Case law

Farris v. Burchard

262 Mo. 334 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Dec 2, 1914

[Martin v. Brown, 162 Mo. App. 223, 228 ; Dawson v. Waldheim, 89 Mo. App. 245 ; Hansbrough v. Fudge, 80 Mo. 307 ; Smith v. Steel, 81 Mo. 455 .] … [Hansbrough v. Fudge, supra; Smith v. Steel, supra.]

State v. Dixon

247 Mo. 668 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Feb 19, 1913

[State v. Feazell, 132 Mo. 176 ; State v. Gilbert, 24 Mo. 380 .] This view renders it unnecessary to consider the other questions raised. … Brown, P. </., and Walker, J., concur.

Adams Dairy, Inc. v. Burke

293 S.W.2d 281 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jul 9, 1956

Wisconsin Employment Relations Board, U.S., 76 S.Ct. 794 . In Weber v. … B. v. Peter Cailler Kohler Swiss Chocolates Co., Inc., 2 Cir., 130 F.2d 503, 506 . See also National Labor Relations Board v.

McGauley v. St. Louis Transit Co.

179 Mo. 583 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Feb 10, 1904

The point of contact between the dash board *588 and the end of the coupling pole was a little to the west of the center of the dash board. … There is nothing in this case to bring it within the doctrine of Kellny v. Railroad, 101 Mo. 67 ; Morgan v. Railroad, 159 Mo. 262 ; Klockenbrink v. Railroad, 172 Mo. 678 .

St. Louis Housing Authority v. City of St. Louis

361 Mo. 1170 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Apr 19, 1951

Co. v. St. … Co. v.

Keithley v. May

29 Mo. 220 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Oct 15, 1859

In the case of Brown v. Pearson, 8 Mo. 159 , it was held that the dismissing of the action as to some of the parties was a matter of practice resting in the discretion of the court. … The same principle was maintained in the case of Minor v. The Mechanics’ Bank of Alexandria, 1 Pet. 59 .

Spitts v. Wells & Wells

18 Mo. 468 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Oct 15, 1853

The case of Louvell et al. v. Menard, 1 Gilman, 39 , is not in point, for the plaintiff. … We see no reason, whatever, for suing the defendants jointly for their board. Judge Hyland concurring, the judgment will be affirmed; Judge Gamble not sitting.

State Ex Rel. McCrate v. Rhodes

349 Mo. 1071 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jul 28, 1942

V. Conran on July 20, 1942. … V.

Toomey v. Supreme Lodge Knights of Pythias

147 Mo. 129 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Dec 13, 1898

[Knights of Pythias v. Kalinski, 163 U. S. 289 ; State ex rel. v. Miller, 66 Iowa, 26 ; State ex rel. v. Bankers’ Mut. Ben. Soc., 23 Kansas, 499; Bolton v. Bolton, 73 Me. 299 ; State ex rel. v. … Merchant’s Exchange, 72 Mo. 158 ; Masonic Aid Ass’n v. Taylor, 21 Ins. Law Journal, 695; Grimes v. N. W. Legion of Honor, 64 N. W. Rep. 806 ; State ex rel. v. National Ass’n, 35 Kansas, 51; Sherman v.

Dial v. Lathrop R-II School District

871 S.W.2d 444 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Feb 22, 1994

Fisher v. Reorganized School Dist., etc., 567 S.W.2d 647, 649 (Mo. banc 1978). … year as provided by the salary schedule adopted by the board of education applicable to all teachers. § 168.110, RSMo Supp.1993.

State ex rel. Norfolk Southern Railway Co. v. Dolan

512 S.W.3d 41 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Feb 28, 2017

Daimler, 134 S.Ct. at 754 ; Goodyear Dunlop Tires Operations, S.A. v. Brown, 564 U.S. 915, 919 , 131 S.Ct. 2846 , 180 L.Ed.2d 796 (2011). … Brown v.

Xerox Corp. v. Travers

529 S.W.2d 418 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Nov 10, 1975

Xerox appealed from the Board of Equalization to the State Tax Commission. … In Foremost Dairies, Inc. v.

Kimble v. St. Louis & Suburban Railway Co.

183 Mo. 70 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jun 20, 1904

[Ash v. Independence, 145 Mo. l. c. 126; Vaughn v. Railroad, 145 Mo. l. c. 61; State ex rel. v. Smith, 150 Mo. l. c. 82; Coleman v. Cole, 158 Mo. 253 ; Ash v. Independence, 169 Mo. 77 ; Brown v. … Railroad, 175 Mo. l. c. 188; State ex rel. v. Smith, 176 Mo. l. c. 48; State ex rel. Curtice v. Smith, 177 Mo. 69 .]

Hodges v. Runyan

30 Mo. 491 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jul 15, 1860

, and that, by the authority and on behalf of said board, he, as such trustee and president of the board, executed said note for the consideration mentioned, and that said note, when given, was expressly understood between … See the case of Tutt v. Hobbs, 17 Mo. 488 . •Judgment reversed and the cause remanded; the other judges concurring.

State Ex Rel. Globe-Democrat Publishing Co. v. Gehner

316 Mo. 694 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Feb 15, 1927

The relator thereupon appealed to the *696 Board of Equalization of the city of St. … Goodloe v. Wurdeman, 286 Mo. l. c. 161; State v. Smith, 223 Mo. l. c. 257; Nat. Bank v. Ripley, 161 Mo. l. c. 131 and cases; Mears Mining Co. v. Maryland Cas. Co., 162 Mo. App. l. c. 178; State v. Broderick, 7 Mo.

Wright v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad Co.

392 S.W.2d 401 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jul 12, 1965

He had never seen that type of work done upon cold metal with a couple of boards. … Brock v. Mobile & Ohio R. Co., 330 Mo. 918 , 51 S.W.2d 100 ; Goslin v. Kurn, 351 Mo. 395 , 173 S.W.2d 79 .

Drydale v. Kiser

413 S.W.2d 506 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Apr 10, 1967

While there was no proof of official board action, Walter has been on the board part of the time, the road was “graded up,” ditched and constructed by White Cloud Township employees using township graders and tractors. … Some trees were removed, ditches graded and the road built, this employee said on orders of the township board.

State v. Bulling

105 Mo. 204 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Apr 15, 1891

State v. Hopper, 71 Mo. 425 ; State v. Talbott, 73 Mo. 347 ; State v. Ellis, 74 Mo. 207 ; State v. McGinnis, 76 Mo. 326 ; State v. Snell, 78 Mo. 240 ; State v. Nelson, 88 Mo. 126 ; State v. … V.

Connoyer v. LaBeaume's Heirs

45 Mo. 139 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Oct 15, 1869

In Connoyer v. Washington University, the judge delivering the opinion of the court seems to recognize, without abatement,' the principle announced in Bissell v. … Penrose, 8 How. 317 , as illustrated and applied in Boon v. Moore, 14 Mo. 420 , but proceeds to say: “The cases of Bissell v. Penrose, and Boon v.

Dooley v. City of Kansas

82 Mo. 444 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Oct 15, 1884

To-the contrary, are Hunt v. Boonville, 65 Mo. 620 ; Thompson v. Boonville, 61 Mo. 283 and Soulard v. St. Louis, 36 Mo. 546 . In the latter case the city of St. … Boonville, are approvingly, cited in ffhe opinion and the opinion delivered in Hunt v. Boonville *447 was written "by the same judge who delivered the opinion in Rowland v. City of Gallatin.