Case law

Wright v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad Co.

392 S.W.2d 401 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jul 12, 1965

He had never seen that type of work done upon cold metal with a couple of boards. … Brock v. Mobile & Ohio R. Co., 330 Mo. 918 , 51 S.W.2d 100 ; Goslin v. Kurn, 351 Mo. 395 , 173 S.W.2d 79 .

Drydale v. Kiser

413 S.W.2d 506 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Apr 10, 1967

While there was no proof of official board action, Walter has been on the board part of the time, the road was “graded up,” ditched and constructed by White Cloud Township employees using township graders and tractors. … Some trees were removed, ditches graded and the road built, this employee said on orders of the township board.

State v. Bulling

105 Mo. 204 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Apr 15, 1891

State v. Hopper, 71 Mo. 425 ; State v. Talbott, 73 Mo. 347 ; State v. Ellis, 74 Mo. 207 ; State v. McGinnis, 76 Mo. 326 ; State v. Snell, 78 Mo. 240 ; State v. Nelson, 88 Mo. 126 ; State v. … V.

Connoyer v. LaBeaume's Heirs

45 Mo. 139 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Oct 15, 1869

In Connoyer v. Washington University, the judge delivering the opinion of the court seems to recognize, without abatement,' the principle announced in Bissell v. … Penrose, 8 How. 317 , as illustrated and applied in Boon v. Moore, 14 Mo. 420 , but proceeds to say: “The cases of Bissell v. Penrose, and Boon v.

Dooley v. City of Kansas

82 Mo. 444 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Oct 15, 1884

To-the contrary, are Hunt v. Boonville, 65 Mo. 620 ; Thompson v. Boonville, 61 Mo. 283 and Soulard v. St. Louis, 36 Mo. 546 . In the latter case the city of St. … Boonville, are approvingly, cited in ffhe opinion and the opinion delivered in Hunt v. Boonville *447 was written "by the same judge who delivered the opinion in Rowland v. City of Gallatin.

Kunzler v. Estate of Kunzler

598 S.W.2d 139 · Supreme Court of Missouri · May 13, 1980

This rule was modified to some extent by Brown v. St. … Brown v. St. Louis Public Service Company, supra.

Cape Motor Lodge, Inc. v. City of Cape Girardeau

706 S.W.2d 208 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Mar 25, 1986

Relying on Enright v. … Scott v. Kempland, 264 S.W.2d 349, 355 (Mo.1954). Greater specification in this agreement would only serve to stifle the flexibility intentionally built into this governing board.

Stokes v. Stokes

1 Mo. 320 · Supreme Court of Missouri · May 15, 1823

Adultery is a good cause for divorce, from bed and board, if committed within the State, or while the injured party is domiciled within this State. Fourth. … Rep. 430 , Young v. Young. Fifth. That the cause for divorce ought to be specifically alledged in the bill, and not left to inference or presumption: 4 Mass. Rep. 506 , 586, Tourtilot v. Tourtilot, and Rumie v. Rumie.

Kerstner v. Vorweg

130 Mo. 196 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Oct 11, 1895

Garland v. Smith, 127 Mo. 567 . … Scovill v. Baldwin, 27 Conn. 318 ; Bent v. Lewis, 88 Mo. 470 . As was said by Judge Eombaueb, in Did v. Bqilroad, 37 Mo.

Rosen v. Alside, Inc.

248 S.W.2d 638 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Apr 14, 1952

Shaltupsky v. Brown Shoe Co., 350 Mo. 831 , 168 S.W.2d 1083 ; Seegers v. Marx & Haas Clothing Co., 334 Mo. 632 , 66 S.W.2d 526 . … Shaltupsky v. Brown Shoe Co., supra; Shannon v. Gaar, 233 Iowa 38 , 6 N.W.2d 304 ; 11 Am. Jur., Conspiracy, § 50, p. 582.

Kreuger v. Schmiechen

364 Mo. 568 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Feb 8, 1954

The question of tort liability on the part of the members of the board; was not in the case and was not mentioned. In the case of Roberts v. … It was stipulated that the liability insurance policy included within its terms the members of the board and the pastor.

Henry v. Manzella

356 Mo. 305 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Apr 21, 1947

Keitel v. … Execution issued upon request of the board in the same manner as executions issued upon other judgments.

State ex rel. Musser v. Birch

186 Mo. 205 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Feb 15, 1905

Louis v. Weber, 44 Mo. 547 ; Cape Girardeau v. Riley, 72 Mo. 220 ; Kelly v. Meeks, 87 Mo. 396 ; Morse v. Westport, 110 Mo. 502 ; City of Tarkio v. Cook, 120 Mo. 1 ; Bluedorn v. Railroad, 121 Mo. 258 ; Copeland v. St. … [Kayser v. Trustees of Bremen, 16 Mo. 88 ; Inhabitants of Fredericktown v. Fox, 84 Mo. l. c. 65, and cases cited; Flynn v. Neosho, 114 Mo. l. c. 573; Kansas City v. Stegmiller, 151 Mo. l. c. 209; School District v.

State v. Emrich

361 Mo. 922 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Mar 12, 1951

V, Sec. 15], See also State v. Massey, 358 Mo. 1108, 1115 (2), 219 SW. (2d) 326, 328 (3, 4). We hold Judge Maughmer had jurisdiction to try the case. … The Rouner case has very recently been followed by this Division in State v. Paul McGoldrick, 361 Mo. 737 , 236 SW. (2d) 306 .

Neill v. Gates

152 Mo. 585 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Dec 12, 1899

Louis to use of Murphy v. … Easton v. Canal Co., 13 Ohio, 79; Williams v. Railroad, 112 Mo. 463 , and Chapman v.

Moore v. Wilkerson

169 Mo. 334 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jun 18, 1902

S. 1889, sec. 5435; Peake v. Cameron, 102 Mo. 568 ; Davis v. Land, 88 Mo. 436 ; Bank v. Guthrey, 127 Mo. 189 ; Macke v. Byrd, 131 Mo. l. c. 691; Ratliff v. Graves, 132 Mo. 76 ; Bank v. Brown, 165 Mo. 32 .] … [Bank v. Brown, 165 Mo. 32 .] Por, “no fraud upon creditors can be perpetrated by any disposition the *338 debtor may see proper to make of his homestead.

Drake-O'Meara & Associates v. American Testing & Engineering Corp.

459 S.W.2d 362 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Nov 9, 1970

We do not so construe the findings of the arbitration board. … We are not authorized to make an inquiry as to whether that determination of the arbitration board was right or wrong. Drake-O’Meara seeks indemnity; not contribution. See McDonnell Aircraft Corp. v.

Stock v. Schloman

322 Mo. 1209 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jun 4, 1929

Corbett v. Brown (Mo. … The prayer for cancellation of the mortgage is still no more than an effort "to put a judicial end to its lien," as said in Corbett v. Brown, supra.

Williams v. Schaff

282 Mo. 497 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jun 2, 1920

Co. v. Zachary, 232 U. … [Foster v. Railroad, 115 Mo. 165 ; see, too, York v. Railroad, 117 Mo. 405 ; Herdler v. Stove & Range Co., 136 Mo. 3 .] Commerce. II.

State ex rel. Cleaveland v. Bond

518 S.W.2d 649 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jan 13, 1975

In Lamb v. Board of County Peace Officers Retirement Commission, supra, under a constitutional provision substantially the same as our Art. … Board of Education, 171 N.Y. 263 , 63 N.E. 1107 (1902); Lamb v. Board of County Peace Officers Retirement Commission, 29 Cal.App.2d 348 , 84 P.2d 183 (1938); Littleton v. Reed, 456 S.W.2d 695 (Ky.1970); People v.