908

[State ex rel. v. Sutterfield, 54 Mo. 391 ; State ex rel. v. Brassfield, 67 Mo. 331 ; State ex rel. v. Mayor, 73 Mo. 435 .] The case of State v. … [State ex rel. v. Mayor, 73 Mo. 437 ; State ex rel. v. Francis, 95 Mo. 44 ; State ex rel. v.

Sears v. Stone County

105 Mo. 236 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Apr 15, 1891

Watkins v. … State v. Roberts, 60 Mo. 402 ; State v. Roberts, 62 Mo. 388 ; Cole Co. v. Dallmeyer, 101 Mo. 57 ; State v. McGonigle, 101 Mo. 353 .

Crest Communications v. Kuehle

754 S.W.2d 563 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jul 26, 1988

V, § 3. We reverse and remand. … Council Apartments, Inc. v.

Hodges v. Runyan

30 Mo. 491 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jul 15, 1860

, and that, by the authority and on behalf of said board, he, as such trustee and president of the board, executed said note for the consideration mentioned, and that said note, when given, was expressly understood between … See the case of Tutt v. Hobbs, 17 Mo. 488 . •Judgment reversed and the cause remanded; the other judges concurring.

State v. Green

470 S.W.2d 565 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Sep 13, 1971

Johnson v. … See also: State v. St.

Cochran v. Thompson

347 Mo. 649 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Mar 13, 1941

[Yakubinis v. M.-K.-T. Ry. *Page 656 Co., 345 Mo. 943 , 137 S.W.2d 504 ; see also English v. Wabash Ry. Co., 341 Mo. 550 , 108 S.W.2d 51 ; Crossno v. Terminal Railroad Assn., 333 Mo. 733 , 62 S.W.2d 1092 ; Frye v. St. … [See Trigg v. W., L. T. Co., 215 Mo. 521 , 114 S.W. 972 ; Ayers v. Wabash Ry. Co., 190 Mo. 228 , 88 S.W. 608 ; Carpenter v. Kurn, 345 Mo. 877 , 136 S.W.2d 997 .]

State v. Edmonson

371 S.W.2d 273 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Oct 14, 1963

See State v. Brown, Mo.Sup., 291 S.W.2d 615 ; State v. Humphrey, 358 Mo. 904, 217 S.W.2d 551, 553 ; Hanser v. Bieber, 271 Mo. 326 , 197 S.W. 68 . … State v. Brown, Mo.Sup., 332 S.W.2d 904, 910 . We hold that all of the instructions, read and considered together, properly presented the law of the case and that defendant was not prejudiced by the omission noted.

State v. Sattley

131 Mo. 464 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Dec 3, 1895

Proc. [3 Ed.], secs. 315-333; Hamuel v. State, 5 Mo. 261 ; Com. v. Simpson, 9 Met. 141 ; State v. Adams, 108 Mo. 208 . … State v. Carlisle, 57 Mo. 102 ; State v. Brown, 104 Mo. 365 ; State v. Wisdom, 119 Mo. 539 . The ninth and tenth instructions directed the jury that if Mrs.

In re Laclede School of Law

700 S.W.2d 81 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Apr 30, 1985

Perhaps the Board of Curators of the University of Missouri could explore the possibility of establishing such a school at the University of Missouri at St. … The case of Sweatt v.

Dorris Motor Car Co. v. Colburn

307 Mo. 137 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Mar 12, 1925

[State ex rel. v. Miller, 100 Mo. 439 ; State ex rel. v. Draper, 47 Mo. 29 ; Geisen v. Heiderich, 104 Ill. 537 ; Anderson v. Commonwealth, 18 Gratt. (Va.) 295; Poe v. … In Doe Run Lead Co. v.

State Ex Rel. Globe-Democrat Publishing Co. v. Gehner

316 Mo. 694 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Feb 15, 1927

The relator thereupon appealed to the *696 Board of Equalization of the city of St. … Goodloe v. Wurdeman, 286 Mo. l. c. 161; State v. Smith, 223 Mo. l. c. 257; Nat. Bank v. Ripley, 161 Mo. l. c. 131 and cases; Mears Mining Co. v. Maryland Cas. Co., 162 Mo. App. l. c. 178; State v. Broderick, 7 Mo.

City of St. Louis v. Cavanaugh

357 Mo. 204 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Dec 8, 1948

Kansas City v. … Kansas City v. White, 69 Mo. 26 ; 37 Am. Jur. 834 , Municipal Corps., Sec. 197. The members of the Board of Aldermen could not bind their successors in office with reference to the matter of tolls or no tolls. 50 Am.

State Ex Rel. McCrate v. Rhodes

349 Mo. 1071 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jul 28, 1942

V. Conran on July 20, 1942. … V.

Dooley v. City of Kansas

82 Mo. 444 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Oct 15, 1884

To-the contrary, are Hunt v. Boonville, 65 Mo. 620 ; Thompson v. Boonville, 61 Mo. 283 and Soulard v. St. Louis, 36 Mo. 546 . In the latter case the city of St. … Boonville, are approvingly, cited in ffhe opinion and the opinion delivered in Hunt v. Boonville *447 was written "by the same judge who delivered the opinion in Rowland v. City of Gallatin.

508 Chestnut, Inc. v. City of St. Louis

389 S.W.2d 823 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Apr 12, 1965

State, on Inf. of Taylor v. Currency Services, 358 Mo. 983 , 218 S.W.2d 600, 604 ; Petitt v. Field, Mo.Sup., 341 S.W.2d 106, 110 . … City of Washington v.

State v. Polakoff

361 Mo. 929 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Mar 12, 1951

Appellant complains because the trial court permitted the State to indorse the name of Lloyd Brown on the information during the trial and to use Brown as a witness. … State v. Lindsey, 80 S.

St. Louis Housing Authority v. City of St. Louis

361 Mo. 1170 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Apr 19, 1951

Co. v. St. … Co. v.

State v. Washington

357 S.W.2d 92 · Supreme Court of Missouri · May 14, 1962

Assault and Battery § 128(d), p. 1005; State v. Allen (Mo.), 343 S.W.2d 63 ; State v. Spradlin, 363 Mo. 940 , 254 S.W.2d 660 ; State v. Brown (Mo.), 245 S.W.2d 866 ; State v. Johnson, 326 Mo. 1030 , 33 S.W.2d 912 . … State v. Brown (Mo.), 245 S.W.2d 866 ; State v. Henggeler, 312 Mo. 15 , 278 S.W. 743 ; 58 A.L.R., l. c. 818.

Dwyer v. Busch Properties, Inc.

624 S.W.2d 848 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Dec 14, 1981

He was instrumental in gaining approval of all plans from the respondent’s board of directors and a commitment from the board of the parent company, Anheu-ser-Busch, Inc., for a loan of $11,340,000 to complete the project … Kenton v.

James J. Wilson, Respondents/Cross-Appellants v. City of St. Louis, and Adam Layne, Appellant/Cross-Respondent. City of St. Louis v. State of Missouri, Appellant/Cross-Respondent.

Supreme Court of Missouri · Mar 7, 2023

Sprague v. City of St. … Dodson v.