Case law

Henry & Coatsworth Co. v. Evans

97 Mo. 47 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Oct 15, 1888

Such was the law of Colorado when the decision in Jensen v. Brown (1875) 2 Col. 697 , was announced. Session Laws Colorado, 1872, p. 150, sec. 6. The law of Iowa was somewhat similar when Stewart v. … Murray v. Brown, 91 U. S. 266 . A familiar illustration of the principle is found in the admiralty.

State Ex Rel. State Highway Commission v. Belvidere Development Co.

315 S.W.2d 781 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Sep 8, 1958

Co., Mo.Sup., 283 S.W.2d 474 ; Andres v. Brown, Mo.Sup., 300 S.W.2d 800 ; Schmidt v. … Dawson v. Scherff, supra.

Wingate Ex Rel. Carlisle v. Lester E. Cox Medical Center

853 S.W.2d 912 · Supreme Court of Missouri · May 25, 1993

While assessing her breathing, the paramedic slid a board into the overturned car and under her body. While on the board, she was pulled out of the auto. … In Shirrell v.

Haag v. Ward

186 Mo. 325 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Feb 15, 1905

[Brown v. Railroad, 175 Mo. 185 .] II. … [Wooten v. Walters, 110 N. C. 251 ; Mills v. Charleton, 29 Wis. 400 ; Himmelmann v. Satterlee, 50 Cal. 70 .]

State Ex Rel. Murphy v. Barrett

352 Mo. 1130 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jun 13, 1944

Louis, against respondents, as members of and constituting the Board of Election Commissioners of . said city. … The vice president of the board of aldermen shall hold the office of the president of said board during any vacancy therein, with the right of succession to the office of mayor.” (Emphasis ours.)

Neff v. City of Cameron

213 Mo. 350 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jul 3, 1908

Nearly half a century ago this court in a case argued by eminent counsel chose to follow the lead of Robinson v. Cone. Referring to Hartfield v. Roper, Wagner, J., says in Boland v. … It is first used several times in the sense of the original harm to the knee by the lick of the board.

Gluck v. Terminal Railroad

702 S.W.2d 476 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jan 15, 1986

See generally Smithpeter v. Wabash, 360 Mo. 835 , 231 S.W.2d 135, 141-43 (banc 1950); Wells v. Payne, supra, at 490. See also Brown v. St. Louis-San Francisco R. Co., 212 Mo.App. 541 , 248 S.W. 12 (1923). … Louis County Board of Freeholders submitted a proposed plan of the Metropolitan St. Louis Sewer District to the Voters of St. Louis and St. Louis County.

Drolshagen v. Union Depot Railroad

186 Mo. 258 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Feb 15, 1905

[Roberts v. Railroad, 43 Mo. App. 287 ; Enterprise Soap Works v. Sayers, 51 Mo. App. 310 ; Brownell v. Railroad, 47 Mo. 243 ; Brady v. Connelly, 52 Mo. 19 ; St. Louis to use v. Allen, 53 Mo. 49 ; Owens v. … Railroad, 58 Mo. 386 , l. c. 394; Rinard v. Railroad, 164 Mo. 270 , l. c. 284.]

Ruppel v. Ralston Purina Company

423 S.W.2d 752 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jan 8, 1968

All three, Flanigan v. City of Springfield, Mo.Sup., 360 S.W.2d 700 ; Shelley v. Ozark Pipe Line Corporation, 327 Mo. 238 , 37 S.W.2d 518 , 75 A.L.R. 1316 , and McCracken v. … Vaughn v. Missouri Power & Light Co., Mo.App., 89 S.W.2d 699 ; Schumacher v. Shawhan Distillery Co., 178 Mo.App. 361 , 165 S.W. 1142 ; Krebs v. Bambrick Bros. Const. Co., 144 Mo.App. 649 , 129 S.W. 425 .

State v. Thompson

627 S.W.2d 298 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Feb 9, 1982

S. v. Rucker, 435 F.2d 950, 952-53 (8th Cir. 1971); Moore v. Board of Education, 547 S.W.2d 188, 191-92 (Mo.App.1977). … The Washington Court found: Where, as here, the Board does not object to the federal act of designating or rescheduling a substance, it becomes controlled after 30 days by reason of the Board’s inaction or acquiescence in

State v. Dorsey

491 S.W.2d 301 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Mar 12, 1973

In one, State v. … State, 135 Ala. 56 , 33 So. 677 ; Redus v. State, 82 Ala. 53 , 2 So. 713 ; State v. Tapit, 52 W. Va. 473 , 44 S.E. 231 ; State v. Bollis, 73 Miss. 57 , 19 So. 99 ; State v. Wardlaw, 43 Ark. 73 ; Commonwealth v.

Collins v. Twellman

344 Mo. 330 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Mar 15, 1939

A full history of this legislation up to the year 1901 will be found in the case of Yall v. Gillham, 187 Mo. 393 , 86 S.W. 125 . We need not repeat the history of these various acts prior to that decision. … The case of Yall v. Gillham, supra, is cited as an authority.

Vanzant & Co. v. Hunter

1 Mo. 71 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Apr 15, 1821

This was an action of trover, brought by Vanzant & Co. v. Hunter, for eighty-six barrels of flour; plea, not guilty; issue joined and found, by the Court for the plaintiffs. … After the boat had proceeded on her way from Herculaneum, Baily came on board and took the command of the boat; when the boat and cargo arrived at St.

State v. Kelly

539 S.W.2d 106 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jul 12, 1976

As stated in State v. … It was settled in State v. Brown, 443 S.W.2d 805 [7] (Mo.1969) that the giving of that instruction at the time the judge charges the jury is permissible. Judgment affirmed. MORGAN, HENLEY, and FINCH, JJ., concur.

First Methodist Church v. Berryman

303 Mo. 475 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Apr 7, 1924

*Page 489 [McCallister v. Ross, 155 Mo. 87 , 94; Strother v. Barrow, 246 Mo. 241 , 257, 151 S.W. 960 ; Dudley v. Clark, 255 Mo. 570 , 589.] III. … [Jackson v. Wood, 88 Mo. 76 , 78.]

American Family Mutual Insurance Co. v. Ward

774 S.W.2d 135 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Aug 1, 1989

Based on stipulated facts and cross-motions for summary judgment, the trial court ordered the settlement proceeds to be distributed as follows: Brown and Brown attorney’s fee lien.$8,333.33 Dyanne K. … Nanney v. I.H. Shell & Son, 138 S.W.2d 717 , 719 (Mo.App.1940); see also State ex rel. Jewish Hospital of St. Louis v. Buder, 540 S.W.2d 100 (Mo.App.1976); Klein v. Abramson, 513 S.W.2d 714 (Mo.App.1974); State ex rel.

Gladstone Special Road District of Clay County v. County Court of Clay County

365 Mo. 1097 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jul 9, 1956

V, § 3, V.A.M.S.; Lamaar Township v. City of Lamar, 261 Mo. 171, 177 , 169 S.W. 12 , Ann.Cas.1916D, 740; Wright County ex rel. Elk Creek Tp. v. Farmers’ & Merchants’ Bk., Mo., 30 S.W.2d 32 , 33 [1]. See also T. J. … Jones v. Meyer, 321 Mo. 858 , 12 S.W.2d 489, 490 .

State Ex Rel. Y.M.C.A. v. Gehner

320 Mo. 1172 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Oct 2, 1928

Cunningham v. Board of Assessors, 52 La. Ann. 223 , 26 So. 872 .] … Society v. Board of Review, 290 Ill. l.c. 115.] The Odd Fellows conducted an organization for charitable purposes and raised a fund to aid in such purposes.

Green v. State

494 S.W.2d 356 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Apr 11, 1973

Jones v. State, 471 S.W.2d 166 (Mo.1971). … Morrissey, supra, holds that due process requires notice and hearing before a revocation could properly be made by a State Board of Parole.

State ex rel. Hammerstein v. Williams

95 Mo. 159 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Apr 15, 1888

In the case of State ex rel. v. Foster, 38 Ohio St. 599 , the above rule is quoted, and was acted upon, and it is there held that when the returns showed that votes were cast for H. L. … Had these allegations been made, the trial court would, under our ruling in the case of State ex rel. v.