Case law

Messick v. Grainger

356 Mo. 1227 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Nov 10, 1947

Brown, judge of the circuit court of Cedar County, on his own motion, disqualified himself to sit in the cause. … Brown v. Stewart, 313 Mo. 1 , 281 S.W. 768 , l.c. 770, and cases there cited, and such being so contestant says that the general code of civil procedure has no application.

American Wine Co. v. Scholer

85 Mo. 496 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Apr 15, 1885

Ray v. Slobbs, 28 Mo. 35 ; Nelson v. Brown, 23 Mo. 13 ; Downing v. Still, Adm’r, 43 Mo. 321 . Judgment affirmed.

Drydale v. Kiser

413 S.W.2d 506 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Apr 10, 1967

While there was no proof of official board action, Walter has been on the board part of the time, the road was “graded up,” ditched and constructed by White Cloud Township employees using township graders and tractors. … Some trees were removed, ditches graded and the road built, this employee said on orders of the township board.

Kreuger v. Schmiechen

364 Mo. 568 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Feb 8, 1954

The question of tort liability on the part of the members of the board; was not in the case and was not mentioned. In the case of Roberts v. … It was stipulated that the liability insurance policy included within its terms the members of the board and the pastor.

Henry v. Manzella

356 Mo. 305 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Apr 21, 1947

Keitel v. … Execution issued upon request of the board in the same manner as executions issued upon other judgments.

Neill v. Gates

152 Mo. 585 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Dec 12, 1899

Louis to use of Murphy v. … Easton v. Canal Co., 13 Ohio, 79; Williams v. Railroad, 112 Mo. 463 , and Chapman v.

State ex rel. Musser v. Birch

186 Mo. 205 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Feb 15, 1905

Louis v. Weber, 44 Mo. 547 ; Cape Girardeau v. Riley, 72 Mo. 220 ; Kelly v. Meeks, 87 Mo. 396 ; Morse v. Westport, 110 Mo. 502 ; City of Tarkio v. Cook, 120 Mo. 1 ; Bluedorn v. Railroad, 121 Mo. 258 ; Copeland v. St. … [Kayser v. Trustees of Bremen, 16 Mo. 88 ; Inhabitants of Fredericktown v. Fox, 84 Mo. l. c. 65, and cases cited; Flynn v. Neosho, 114 Mo. l. c. 573; Kansas City v. Stegmiller, 151 Mo. l. c. 209; School District v.

State v. Bulling

105 Mo. 204 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Apr 15, 1891

State v. Hopper, 71 Mo. 425 ; State v. Talbott, 73 Mo. 347 ; State v. Ellis, 74 Mo. 207 ; State v. McGinnis, 76 Mo. 326 ; State v. Snell, 78 Mo. 240 ; State v. Nelson, 88 Mo. 126 ; State v. … V.

State Ex Rel. Cole v. Trimble

307 Mo. 57 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Feb 17, 1925

It is contended by relators that this ruling is in conflict with Union National Bank v. Lyons, 220 Mo. l.c. 554. … It was argued in the Court of Appeals that since the certificate was made payable to "Mark V.

Howland v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co.

134 Mo. 474 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jun 2, 1896

Hunt v. Hunt, 72 N. Y. 217 ; Hagerman v. Sutton, 91 Mo. 519 , and cases cited; Works, Courts & Jurisdict., sec. 8, pp. 18, 19, et seq.; Brown, Jurisdict., secs. 1, Ia; Freeman, Judgments [4 Ed.], secs. 135, 136. … Caldwell, 1 Yeates, 274 , and other cases; South Carolina, Mars v. Ins, Co., 17 S. C. 514; Michigan, Near v. Mitchell, 23 Mich. 382 ; Iowa, Clise v. Freeborne, 27 Iowa, 280 ; Maryland, Brown v.

State v. Emrich

361 Mo. 922 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Mar 12, 1951

V, Sec. 15], See also State v. Massey, 358 Mo. 1108, 1115 (2), 219 SW. (2d) 326, 328 (3, 4). We hold Judge Maughmer had jurisdiction to try the case. … The Rouner case has very recently been followed by this Division in State v. Paul McGoldrick, 361 Mo. 737 , 236 SW. (2d) 306 .

State ex rel. Cleaveland v. Bond

518 S.W.2d 649 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jan 13, 1975

In Lamb v. Board of County Peace Officers Retirement Commission, supra, under a constitutional provision substantially the same as our Art. … Board of Education, 171 N.Y. 263 , 63 N.E. 1107 (1902); Lamb v. Board of County Peace Officers Retirement Commission, 29 Cal.App.2d 348 , 84 P.2d 183 (1938); Littleton v. Reed, 456 S.W.2d 695 (Ky.1970); People v.

Moore v. Wilkerson

169 Mo. 334 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jun 18, 1902

S. 1889, sec. 5435; Peake v. Cameron, 102 Mo. 568 ; Davis v. Land, 88 Mo. 436 ; Bank v. Guthrey, 127 Mo. 189 ; Macke v. Byrd, 131 Mo. l. c. 691; Ratliff v. Graves, 132 Mo. 76 ; Bank v. Brown, 165 Mo. 32 .] … [Bank v. Brown, 165 Mo. 32 .] Por, “no fraud upon creditors can be perpetrated by any disposition the *338 debtor may see proper to make of his homestead.

Williams v. Schaff

282 Mo. 497 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jun 2, 1920

Co. v. Zachary, 232 U. … [Foster v. Railroad, 115 Mo. 165 ; see, too, York v. Railroad, 117 Mo. 405 ; Herdler v. Stove & Range Co., 136 Mo. 3 .] Commerce. II.

Stock v. Schloman

322 Mo. 1209 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jun 4, 1929

Corbett v. Brown (Mo. … The prayer for cancellation of the mortgage is still no more than an effort "to put a judicial end to its lien," as said in Corbett v. Brown, supra.

Finck v. Schneider Granite Co.

187 Mo. 244 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Mar 15, 1905

[Morris Run Coal Co. v. Barclay Coal Co., 68 Pa. St. 173; Crawford v. Wick, 18 Ohio St. 190 ; Bennett v. Dutton, 10 N. H. 481; *269 White v. Hunter, 23 N. H. 134; Weld v. Lancaster, 56 Me. 453 .] … “The case of Gill v.

State v. Peak

85 Mo. 190 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Oct 15, 1884

State v. Blan, 69 Mo. 317 ; State *. Williams, 77 Mo. 310 : State v. Burnett, 81 Mo. 119 . II. … The seventh instruction has been sanctioned by this court in the following cases, and was not erroneous: State v. Linney, 52 Mo. 40 ; State v. Underwood, 57 Mo. 40; State v. Brown, 64 Mo. 367 .

Sperry Corp. v. Wiles

695 S.W.2d 471 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Aug 7, 1985

For instance, when a taxpayer does not question the valuation of his property, but asserts it is not subject to the tax, he need not appear before the Board of Equalization but may enjoin the enforcement of the tax. … It is difficult to visualize how the opinion in that case could influence the appellant not to appeal the 1982 assessment of its personal property to the Board of Equalization and the State Tax Commission.

Keithley v. May

29 Mo. 220 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Oct 15, 1859

In the case of Brown v. Pearson, 8 Mo. 159 , it was held that the dismissing of the action as to some of the parties was a matter of practice resting in the discretion of the court. … The same principle was maintained in the case of Minor v. The Mechanics’ Bank of Alexandria, 1 Pet. 59 .

Faris v. Moore

256 Mo. 123 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Mar 24, 1914

Brown, 61 Mo. 187 ); actions to assign dower when such dower is held by an adverse claimant (Robinson v. Ware, 94 Mo. *131 678 ). … App. l. c. 303; Loomis v. Mo. Pacific Ry. Co., 165 Mo. 469 ; Hunter v. Hunter, 50 Mo. 445 ; Newton v. Rebenack, 90 Mo. App. 650 ; White v. Pendry, 25 Mo. App. 542 ; Stark v. Zehnder, 204 Mo. 442 ; and Elliott v.