Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersmo

10,000+ results

3.14s

  • Land Clearance for Redevelopment Authority of St. Louis v. City of St. Louis

    270 S.W.2d 58 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jul 20, 1954

    In the case of City of Joplin v. … Co. v.

    Cited 26 timesPublished
  • Laney v. Garbee

    105 Mo. 355 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Apr 15, 1891

    Bank v. Suman, 79 Mo. 530 ; Brown v. Langlois, 70 Mo. 226 ; Blodgett v. Schaffer, 94 Mo. 669 . It is insisted that the manner of service cannot be shown to contradict the recitals of the judgment. … Milner v. Shipley, 94 Mo. 106 ; Adams v. Cowles, 95 Mo. 506 ; Crow v. Meyersieck, 88 Mo. 415 ; McClanahan v. West, 100 Mo. 321 ; Blodgett w. Schaffer, 94 Mo. 671 .

    Cited 22 timesPublished
  • Meyering v. Miller

    330 Mo. 885 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jun 13, 1932

    [Thompson v. City of St. Louis, 253 S.W. 969 .] … This court held against that contention, following the case of Hart v. Board of Directors of Nevada School District, 299 Mo. 36 , 252 S.W. 441 .

    Cited 25 timesPublished
  • Julian v. Wrightsman

    73 Mo. 569 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Apr 5, 1881

    The record shows that the partnership assets in plaintiff’s hands were not sufficient to pay the partnership debts, and under the authority of the following cases, (Duhring v. Duhring, 20 Mo. 174 ; Willet *572 v. … Brown, 65 Mo. 138 ; State ex rel. v.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Heard v. Ritchey

    112 Mo. 516 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Dec 6, 1892

    Mason v. Barnard, 36 Mo. 391 ; Turk v. Stahl, 53 Mo. 438 ; Dillinger v. Kelley, 84 Mo. 561 ; Brown v. Shock, 27 Mo. App. 351 ; Duryee v. Turner, 20 Mo. App. 34 ; McQuillan’s Pleading & Practice, sec. 461, and notes.

    Cited 12 timesPublished
  • Mellier v. Bartlett

    89 Mo. 134 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Apr 15, 1886

    Nelson v. Brown, 23 Mo. 19 ; Keith v. Plemmons, 28 Mo. 104 . Hence, an injunction cannot be issued by one court to enjoin an execution issued from another court. Pettus v. Elgin, 11 Mo. 411 .

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Walters v. Markwardt

    361 Mo. 936 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Mar 12, 1951

    There were xio guard rails at the ditch, either along the .sidewalk or oxx the board platform. Plaintiff was injured by falling from the board platform into the ditch. … (See Overholt v. Vieths, 93 Mo. 422 , 6 S. W. 74 ; Devine v. Heckman (Kan.) 245 Pac. 1037 ; Holifield v. Wigdor, 361 Mo. 636 , 235 S. W. (2d) 564 .)

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Guastello v. Department of Liquor Control

    536 S.W.2d 21 · Supreme Court of Missouri · May 5, 1976

    As noted in the Damiano opinion, such a result is consistent with the holding of this court in Hughes v. State Board of Health, *25 supra, to the extent the instant question was considered in the latter case. … Cloud v. Election Board of State, 169 Okl. 363 , 36 P.2d 20 (1934); Morris v.

    Cited 27 timesPublished
  • Robin v. Blue Cross Hospital Service, Inc.

    637 S.W.2d 695 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Aug 31, 1982

    V, § 10. … In Madden , the California Board of Retirement negotiated a medical benefit plan with Kaiser. The plan contained an arbitration clause.

    Cited 114 timesPublished
  • Henry & Coatsworth Co. v. Evans

    97 Mo. 47 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Oct 15, 1888

    Such was the law of Colorado when the decision in Jensen v. Brown (1875) 2 Col. 697 , was announced. Session Laws Colorado, 1872, p. 150, sec. 6. The law of Iowa was somewhat similar when Stewart v. … Murray v. Brown, 91 U. S. 266 . A familiar illustration of the principle is found in the admiralty.

    Cited 40 timesPublished
  • Francis v. Kansas City, St. Joseph & Council Bluffs Railroad

    127 Mo. 658 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Mar 19, 1895

    In Hamilton v. … Covey v. Railroad, 27 Mo. App. 170 ; Francis v. Railroad, 110 Mo. 387 ; Alcorn v. Railroad, 108 Mo. 81 ; *675 Rutledge v. Railroad, 123 Mo. 121 ; Railroad v. Rosenzweig, 26 Am. and Eng. Railroad Cases, 489; Seese v.

    Cited 22 timesPublished
  • Hughes v. Schmidt

    325 Mo. 1099 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jul 9, 1930

    so that it slipped off of the other board. … In Stein v. Rainey et al., 315 Mo. 535 , 286 S.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Wilkerson v. Prelutsky

    943 S.W.2d 643 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Apr 29, 1997

    Brown v. Hamid, 856 S.W.2d 51, 55 (Mo. banc 1993) (quoting Annin v. Bi-State Dev. Agency, 657 S.W.2d 382, 385 (Mo.App.1983)). … State v. Purlee, 839 S.W.2d 584, 592 (Mo. banc 1992).

    Cited 153 timesPublished
  • Haag v. Ward

    186 Mo. 325 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Feb 15, 1905

    [Brown v. Railroad, 175 Mo. 185 .] II. … [Wooten v. Walters, 110 N. C. 251 ; Mills v. Charleton, 29 Wis. 400 ; Himmelmann v. Satterlee, 50 Cal. 70 .]

    Cited 15 timesPublished
  • State ex inf. Crow v. Fleming

    147 Mo. 1 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Feb 16, 1898

    State v. Tolle, 71 Mo. 645 ; State v. Herrmann, 75 Mo. 349 , and numerous other cases. … Pearce v.

    Cited 33 timesPublished
  • Grooms v. Morrison

    249 Mo. 544 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Apr 8, 1913

    [Golden v. Tyer, 180 Mo. 196 ; Brown Const. Co. v. MacArthur Bros. Co., 236 Mo. 41 , l. c. 50; Keeney v. McVoy, 206 Mo. 42 , l. c. 59; Turner v. Edmonston, 210 Mo. l. c. 428.] … He cites: Bruensmann v. Carroll, 52 Mo. 313 ; Long v. Wagoner, 47 Mo. 178 ; Davis v. Hess, 103 Mo. 31 ; Walton v. Drumtra, 152 Mo. 489 ; Linville v. Greer, 165 Mo. 380 ; Bradshaw v. Bradbury, 64 Mo. 334 ; Wolfe v.

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • Union National Bank v. Hill

    148 Mo. 380 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Mar 7, 1899

    Thompson v. … Bent v. Priest, 86 Mo. 482 ; Slattery v. Transfer Co., 91 Mo. 217 ; Ward v. Davidson, 89 Mo. 445 ; Hodges v. Screw Co., 1 R. I. 312; Smith v. Hurd, 12 Metc. 371 ; Attorney-Genl. v. Ins. Co., 2 John.

    Cited 26 timesPublished
  • Drolshagen v. Union Depot Railroad

    186 Mo. 258 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Feb 15, 1905

    [Roberts v. Railroad, 43 Mo. App. 287 ; Enterprise Soap Works v. Sayers, 51 Mo. App. 310 ; Brownell v. Railroad, 47 Mo. 243 ; Brady v. Connelly, 52 Mo. 19 ; St. Louis to use v. Allen, 53 Mo. 49 ; Owens v. … Railroad, 58 Mo. 386 , l. c. 394; Rinard v. Railroad, 164 Mo. 270 , l. c. 284.]

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • State v. Thompson

    627 S.W.2d 298 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Feb 9, 1982

    S. v. Rucker, 435 F.2d 950, 952-53 (8th Cir. 1971); Moore v. Board of Education, 547 S.W.2d 188, 191-92 (Mo.App.1977). … The Washington Court found: Where, as here, the Board does not object to the federal act of designating or rescheduling a substance, it becomes controlled after 30 days by reason of the Board’s inaction or acquiescence in

    Cited 23 timesPublished
  • Abernathy v. Moore

    83 Mo. 65 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Oct 15, 1884

    Brown v. Woody, 64 Mo. 547 ; Kleinsteuber v. Schumacher, 35 Wis. 612 ; Nazro v. Cragin, 3 Dillon 474 ; Mathie v. McIntosh, 40 Wis. 120 ; Wildman v. Rider, 23 Con. 172. … Johnson v. Buell, 26 Ill. 66 ; Bonner v. Brown, 10 La. An. 334; Brackett v. Brackett, 61 Mo. 221 . Formerly otherwise in Missouri. Whiting v. Budd, 5 Mo. 443 ; Evans v. King, 7 Mo. 411 .

    Cited 8 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.