Case law

State v. Kemp

365 Mo. 368 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Sep 29, 1955

Thompson v. Board of Regents, 305 Mo. 57 , 264 S.W. 698, 700 . See also Greenhalgh v. Woolworth, 361 Pa. 543 , 64 A.2d 659, 664 [6]; Public Market Co. of Portland v. … Thompson v. Board of Regents, 305 Mo. 57 , 264 S.W. 698, 700 .

State v. Chandler

698 S.W.2d 844 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Oct 16, 1985

V, § 3. … It appears that Brown too was paid to represent Richard by Anding.

Henderson v. Plumbers Local No. 8

471 S.W.2d 929 · Supreme Court of Missouri · May 10, 1971

National Labor Relations Board, 10th Cir., Ill F.2d 539, and Pueblo Gas & Fuel Co. v. National Labor Relations Board, 10th Cir., 118 F.2d 304 , is not here controlling. … Only in National Labor Relations Board v.

Schlicker v. Gordon

74 Mo. 534 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Oct 15, 1881

Hensley v. Baker, 10 Mo. 157 ; McCune v. Hull, 20 Mo. 596 ; Edwardson v. Garnhart, 56 Mo. 81 . 2.-. … ; that in September, 1876, plaintiff called upon Gordon and Einke for $1,500; that the school board had no money on hand; that the amount called for was borrowed irom one Holloway, and the note given for it, and upon which

State v. Swan

234 Mo. 270 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Apr 11, 1911

BROWN, J. — Defendant was convicted of vagrancy in the St. … [State v. Cook, 217 Mo. 326 ; State ex rel. v. Hitchcock, 86 Mo. 231 ; State v. Boehler, 220 Mo. l. c. 5; Graham v. Deguire, 154 Mo. 88 ; State v. Elschinger, 223 Mo. 53 .]

City of Valley Park v. Armstrong

273 S.W.3d 504 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jan 13, 2009

Hagely v. Board of Education of the Webster Groves School District, 841 S.W.2d 663, 668 (Mo. banc 1992). … Hagely v. Board of Educ. of Webster Groves School Dist., 841 S.W.2d 663, 668 (Mo. banc 1992).

State ex rel. Woodson v. Robinson

270 Mo. 212 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Feb 26, 1917

This has been the Missouri rule since the early case of Castello v. St. Louis Circuit Court, 28 Mo. 259 . Other *223 Missouri cases are Wilson v. Lucas, 43 Mo. 290 ; Bowen v. Hixon, 45 Mo. 340 ; Higbee v. … [State ex rel. v. Smith, 104 Mo. l. c. 667; Nash v. Craig, 134 Mo. l. c. 353, 354.]

Queen City Furniture & Carpet Co. v. Crawford

127 Mo. 356 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Mar 12, 1895

The question is very clearly discussed at length in Heath v. … But she further testified, to what would seem to be the plain, common sense idea all the parties must have entertained, that she was employed by the board, and ‘expected the board — the defendants — would provide the means

State v. Emrich

250 S.W.2d 718 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jul 14, 1952

When they passed the Jim Brown farm, Brown was down at the barn, he waved at them and they waved back. … State v. Stogsdill, 324 Mo. 105 , 23 S.W.2d 22, 27 ; State v. Craft, 299 Mo. 332 , 253 S.W. 224, 228 ; State v. Pierson, 343 Mo. 841 , 123 S.W.2d 149, 156 . We hold that a submissible case was made out. State v.

Hamer v. Cook

118 Mo. 476 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Dec 7, 1893

Church v. Robberson, 71 Mo. 326 . … Hagerman v. Sutton, 91 Mo. 519 ; Rosenheim v. Hart-sock, 90 Mo. 357 ; Gray v. Bowles, 74 Mo. 419 ; Lingo v. Burford, 112 Mo. 149 ; Union Depot Co. v. Frederick, 117 Mo. 138 . III.

State v. Tucker

84 Mo. 23 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Oct 15, 1884

S. v. Amedy, 11 Wheat. 392 ; People v. Hughes, 29 Cal. 257 . … Brown, 75 Mo. 317 ), or whether they be civil. Huxley v. Harrold, 62 Mo. 516 .

Meek v. Hewitt

48 Mo. 337 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Aug 15, 1871

(Bruce v. Vogel, 38 Mo. 100 ; Parker v. Hann. & St. Jo. R.R. Co., 44 Mo. 415 .) Under no possible circumstances can the evidence be made to support the finding and judgment of the court. … Previous to his departure he* owned property and kept house, but when he left he quit housé-keeping, and his wife boarded at several places during his-absence.. .It is not denied that she was boarding in another family when

Hequembourg v. Edwards

155 Mo. 514 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Mar 27, 1900

[State to use of Phillips v. Rowse, 49 Mo. 586 ; Roan v. Winn, 93 Mo. 503 ; Jacobi v. Jacobi, 101 Mo. 507 .] … In Bales v.

Stripe Ex Rel. Shannon v. Meffert

287 Mo. 366 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Apr 9, 1921

[Jones v. Driskill, 94 Mo. 200 ; Hyatt v. Wolfe, 22 Mo. App. 191 ; Turner v. Babb, 6 Mo. 347 .] … Brown and Ragland, CC., concur.

State v. Moses

139 Mo. 217 · Supreme Court of Missouri · May 25, 1897

State v. Bulling, 105 Mo. 204 ; State v. Welsor, 117 Mo. 570 ; State v. Brown, 119 Mo. 527 , and numerous other cases. … Ray, 53 Mo. 349 ; State v. McLaughlin, 27 Mo. 111 ; State v. Campbell, 115 Mo. 391 ; State v. Nickens, 122 Mo. 607 ; State v. Welsor, supra; State v. Musick, 101 Mo. 260 .

Wilhite v. Wilhite

284 Mo. 387 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Sep 15, 1920

[Williamson v. Brown, 195 Mo. l.c. 331; Corrigan v. Tiernay, 100 Mo. l.c. 280-281; McKim v. Met. St. Ry. Co., 196 Mo. App. l.c. 547-8.] … [Viers v. Viers, 175 Mo. l.c. 453; Curd v. Brown, 148 Mo. l.c. 92.]

State Ex Rel. McKittrick v. American Colony Insurance

336 Mo. 406 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Feb 7, 1935

The District Court is not confined to a mere re-examination of the case as heard and decided by the Board of Commissioners, but hears the case de novo, 'upon the papers and testimony which had been used before the board, … Brown v. Town of Westport, 116 Mo. 582 , 593 et seq., 22 S. W. 888, 890 ; State ex inf. Major, Atty. Gen., v. Arkansas Lumber Co., 260 Mo. 212, 284 , 169 S. W. 145, 168 ; State ex inf. Otto, Atty. Gen., v.

State Ex Rel. Brentwood School District v. State Tax Commission

589 S.W.2d 613 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Nov 14, 1979

V, § 3. … Board of Equalization, 586 S.W.2d 338 (Mo. banc 1979), we held that a school district did not have standing to appeal decisions of the county board of equalization. The Court reasoned in St.

Kerstner v. Vorweg

130 Mo. 196 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Oct 11, 1895

Garland v. Smith, 127 Mo. 567 . … Scovill v. Baldwin, 27 Conn. 318 ; Bent v. Lewis, 88 Mo. 470 . As was said by Judge Eombaueb, in Did v. Bqilroad, 37 Mo.

Drake v. Curtis

88 Mo. 644 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Apr 15, 1886

Was it error to exclude the evidence % Since the decision oi Bright et al. v. … Louis, 69 Mo. 595 ; Bradstreet v. Kinsella, 76 Mo. 63 .